Buy marijuana Esfahan

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buy marijuana Esfahan

We use cookies to collect information about how you use the Police Scotland website. We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve our services. Your search results for wickr id ryhp or telegram dimarca12 buy oxycodone online oxycontin percocet xanax weed cannabis extract vape pen strains marijuana carts catridges oil buy dabs concerntrates in Esfahan Iran telegram. Tell us whether you accept cookies We use cookies to collect information about how you use the Police Scotland website. Accept all cookies Set cookie preferences. Search results Your search results for wickr id ryhp or telegram dimarca12 buy oxycodone online oxycontin percocet xanax weed cannabis extract vape pen strains marijuana carts catridges oil buy dabs concerntrates in Esfahan Iran telegram.

Resolutions / Decisions

Buy marijuana Esfahan

Inscriptions on the World Heritage Linked to a site All Linked to a site Not Linked to a site. Session: 27COM close. Exports Excel file. By Year. The World Heritage Committee,1. Year: Noting that the 6th extraordinary session of the World Heritage Committee adopted a decision on item 14A Nominations to be examined in and see Decision 6 EXT. The World Heritage Committee, 1. Noting that in view of the above, the transitional provisions relating to the election of the Bureau found in Decision 6 EXT. COM 3, can no longer be applied,3. Decides to elect, on an exceptional basis, a Bureau with the following composition: a Ms Vera Lacoeuilhe Saint Lucia as Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee for the duration of the 27th session of Notes with appreciation the Report of the Rapporteur on the 6th extraordinary session of the World Heritage Committee in ;2. Further requests the World Heritage Centre in order to ensure an institutional Recalling the need for the Committee to be kept informed on the implementation of its decisions, 3. Invites the Secretariat to present to the Committee, at each of its ordinary ordinary sessions, a 'Report on the Implementation of the Decisions taken by the World Heritage Committee'. This Report will replace the Secretariat Report. Having taken note of the information concerning the threats to the archaeological property of Tell Rumeida, in the Palestinian Territories,2. Requests the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to carry out a mission to the property to examine its state of conservation at the earliest possible time, within the scope of Decision 26 COM 6. Appeals to all concerned parties to ensure that Expresses its sincere appreciation to the Asia-Pacific States Parties, the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies for their collaboration over the past 6 years that led to the successful preparation of the comprehensive 'Synthesis Regional Periodic Report for the Asia-Pacific Region ';2. Takes note of the sub-regional and regional recommendations and action plans proposed in the 'Synthesis Regional Periodic Report for the Asia-Pacific Region ', which were elaborated by the States Parties together with the World Heritage Requests the World Heritage Centre to produce a publication within three months, if possible, to be funded from extrabudgetary funds, on the Arab States Periodic Report carried out in the year and information on the follow-up actions. Notes the progress made to date in the preparation for the Periodic Reporting in Latin America and the Caribbean and in Europe and North Reiterates its serious concern for the state of conservation of this property and the need for increased international support and co-operation, including that between the Central African Republic, Chad and Sudan; 2. Requests that the State Party take all necessary measures to halt mining along the Manovo River in order to minimize negative impacts of mining on the integrity of the Park and confirm in writing the outcome of the measures taken; 3. Central African Republic. Expresses its serious concerns about the continuing threats of poaching in all properties and encroachments and cattle farming in Virunga; 2. Democratic Republic of the Congo. Commends the State Party on actions undertaken during the past year to improve the conservation of the Simien National Park World Heritage property; 2. Recommends that the State Party continue implementing the positive measures mentioned in its report until significant on-the-ground conservation improvements are evident; 3. Sites: Simien National Park. Commends Fauna and Flora International on its commitment to continue co-operation with the Guinean State Party in addressing the refugee crisis and developing a long-term management project;3. Expresses its serious concerns regarding the lack of clarity on the information received on the vehicles provided with financial assistance from the World Heritage Fund and reported stolen, and reiterates its request from the 26th session of the Committee in , that the State Party report on the above issue and on progress made in the implementation of the rehabilitation plan; 2. Requests IUCN and the World Heritage Centre, in co-operation with the State Party, to undertake a mission to the property and carry out a systematic assessment and to submit a Congratulates the State Party and associated partners for their efforts to control Salvinia molesta in a cost effective manner; 2. Notes that savings made in the project funds are being used for strengthening State Party capacity to protect the property and implement measures benefiting the conservation of waterfowl; 3. Sites: Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary. Noting that IUCN believes that the property's conditions have improved substantially since it was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger in and that the State Party is showing increased commitment to the conservation of the property,2. Commends the Uganda Wildlife Authority for the improvements to the management of the property and their efforts to protect the property in times of instability;3. Invites the State Party to consider according a greater level of financial support to ensure the minimum level of effective property management, Sites: Rwenzori Mountains National Park. Congratulates the State Party for successfully convening a workshop, held in January to identify indicators and benchmarks in order to monitor the recovery of the property, and for demonstrating strong commitment to the rehabilitation of the Ichkeul National Park;2. Urges the State Party to write to the Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee confirming that it will consider the Ichkeul National Park as a water 'consumer' and commit to an annual water inflow into the lake of an average of 80 to million cubic metres from the upstream Sites: Ichkeul National Park. Commends the Indian Government and partner institutes and research bodies for their efforts in preparing a World Heritage Biodiversity Programme for India with support for project preparation from the United Nations Foundation UNF ; 2. Invites the State Party to submit a report to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February on the possible financing and execution of the Programme, including the implementation measures recommended by the 26th session of the Committee and the IUCN mission of early for the conservation of Manas, for examination by Sites: Manas Wildlife Sanctuary. Notes that the management plan was submitted by the State Party on 25 June ;2. Encourages the State Party to request, if necessary, technical assistance from the World Heritage Fund to urgently purchase a portable electric generator to enable rapid closure of the sluice gates in a potential emergency situation; 3. Urges the State Party to submit a calendar of activities for preparing a proposal for a transborder World Heritage area in the Danube Delta in co-operation with other concerned States Parties; 4. Decides to remove Srebarna Nature Reserve from Sites: Srebarna Nature Reserve. Notes the detailed report by the State Party provided on 17 April and acknowledges the effort and commitment by the State Party in addressing key management problems;2. Invites the State Party to co-operate with the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to prepare a report by 1 February for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 28th session in , describing the steps the State Party intends to take to develop and implement action plans and define parameters and conditions to monitor progress in the restoration of the property, with a Sites: Everglades National Park. United States of America. Notes the detailed report by the State Party provided on 17 April ;2. Urges the State Party to continue to report on Yellowstone's snowmobile phase-out and other efforts to ensure that winter travel facilities respect the protection of the Park, its visitors, and its wildlife; 3. Recommends that the State Party continue its efforts in ensuring that the Mclaren Mine tailings are not contaminating the property; 4. Recognizes the progress made in addressing all the key issues that led to the inclusion of the property on the List of World Heritage in Sites: Yellowstone National Park. Commends the State Party for its co-operation on this project and urges the State Party to continue this collaboration in order to improve protection of the property; 3. Recommends that the State Party work closely with the coordinator of the project 'Enhancing Our Heritage' and Fundacion Natura in order to seek appropriate funding for the revision of the management plan as a priority, and for the Sites: Sangay National Park. Commends the State Party for its efforts to continue to improve management of the property; 3. Thanking the Government of Japan for their financial contribution to the restoration of King Behanzin's Palace,2. Requests the World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS in co-operation with the State Party to undertake an evaluation mission to the property in view of preparing a report by 1 February for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 28th session in on the state of conservation of this property to enable the World Heritage Committee to decide whether or not to remove it from the List of World Heritage in Danger;3. Decides to retain Sites: Royal Palaces of Abomey. Expresses its appreciation to the Italian Government for its support towards the implementation of the World Heritage Convention in Africa; 3. Invites the State Party to implement to the extent possible the Sites: Timbuktu. Having noted the information provided by the World Heritage Centre following the mission to the property,;2. Strongly encourages the Government of Algeria to take the necessary measures towards the swift implementation of the recommendations contained in the World Heritage Centre's report, and notably: a The immediate delimitation of the official perimeter of the World Heritage property and its buffer zone, based on the existing archaeological studies, and the issuing of a temporary decree freezing all constructions within these boundaries, b The Sites: Tipasa. Having taken note of the information provided by the World Heritage Centre on the results of the mission to the property,;2. Commends the State Party for the efforts which are made in order to complete the programme for the protection of the area; 3. Stresses, however, that engineering solutions to the groundwater problems might prove not cost-effective and sustainable if the source of the problem is not addressed in a comprehensive and co-ordination effort; 4. Sites: Abu Mena. Commends the Oman authorities for the progress achieved in the preparation of the management plan and for having re-appointed a Chief Site Conservator; 2. Encourages the State Party to continue supporting the elaboration of the management plan, as well as the development of national capacity towards the establishment of a permanent management structure that will be responsible for the daily implementation of the Plan; 3. Invites the State Party to hold the first of the two workshops foreseen for the reviewing and development of the management plan, and to Sites: Bahla Fort. Noting that, despite the commitment and support of the Government, progress has been very slow in addressing the threats that had justified the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger,;2. Urges the Government of Yemen to take immediate measures towards the enforcement of the ban on new constructions within the Old City decided in , and the strengthening of the local bodies in charge of the conservation of the property, including the local General Organization for the Preservation of the Historic Cities of Yemen GOPHCY Unit, Sites: Historic Town of Zabid. Having examined the state of conservation report of the Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam,; 2. Notes with concern the instability of the leaning Minaret, continued illicit on-site excavation and lack of management mechanism; 3. Expresses appreciation to the Governments of Greece, Italy and Switzerland for their generous contributions for the protection of the property; 4. Requests the State Party and UNESCO to continue to co-operate closely to enhance the protection, conservation and management of the property to prevent looting on-site and to Sites: Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam. Sites: Angkor. Having noted the information provided by the World Heritage Centre further to its mission to the property,;2. Commends the State Party, particularly the Karnataka State Government, for the tangible action taken to implement the corrective measures to protect the World Heritage property;3. Congratulates the State Party for the decision to postpone the completion of the vehicular bridge until the by-pass road is constructed and to consider the vehicular bridge to be temporary, pending the identification of a long-term solution within the Hampi management Sites: Group of Monuments at Hampi. Expresses appreciation to the State Party for submitting the revised work plan and budget breakdown for the Shalamar Gardens International Assistance request; 2. Requests the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre to assist the authorities in implementing this International Assistance request; 3. Requests the State Party to examine the heritage values of Shalamar Gardens and Lahore Fort to redefine the core, buffer and support zones of these two properties;4. Takes note with satisfaction, of the on-going positive co-operation between the Department Sites: Fort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore. Having examined the state of conservation of the property; 2. Requests UNESCO, the Advisory Bodies and other international partners to support and strengthen the international co-operation activities with the competent national and local authorities by mobilising Sites: Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras. Expresses its appreciation to the Albanian authorities for the progress made with the legal protection of and the institutional arrangements for the World Heritage property; 2. Recalls that a mission is foreseen to the property in October in order to assess if the property can be removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger; 3. Requests that a report, taking into account all issues which led to the inscription of the property in the List of World Heritage in Danger, be submitted to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February for examination Sites: Butrint. Notes that the threats for which the property was included on the List of World Heritage in Danger in , namely the partial destruction due to an earthquake, have been mitigated through professional restoration;3. Expresses its concern about the risks that excessive and uncontrolled urbanisation have on the exceptional universal value of the property;4. Requests the State Party to take into account the specific recommendations from the Taking note of the measures and the studies undertaken by the State Party to protect the property,;2. Commending the State Party for the efforts made to monitor the water level;3. Urges the State Party to adopt the draft legislation foreseen;4. Strongly recommends that the State Party defines the limits of the property in order to avoid further encroachment;5. Recommends that the State Party reviews the system of water canalisation, water distribution and considers requesting international assistance under the World Heritage Fund to identify the appropriate Sites: Chan Chan Archaeological Zone. Sites: Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls. The World Heritage Committee \[15\], 1. The World Heritage Committee \[30\],1. Expresses its appreciation to the State Party for favourably considering the recommendations of the joint international urban planning expert and ICOMOS mission of July ; 2. Notes with appreciation that a compromise solution is being elaborated between the national and local authorities to reduce the height of the commercial complex to minimize the negative impact of this high rise building to the World Heritage property;3. Requests the authorities of Iran to continue their efforts to ensure the conservation of the authentic setting and integrity Sites: Meidan Emam, Esfahan. Iran Islamic Republic of. The World Heritage Committee \[57\], 1. Commends the authorities for their efforts to increase the protection and conservation of the property; 3. Strongly supports the current initiative to co-ordinate and manage the conservation process through the design and implementation of a comprehensive Master Plan that includes management The World Heritage Committee \[59\],1. Takes note of the willingness of the State Party to undertake the actions requested by the Committee over the last years; 2. Invites the State Party to finalize as soon as possible the Master Plan as well as the urban planning and feasibility studies;3. Sites: Chavin Archaeological Site. The World Heritage Committee \[1\],1. Recalling that requests have been made by the Committee and its Bureau to the State Party to take urgent actions to stop illegal poaching in the Reserve and to implement the recommendations of the Sangmelima workshop 'Participative Management and Sustainable Development', 23 - 26 March, , organised by World Heritage Centre ,; 2. Noting that the State Party has renewed efforts to improve the management of Dja Faunal Reserve by drafting a management plan,;3. Welcomes the actions being undertaken by the State Party to implement the Sites: Dja Faunal Reserve. Noting the recent report of the State Party to the World Heritage Centre, received 5 May , which highlights that the situation at this property The World Heritage Committee \[2\],1. Noting the results of the report provided by the UNESCO and IUCN mission to the property and the existing number of positive actions that have been carried out by the State Party to improve the management of the property and the protection of the World Heritage value of the property,;2. Commends the State Party for positive actions undertaken so far for the conservation of the property, particularly in relation to the control of illegal logging, charcoal kilns and marijuana fields; 3. Urges the State Party to clarify jurisdiction arrangements over the Notes that the proposed construction of a dam, as well as the exploitation of a phosphate mine are a serious potential threat to the integrity of the property;3. Recognises the importance of finding solutions to the Sites: W-Arly-Pendjari Complex. The World Heritage Committee \[3\],1. Taking note of the urgent need to re-establish co-operation and confidence among the stakeholders for the purpose of effective conservation and management of St. Lucia Wetland National Park,; 2. Expresses strong concern regarding the potential impacts that the reported developments and the lack of a comprehensive environmental assessment plan might have on the property;3. Encourages the promotion of the development of new skills such as tourism among local communities for a better management of the property;4. Requests the State Party to provide a Sites: iSimangaliso Wetland Park. South Africa. Notes that the road construction from Nouakchott to Nouadhibou has begun;2. Urges the State Party to organize a meeting to define the real impact of this road on the Park and to ensure that the Environment Impact Assessment EIA study complies with internationally recognized standards, in collaboration with interested donors; 3. Notes that oil exploration in the vicinity of the Park is being carried out, with indications that large reserves in the area may be exploited in the near future, causing a potentially serious threat to the marine life of the Sites: Banc d'Arguin National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[4\], 1. Notes that the World Heritage Centre and IUCN are consulting with concerned authorities in Indonesia to establish the Terms of Reference and determine suitable dates for the mission; 3. Sites: Lorentz National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[5\],1. Expresses its serious concerns over the failure to carry out the Environmental Impact Assessment EIA and the lack of consultations with the World Heritage Centre or IUCN in the design and implementation of the Kasra Bridge Project and the link road from Durbhagat to Bankatta, despite the protests of the national authority responsible for the property, namely the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation;2. Requests that the Director of the World Heritage Centre write to the highest officials of the concerned bi- and multilateral funding Sites: Chitwan National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[6\],1. Invites the State Party to continue the implementation of priority management needs identified under the Sagarmatha National Park Management Strategy Framework developed in while the Sites: Sagarmatha National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[7\], 1. Commends the State Party for actions taken to stop illegal fishing in the property while noting the need to ensure the full enforcement of the law in accordance with the World Heritage and National Park status of the property; 1. Requests the State Party to submit a report to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February , on the illegal fishing activities in the Sulu Sea and to prepare an analysis of its impact on the conservation of World Heritage in that ecosystem in order that the World Heritage Committee can examine the state of Sites: Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park. Sites: East Rennell. Solomon Islands. The World Heritage Committee \[8\],1. Commends the State Party for continuing various aspects of the management of Ha Long Bay, particularly those pertaining to visitor management in caves and to the World Heritage property;2. Notes with appreciation the State Party's provision of information on the work plan for the environmental management of Ha Long Bay World Heritage property by letter dated 8 April ;3. Requests IUCN and the World Heritage Centre to review the information provided and co-operate with the State Party to find ways and means of expediting the implementation of the Viet Nam. Notes the information provided by both States Parties;2. Encourages UNESCO and IUCN to undertake a monitoring mission to visit the property in in co-operation with the States Parties to review the state of conservation of the property and possibilities for transboundary management co-operation and to meet with all relevant stakeholders in both Belarus and Poland;3. Requests a report on the mission to be provided in order that the World Heritage Committee can examine the state of conservation of the property at its 28th session in Belarus Poland. Regrets that the Bulgarian authorities did not provide the report requested by 1 February until 29 May ;3. Welcomes the State Party's report and notes progress made in preparing the management plan for Pirin National Park, with support provided by the Swiss Government;4. Urges the Sites: Pirin National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[9\],1. Acknowledges progress made with the development of a new management plan for the property and the proposed expansion of the property as a long-term process, including consultations with the Deh Cho First Nations; 2. Requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed on the development of the new management plan and environmental impact assessment of the proposed mine at Prairie Creek. Sites: Nahanni National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[10\],1. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with an update on the situation related to the proposal to build a winter road following the Federal Court of Canada's decision. Sites: Wood Buffalo National Park. The World Heritage Committee \[11\], 1. Notes the report provided by the State Party and the positive development of the Constitutional Court ruling related to the adoption, legitimacy and implementation of the Landscape Territorial Plan; 2. Welcomes the State Party's intention to close the pumice quarries;3. Expresses concern about the status of the requests for opening of a new pumice stone quarry and the extension of four existing quarries within the World Heritage property; 4. Sites: Isole Eolie Aeolian Islands. Recalls the recommendation of the report of the monitoring mission in to include the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger,2. Regrets that the Russian authorities did not provide the report requested by 1 February 26 COM 21 b 19 until 20 May ;3. Further regrets that the high-level meeting called for by the Committee 26 COM 21 b 19 did not take place, and reiterates its request to the State Party to convene this meeting in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and IUCN and calls on it to do so as soon as possible;4. Sites: Lake Baikal. Russian Federation. Commends the State Party for beginning to implement Phase I of the project;3. Regrets that the Russian authorities did not provide the report requested by 1 February 26 COM 21 b 20 until 20 May ;4. Sites: Volcanoes of Kamchatka. The World Heritage Committee \[12\], 1. Acknowledges the additional comments by the authorities on the mission report; 3. Encourages the State Party to work towards a consistent plan in co-operation with all relevant stakeholders;5. Requests the submission to the World Sites: Giant's Causeway and Causeway Coast. The World Heritage Committee \[13\],1. Recalls that the State Party was to implement, as a matter of urgency, the Management Plan for this property, with provision for its on-going improvement based on input received and lessons learnt ;2. Requests the State Party to provide a copy of the management plan to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February in order that the World Heritage Committee can examine the state of conservation of the property at its 28th session in Sites: Henderson Island. Regrets that the Brazilian authorities did not invite the mission prior to its 27th session;3. Encourages the State Party of Brazil to co-operate with the State Party of Argentina towards the joint management of the two World Heritage properties;4. Costa Rica Panama. The World Heritage Committee \[16\],1. Noting that the State Party has removed the moratorium on construction within the property, and that this action is in accordance with the newly adopted management plan for the property, strictly limiting the total number of hotel rooms to be built in the reserve, 2. Invites the State Party to ensure strict adherence to the management plan and to carry out systematic environmental monitoring to detect and, if necessary, remedy any possible negative effects on the ecosystem of the property from the development;3. Sites: Sian Ka'an. The World Heritage Committee \[17\],1. Noting the actions undertaken so far by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to improve and assist Bandiagara,;2. Considering the importance to undertake all necessary measures for preventive action to protect a property inscribed on the World Heritage List,;3. Sites: Cliff of Bandiagara Land of the Dogons. Notes the new information provided by the State Party;2. Requests that the State Party provide a report on: a progress on compliance with ISO, b the ARRTC's continuing monitoring and review of water management and other environmental issues at Jabiluka and Ranger, c consultation with the Traditional Owners of Kakadu on cultural heritage management and protection. Sites: Kakadu National Park. The World Heritage Committee\[18\],1. Expresses its appreciation to the Chinese authorities for facilitating the ICOMOS mission and for providing further information regarding the tourism development projects in the buffer zone of the property; 3. Requests the State Party to: a strengthen the management mechanisms and the effective implementation of existing legal provisions for the protection of the property, including the Recalling that the Committee, since , has expressed its serious concerns about the management and planning arrangements of the Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu,; 2. Recalling that reactive monitoring missions were undertaken in , and and that the recommendations of these missions were endorsed by the Committee and transmitted to the Government of Peru for consideration and implementation,; 3. Recalling further that in May , as an exceptional measure, the Chairperson of the Committee addressed letters of concern to the Ministers of Sites: Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu. Sites: Lamu Old Town.

Buy marijuana Esfahan