Buy Heroin Bariloche

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buy Heroin Bariloche

The following essays present insights into the various levels of military involvement in the war on drugs and the implications of this involvement in terms of democracy and human rights in the Western hemisphere. Article by. This introduction provides an overview of the increasingly repressive approach to the drugs issue and its damaging impact on the fragile democratization process in Latin America. Accompanying the end of the Cold War were widespread hopes that Latin America would continue moving away from military dictatorships and civil wars. Both old and new obstacles, however, are threatening this process, and by now such optimism is hard to find on the streets anywhere across the continent. The drug issue - both in terms of the corrupting effects of illegal drug trafficking and the repressive approach in combating it - has become a key concern in the region. The problem's double-edged nature carries with it a highly explosive mix of ingredients: the criminalization of the economy and of society in general; the corruption of the judicial system and of the security forces; political corruption, the de-legitimization of government that contributes to the population's apathy toward the political system; a blurring of criminal and political violence; a fuelling of armed conflicts; new sources of human rights violations combined with new reasons for impunity; repressive legislation undermining civil rights; and a new agenda for relegitimizing the domestic role of the military apparatus. The nature and evolution of the drug business and the policies designed to counter it are intimately linked. The illegality of the drug economy - defined as such in a number of United Nations' Conventions - has turned the drug business into the most extensive and profitable commodity market in the world. The result has been a virtual arms race, increasingly involving military, intelligence and specialized police units in the fight against drugs. On the one hand, this has led drug trafficking networks to further professionalize, improving techniques to both subvert their opponents and to strengthen their power within the political system. Only the strongest drug trafficking organizations can survive - those with the best political and social connections. It should come as no surprise, then, that increasingly the world drug trade is carried out with institutional consent, often even under the control of sectors within the military, police or intelligence agencies. On the other hand, the war on drug trafficking has served to justify the expansion of the operational capacity of the States' repressive agencies and institutions. In a growing number of countries, the militarization of the fight against drugs has relegitimized a domestic role for the military, and has curbed civil liberties, often to a frightening extent. Moreover, the question of sovereignty is involved, since repressive strategies to combat drug trafficking often are the result of severe pressure from foreign powers. The war on drugs is largely financed from abroad, and has led to transnational military and intelligence cooperation completely unencumbered by national democratic controls. During the Reagan administration anti-drug policies were increasingly formulated in terms of 'War' and national security. After President George Bush's September announcement of the Andean Strategy, this doctrine was exported to the South, and entailed the active involvement of military forces in those countries where drugs were produced or trans-shipped, in a common counter-narcotics cause. Colombia was among the first to fully adopt this ideology, adding to it the concept of narco-guerrillas, which served to combine military assistance in anti-drug training programs with counterinsurgency operations. This phenomenon is explored in the essay by Ricardo Vargas , who focuses on the In the s, the drug issue took center stage. Following the break up of the Soviet bloc, the Pentagon had to come up with a new enemy in order to justify its defense budget and to maintain a global presence. Across the hemisphere, armed forces are undergoing a process of restructuring and are redefining their mission. In Central America, this is taking place in the context of the regional peace process and national negotiated settlements. Edgar Celada describes the course that this restructuring is taking in the region, with a special focus on Guatemala. Almost without exception, in one form or another, the issue of drug trafficking has entered military discourse during this process. Actual direct involvement in anti-drug operations, however, has been implemented slowly, with reluctance and in several countries has been seriously criticized. In many countries the first tasks assigned to the military were in the areas of aerial detection and intelligence gathering. But these first steps were usually the product of considerable pressure from Washington and differed substantially from country to country - depending on the nature of the local drug problem and the willingness of the government in power. In the case of Peru, for example, President Fujimori at first strongly objected to any military involvement in the drug war, only to announce in that the armed forces would be assigned a key role in anti-drugs activities. The trend toward economic globalization and the numerous initiatives of hemispheric and regional integration the North American Free Trade Agreement, Mercosur, the Central American Integration System, the Andean Pact, the Caribbean Community have served to accelerate the transnationalization of the structures that coordinate anti-drugs efforts. For the military, the counter-narcotics mission has been the most important vehicle available allowing for the intensification of trans-border collaboration. Other issues that also play an important role in post-Cold-War security are international terrorism, illegal immigration, and joint measures against rebel states such as Cuba. Nevertheless, the drug issue is considered outstanding among them. As US Defense Secretary William Perry stated at the second hemispheric Cuba excepted meeting of defense ministers in Bariloche, Argentina, in October drug trafficking is international, and does not respect borders, which puts national authorities at a tremendous disadvantage when confronting it. This annual meeting of defense ministers was first held in in Williamsburg, US. In the third meeting is to take place in Cartagena, Colombia, in spite of that country's decertification by the US. The upcoming defense ministers' meeting is the perfect forum for redefining the ideological underpinnings of today's military in the hemisphere. The concept of National Security is gradually being replaced by a new continental definition of security. As was the case with the previous doctrine, once again the Argentinean armed forces may be assigned a special role in the implementation of this doctrine throughout the continent. In the San Antonio Aericas Summit, when President Bush proposed the creation of a multilateral military force to combat drugs in Latin America, the idea was widely rejected out of concern for national sovereignty. At the Bariloche meeting the idea of a continental security strategy was raised once again. The first called for the creation of a regional military training center in the US which would specialize in counternarcotics. The second recommended channeling hemispheric military intelligence on drug trafficking through the Pentagon. The reactions from Perry's Latin American colleagues must have disappointed him. Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Mexico and Uruguay all voiced serious objections to any increased military cooperation on the drugs issue, and again rejected the idea of a multilateral force. This document expresses a more cautious approach to the drugs issue, with a set of recommendations based on the principle of shared responsibility, that gives priority to reducing demand for drugs with health education programs, placing equal emphasis on chemical or pharmaceutical drugs and those of natural origin. On the supply side, the document stresses the issues of alternative development and poverty eradication, giving special attention to processing chemical and money laundering controls, etc. Concern about pressures to implement repressive measures and the violation of sovereignty is explicitly mentioned: In the case of drugs of natural origin, comprehensive measures such as alternative development, law enforcement, and eradication, among others, could be applied The document calls for these measures to be applied with respect for the particular conditions and circumstances in each country. It will be the exclusive responsibility of each government to determine, implement and enforce these measures in accordance with their national programs and internal legal order. The controversial issue of aerial spraying, heavily promoted by Washington and in applied in the US, Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Panama, Colombia provoking a mass uprising , Venezuela and very recently in Peru, is fully ignored, apart from the reference that: In the execution of supply reduction programs, the countries will give special attention to the ecological aspects of the problem, so as to provide protection for the environment. In the chapter on Control Measures, no reference at all is made to a possible role for the military. The possibility of military involvement was only indirectly mentioned: The countries of the hemisphere also recognize that implementation of national programs and effective international cooperation in the area of information exchange, training and the conduct of operations to detect, track and confiscate these illicit shipments are, inter alia, important aspects of a comprehensive strategy to be developed with due respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each country. The European countries' strategy against drugs in Latin America is often referred to as a counterbalance to the militarized US approach. Focus is on trade and developmental measures, such as the special trade preference regime for Andean and Central American countries, on strengthening the legal systems and providing support for the prevention and health education programs to reduce drug consumption. Direct support for controversial aspects like forced eradication, aeril spraying or military operations, is generally avoided. An analysis of the differences between the seemingly cautious European approach to the drugs issue in Latin America and the US strategy, however, must take into account several factors: In the first place, direct criticism from Europe regarding US policies towards Latin America is very rare, even though these policies seem to contradict European policy in other areas. Secondly, because Europe has few strategic interests in Latin America, the issue of drugs does not overlap with security concerns, as is clearly the case with US drug policy in the region. European security interests lie elsewhere and hence the link between drugs and security issues applies to other regions, notably the Maghreb region of North Africa, Turkey, the Balkans and Eastern Europe. Thirdly, the European unification process has not yet reached a stage in which member states fully coordinate their foreign and security policies. The Maastricht Treaty does call for a Common Foreign and Security Policy, explicitly mentioning the drugs issue as a possible area for joint action. How this strategy develops is at this point hard to predict. In the meantime, very little information is available about international anti-drugs activities of individual member states. Clear examples, however, exist of cooperation far beyond the balanced approach put forth in European policy documents, including Britain's provision of supplies to the UMOPAR patrols in Bolivia, or the deployment of British military in Colombia. Although was marked by advances in diplomatic initiatives and declarations of good intentions, it was also a year plagued by disturbing events that indicate further military involvement in the war on drugs. The US, in bilateral negotiations with Latin American governments, has conditioned assistance programs upon further military involvement in the anti-drug war, bringing about a growing willingness on the part of Latin American governments to involve their military in such activities. Among the special rewards given out by the US in the second half of are: the increased US budget for drug programs, special military aid packages including armed helicopters for Mexico , the lifting of the ban to directly provide military equipment to the Peruvian Armed Forces, and plans to provide the Argentine military access to state-of-the-art weapons and equipment aircraft and missiles , and the approval of a major sale of armed helicopters to Colombia see articles by Coletta Youngers and Adriana Rossi. The contract, of course, states that these may not be used for purposes other than counternarcotics operations, but government officials have confirmed that they lack verification procedures to prevent this from happening. And a US Government Accounting Office report released in June , Drug Control: Counternarcotics Efforts in Mexico, stated: During the uprising in the Mexican State of Chiapas, several US-provided helicopters were used to transport Mexican military personnel to the conflict, which was a violation of the transfer agreement. In a period of mounting tensions in several Mexican states, this situation is likely to repeat. In the words of outgoing Defense Secretary William Perry: When it comes to stability and security our destinies are indissolubly linked.. In Colombia, the cause for concern is even greater. Suspecting that US military anti-drug aid might be directly used in human rights violations in Colombia, Amnesty compiled a list of military units with a history of proven violations. They then asked the State Department to verify whether any of these units had received US military equipment. Amnesty never got an official answer, but three confidential documents reflecting the investigation that followed where leaked to them. In one of the documents, Colonel Warren D. One of the other documents listed the very same military units from the Amnesty list, along with a detailed description of the US-supplied military equipment they had received. All but one of the brigades mentioned had received US military assistance. In her contribution, Coletta Youngers provides more background to the strengthening of US-Colombian military ties, despite the decertified status of the Colombian government. Although the human rights situation in Colombia is without doubt the wost on the continent, violations of human rights connected to the fight against drugs show a systematic pattern, as does the endemic impunity provided those involved. For example, the hiring of the probable assassin of archbishop Romero afterwards as a trainer for a special anti-drugs unit in El Salvador, or his eye-witness accounts of the torturing of suspected drug traffickers by the Guatemalan military intelligence G-2 , which inevitably end in the death of suspects. Theo Roncken provides a detailed account of human rights violations connected to the drug war in Bolivia. A consistent element in throughout his description is the persistence of impunity for human rights violators, from the days of the dictatorships into the current anti-drugs efforts and even extending to protect officials involved in the illegal business itself. As the Bolivian case shows and Mexico for that matter structures of impunity are not the exclusive reserve of the military. Although Bolivia was among the first to create a legal framework allowing for military participation, the war on drugs is still primarily fought by special police units. In politically unstable situations or periods of transition toward a democratic regime, those sectors in society who see their traditional power base threatened often seek independent funding sources to help them resist these changes. From the perspective of drug trafficking organizations - always in search of new and more secure trading routes - periods of political transition provide opportunities for making alliances with threatened sectors - often military officials. This can result in a highly destabilizing mixture of organized crime and political violence, especially during transitions in which the repressive apparatus is being dismantled. Existing organized crime structures do not just provide a life-line for demobilized military and intelligence personnel, but also offer them an ideal infrastructure for pursuing their political agenda even once they are out of office. Drug traffickers and the most unsavory of the counterinsurgency operatives have often worked together. Such covert structures operating within the military or intelligence communities are difficult to dismantle, since they are able to privatize or at least partially their funding sources, if they need to for their survival. In its report, for example, the Joint Group in El Salvador established to investigate the resurgence of death squad-style political assassinations states that its findings have raised large questions regarding the current ties of persons earlier identified with The relationship between these powerful structures and politically motivated crimes is described as a serious danger to the country's social and political stability. Such links between political crime and organized crime structures are designed to make these organizations and their members unouchable. Most involved are still well connected to the more reactionary sectors of the armed forces or the intelligence apparatus, which provides them with a certain degree of protection. And the lead or gold approach, which combines sheer terror with drug-money bribes, provides a level of impunity similar to that enjoyed while they were still in office. The motives guiding their actions become an indistinguishable blend of private profit with political agendas. In Colombia, several regions are fully controlled by such paramilitary structures as described by Ricardo Vargas which is a factor contributing to the total disintegration of the nation-state. Similar narco-mini-states exist in Mexico, and smaller variants have been reported in Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Brazil and several small Caribbean islands. The selective killings directed against popular movement groups - carried out from within these groups - are not the only sources of destabilization. The more general inkillings, kidnapping, rape and robbery is in many countries reaching levels comparable to the social effects of a civil war. To complete the circle, the widespread popular demands for strong State measures to counterattack such violence tends to open the door for a more authoritarian leadership. Worldwide, wars have fuelled drug production and vice versa. The rapid global expansion of the illicit drug trade has cast its shadow over almost all armed conflicts today. The impact of the drug trade is often underestimated as a catalyst in pre-war crisis situations. The existence of heavily armed groups involved in the narcotics business seriously increases the risk of armed escalation. Since such groups have no qualms about provoking armed confrontations as a means of protecting their special interests. The existence of such drug trafficking structures also means the existence of pipelines into the area through which those exacerbating a crisis can be supplied from abroad. In each of the recent cases of Bosnia, Somalia, Ruanda and Chechenia there are indications that the presence of drug trafficking interests may have played a role during the pre-war crisis, the outbreak of initial hostilities and the early stages of the conflicts. The interdependent complex of the globalizing illegal drugs business and the militarization of the strategies employed to counter it, has caught the fragile process of democratization between two fires. It brings about a degree of collateral damage to the democratization process that can no longer be disregarded and that obliges the international community to profoundly evaluate the most repressive aspects of current anti-drugs policies and even to rethink the principles underlying the global prohibition regime. The Special Session on Drugs of the UN General Assembly, scheduled for June , will provide an apt forum for a critical assessment of the viability of the course the world has taken in confronting these problems. Given their historical record, the ongoing violation of human rights, their role in maintaining the deeply rooted structures of impunity throughout the continent and their systematic involvement in the drug trade itself, the region's armed forces are clearly a dubious partner in the war on drugs in Latin America. As their mission is redefined and their internal role is re-legitimized in order to safeguard democracy against the corrupting impact of the illegal drug traffic, the proponents of a greater role for the military in the drug war should keep in mind the saying: We have met the enemy It would be larger than international trade in oil, mineral fuels and lubricants, which together account for 9. On March 1, , President Clinton, following the recommendations of the US State Department, decertified Colombia, along with Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Burma and Nigeria, for not having shown a serious commitment in the fight against drugs. Criteria for this yearly certification procedure includes performance in the areas of: crop eradication, fight against corruption, extradition to the US of suspected drug criminals, law enforcement against trafficking cartels, and legislative measures against drug money laundering. Decertification makes a country ineligible for most forms of US bilateral assistance and obliges the US to vote against multilateral loans for those countries in international financial institutions. Additional means by which the US can increase pressure on a decertified country, include trade sanctions or visa restrictions for State officials. The law specifically allows US funding for drug programs to continue, so has no direct effect on anti-drug operations. Clair, IPS This is well documented for a number of cases. In the case of Bosnia, for example, it can be argued that the early stages of the crisis were heavily influenced by the pre-war involvement of the most extremist factions of both Croation and Serbian nationalists in Bosnia in transporting heroin from Turkey to Northern Europe. Once the crisis evolved, these factions intensified their involvement in the drug trade to finance their armies. And as the war developed, both the Serbian and Croatian States played a role, in support to their allies in Bosnia. As a result, all three countries are now plagued with seriously criminalized economies, and with powerful political crime organizations that are very difficult to get rid off. Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter. Authors Article by. Tags Human Rights and Drugs. Article: Newsletter banner Do you want to stay informed? Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Subscribe now. Hundreds of social struggles. Countless ideas turned into movement. Support us as we celebrate our 50th anniversary in Make a donation.

The Vitality of Mythical Numbers

Buy Heroin Bariloche

For years in teaching evidence for policy-making at Princeton and Yale, I used this article as the first item on my reading list. The conclusion that a particular policy number over-reaches has of course to be earned by some relevant evidence and not by the generality that policy numbers over-reach. Such evidence can sometimes come from simple calculations, approximations, and cross-checks, as Singer illustrates in his paper. It is generally assumed that heroin addicts in New York City steal some two to five billion dollars worth of property a year, and commit approximately half of all the property crimes. The estimate that half the property crimes are committed by addicts was originally attributed to a police official and has been used so often that it is now part of the common wisdom. The amount of property stolen by addicts is usually estimated in something like the following manner:. These calculations can be made with more or less sophistication. One can allow for the fact that the kind of addicts who make their living illegally typically spend upwards of a quarter of their time in jail, which would reduce the amount of crime by a quarter. A year-old ex-addict who had been addicted for 54 years, he had spent 30 of those years in prison. Some of what the addict steals is cash, none of which has to go to a fence. A large part of the cost of heroin is paid for by dealing in the heroin business, rather than stealing from society, and another large part by prostitution, including male addicts living off prostitutes. But what happens if you approach the question from the other side? What is the value of property stolen in New York City in any year? Somewhat surprisingly to me when I first asked, this turned out to be a difficult question to answer, even approximately. But it is clear that there is a very large volume of crime that is not reported; for example, shoplifting is not normally reported to the police. Much property loss to thieves is not reported to insurance companies either, and the insurance industry had no good estimate for total theft. It is clear that the two biggest components of addict theft are shoplifting and burglary. This includes automobiles, carpets, diamond rings, and other items not usually available to shoplifters. This number includes management embezzlers, stealing by clerks, shipping departments, truckers, etc. It is generally agreed that substantially more than half of the property missing from retail establishments is taken by employees, the remainder being lost to outside shoplifters. What about burglary? There are something like two and one- half million households in New York City. Suppose that on the average one out of five of them is robbed or burglarized every year. This takes into account that in some areas burglary is even more commonplace, and that some households are burglarized more than once a year. This would mean , burglaries a year. In some burglaries, of course, much larger amounts of property are taken, but these higher value burglaries are much rarer, and often are committed by non-addict professional thieves. Obviously, none of these estimated values is either sacred or substantiated. You can make your own estimate. The estimates here have the character that it would be very surprising if they were wrong by a factor of 10, and not very important for the conclusion if they were wrong by a factor of two. This is a good position for an estimator to be in. One of the most feared types of addict crime is property taken from the persons of New Yorkers in muggings and other forms of robbery. We can estimate this, too. Suppose that on the average, one person in 10 has property taken from his person by muggers or robbers each year. After all, there must be some thieves who are not addicts. It exceeds the amount of money spent annually on addict rehabilitation and other programs to prevent and control addiction. Furthermore, the value of the property stolen by addicts is a small part of the total cost to society of addict theft. A much larger cost is paid in fear, changed neighborhood atmosphere, the cost of precautions, and other echoing and re-echoing reactions to theft and its danger. Along the same lines, this exercise is another reminder that even responsible officials, responsible newspapers, and responsible research groups pick up and pass on as gospel numbers that have no real basis in fact. We are reminded by this experience that because an estimate has been used widely by a variety of people who should know what they are talking about, one cannot assume that the estimate is even approximately correct. But there is a much more important implication of the fact that there cannot be nearly so much addict theft as people believe. This implication is that there probably cannot be as many addicts as people believe. Most of the money paid for heroin bought at retail comes from stealing, and most addicts buy at retail. Therefore, the number of addicts is basically—although imprecisely—limited by the amount of theft. They are the ones who can afford big habits. While all the people on those lists are not still active addicts—many of them are dead or in prison—most people believe that there are many addicts who are not on any list. It is common to regard the estimate of , addicts in New York City as a very conservative one. Judianne Densen-Gerber was widely quoted in for her estimate that there would be over , teenage addicts by the end of the summer. And there are obviously many addicts of 20 years of age and more. He is the kind of person who looks and acts like the normal picture of an addict. We exclude here the people in the medical profession who are frequent users of heroin or other opiates, or are addicted to them, students who use heroin occasionally, wealthy people who are addicted but do not need to steal and do not frequent the normal addict hangouts, etc. The amount of property stolen by addicts suggests that the number of New York City street addicts may be more like 70, than ,, and almost certainly cannot be anything like the , number that is sometimes used. Several other simple ways of estimating the number of street addicts lead to a similar conclusion. Experience with the addict population has led observers to estimate that the average street addict spends a quarter to a third of his time in prison. Some students of the subject, such as Edward Preble and John J. Casey, Jr. This would imply that at any one time, one-quarter to one-third of the addict population is in prison, and that the total addict population can be estimated by multiplying the number of addicts who are in prison by three or four. Of course the number of addicts who are in prison is not a known quantity and, in fact, as we have indicated above, not even a very precise concept. However, one can make reasonable estimates of the number of addicts in prison and for this purpose we can include the addicts in various involuntary treatment centers. This number is approximately 14,,, which is quite compatible with an estimate of 70, total New York City street addicts. Another way of estimating the total number of street addicts in New York City is to use the demographic information that is available about the addict population. If there were 70, addicts, this would mean that 14, blacks between the ages of 16 and 25 are addicts. But altogether there are only about , blacks between the ages of 16 and 25 in the city—perhaps half of them living in poverty areas. This means that if there are 70, addicts in the city, one in 10 black youths are addicts, and if there are , addicts, nearly one in six are, and if there are , addicts, one in three. You can decide for yourself which of these degrees of penetration of the young black male group is most believable, but it is rather clear that the number of , addicts is implausible. Similarly, the total of 70, street addicts would imply 7, young Puerto Rican males are addicted, and the total number of Puerto Rican boys between the ages of 17 and 25 in New York City is about 70, None of the above calculations is meant in any way to downplay the importance of the problem of heroin addiction. Heroin is a terrible curse. When you think of the individual tragedy involved, 70, is an awfully large number of addicts. The main point of this article may well be to illustrate how far one can go in bounding a problem by taking numbers seriously, seeing what they imply, checking various implications against each other and against general knowledge such as the number of persons or households in the city. Small efforts in this direction can go a long way to help ordinary people and responsible officials to cope with experts of various kinds. Notes \[1\] Mythical numbers may be more mythical and have more vitality in the area of crime than in most areas. It turned out that there were 19 Panthers killed, ten of them by the police, and eight of these in situations where it seems likely that the Panthers took the initiative. More than one-half of the heroin consumed by these addicts, over a year, had been paid for by the sale of heroin. Reprinted with permission from The Public Interest, no. Copyright c by National Affairs, Inc. Because my daughter is an addict, I realized when I read the article that a major source of the money with which addicts buy drugs was not commented on. Many of the addicts I have met get most of their money for drugs by panhandling. One of the reasons so many mythical numbers involve crime statistics is that the decision to report a crime and the decision of how to classify it are highly discretionary. For example, child abuse was much less frequently reported fifty years ago. Have we had an avalanche of abuse because more is reported now, or are people more sensitized and aware of their rights, or are social workers and health care professionals trained to look for it more readily, or are some kids, after being made aware of the consequences of making the accusations, using the charge to accomplish their own agendas? It would be nice to have a similarly pentetrating analysis of the huge estimates of the losses that software and music publishers claim they suffer as a consequence of illegal copying. Illegal copying is not a good thing, of course, but I suspect that the main people who suffer from it are the people who pay the prices demanded by publishers, and not the publishers themselves. Before that it never occurred to me to ask how the software like operating systems and compilers that were built into university mainframe computers was paid for. If I thought about it all I probably thought the price of the software was included in the price of the machine. Having learnt a bit more since then about Polish notation I realize that writing a compiler might be marginally less difficult than I thought, but still more difficult than writing a word-processor. Yet 20 years ago one could buy a perfectly serviceable compiler for a PC Turbo Pascal, for example for a far lower price than one needed to pay for a word-processor. As far as I can see the only explanation is that the prices have nothing to do with profit margins or with the amount of investment that was in the development, but everything to do with what the market will stand. Re-reading this, I fear that in the second paragraph I have drifted away from the topic, but I hope it will stand up as an illustration of why the analysis asked in the first paragraph would be worth having. Another case is to be found in vol. Of the 24 forecasts, one was spot on, but all the others underestimated the actual results. Every year we have dire predictions of the catastrophic yields that farmers are going to have, and every year they survive to complain again the following year. At least, volume I is. I never bought volumes II and III, but my recollection from library copies is that they were much heavier going. On the new Johns Hopkins University study estimating , Iraqi deaths, far more than the official estimate of 30, does the new study over-reach? Or does the official estimate under-reach? Mortality after the invasion of Iraq: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey by Prof. Iraqi Death Count: ,? How to read the latest study on mortality in Iraq. See the excellent debunking story by Fred H. Cate in the Washington Post. For good, practical advice on effective analytical thinking, see here. Not that it invalidates the conclusions. Great stuff. I will be using the Singer paper in a class I teach on policy analysis. Both are useful for discussions about definitions e. The kind of reasoning Singer does is what many people call Fermi Problems. They can be fun to go over in class, too. Enrico Fermi not only estimated the number of piano tuners in Chicago, one of his most famous estimates was the one he made during the first atom bomb test on 16 July, There was an important question in the minds of the bomb makers on the yield of this new class of weapon. During the test Fermi estimated that it was about 10 kilotons. Using this data and some assumptions he made his estimate. It was surprisingly accurate. Not only to the correct order of magnitude, but within a very respectable factor of 2. The actual yield was 19 kilotons. On June 4 the Puyehue-Cordon Caulle volcanic system produced a pyroclastic subplinian eruption reaching level 3 in the volcanic explosivity index. The first stage of the eruption released sand and ashes that affected small towns and cities in the surrounding areas, including San Carlos de Bariloche, in Argentina, one of the largest cities in the North Patagonian Andean region. By treating the eruption as a Fermi problem, we estimated the volume and mass of sand ejected as well as the energy and power released during the eruptive phase. We then put the results in context by comparing the obtained values with everyday quantities, like the load of a cargo truck or the electric power produced in Argentina. These calculations have been done as a pedagogic exercise, and after evaluation of the hypothesis was done in the classroom, the calculations have been performed by the students. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Box Cheshire, CT The Vitality of Mythical Numbers. August 16, Edward Tufte. Journalists pick up, quote, and repeat scary numbers in faux-trend stories. Topics: E. ET says:. August 16, at pm. Rod says:. August 17, at pm. Karl Hartkopf says:. August 21, at am. Athel Cornish-Bowden says:. August 25, at am. John Galada says:. October 13, at pm. Edward Tufte says:. October 14, at pm. December 17, at pm. July 2, at am. January 2, at pm. George V. Reilly says:. January 9, at pm. Doug says:. September 8, at pm. Matt R says:. September 9, at am. Box Cheshire, CT or tufte graphicspress.

Buy Heroin Bariloche