Brooke Shields Nude Pretty Baby Gif

Brooke Shields Nude Pretty Baby Gif

Saturday, Oct 15th 2022
3PM
9°C
6PM
6°C

5-Day Forecast

Embed icon

Embed Most Watched Videos

By embedding this you agree to our terms and conditions

Cancel
Copy code
Tick icon

Code copied

Site
Web

Enter search term:
Search

Truss and Hunt set to hash out economic plans at Chequers in bid to avert leadership threats
Liz Truss latest news: Taxes will go up, warns Jeremy Hunt - watch Andrew Bailey live
Miriam Margolyes says ‘f*** you, bastard’ live on Radio 4’s Today over Jeremy Hunt
Mason Greenwood 'arrested on suspicion of breaching bail conditions'
Turkish mine explosion kills 40 and leaves many trapped
Charlotte Crosby shares first snaps after giving birth to baby girl
Furious driver with 'sick wife' berates Just Stop Oil protestors
Two women charged after soup thrown over Van Gogh's Sunflowers painting
Heartbroken village says its final farewells to five-year-old girl
London mortgage bills may ‘rise by £8,000 a year’, warns think-tank

Home

News

U.S.

Sport

TV&Showbiz

Australia

Femail

Health

Science

Money

Travel

Video

Best Buys

Discounts

By Paul Revoir for MailOnline Updated: 11:15 BST, 1 October 2009
Child abuse campaigners are furious at Tate Modern gallery's decision to show an 'obscene' picture of a naked 10-year-old Brooke Shields.
Yesterday critics called for the image of the star to be withdrawn from the new exhibition, which opens tomorrow, saying it was unacceptable.
They claimed the picture would attract paedophiles to the gallery and said organisers should have taken advice from parents before deciding to show it.
Gallery chiefs themselves admit they sought legal advice before including the picture, titled Spiritual America, in the Pop Life: Art In A Material World show.
The exhibition also features huge sexually explicit images of penetration and works made from the pages of pornographic magazines.
Then and now: A 12-year-old Brooke Shields in the 1978 film Pretty Baby (left), and at a party last month at 44 (right). MailOnline chose not to show the portrait of naked 10-year-old Shields before it was removed from the Tate Modern
Richard Prince's image of Shields shows her from the knees up, naked, oiled and wearing make-up, looking directly at the viewer.
It is hung in a special room at the south London gallery with a notice on the door warning visitors they may find the image 'challenging'.
The artist himself described the 1983 work, which is in fact a photograph of a photograph taken by another artist, Gary Gross, as 'an extremely complicated photo of a naked girl who looks like a boy made up to look like a woman'.
Prince's picture was originally shown anonymously in a disused shop in a run-down area of New York, and the Tate show is believed to be the work's first appearance in a UK gallery.
The original Gross picture was taken after the artist hired Shields to pose as a model in 1975 and is said to have been done with her mother's consent.
Full on: American artist Jeff Koons' Dirty-Jeff On Top' statue stands in front of Made In Heaven, at the Pop Life, Art In A Material World exhibition to be staged at the Tate Modern
When the photographer later tried to republish the pictures in the 1980s Shields and her mother launched a legal battle to stop him, but he won the case.
Michele Elliott founder of children's charity Kidscape criticised the gallery's decision to exhibit the picture as a work of art.
She said: 'This is the kind of excuse people make for showing soft kiddy porn and I can't think anyone would want their child portrayed this way and I think it is obscene to do so. She is not old enough at that age to give consent for this to be taken.
'This has been put in a pouty adult way, it sounds like, and to masquerade under the guise of edgy art is ridiculous. It is soft kiddy porn.
'Putting a sign on the door like that means every paedophile in the land will head straight to that room.'
She added: 'I don't care if they show naked adults, I have got no trouble with nudity, but I do have trouble with children being portrayed in sexually provocative ways. They should have stuck with their gut feeling and excluded this work.'
Religious groups have also hit out at the decision.
Simon Calvert, a spokesman for The Christian Institute added: 'I think that any parent of young girls would just be so shocked to hear that a tax-payer funded
gallery thinks it is alright to show photographs of a nude ten-year-old in the middle of a pornography exhibition.
In your face: A visitor photographs an installation by Japanese artist Takashi Murakami during a preview of the Pop Life exhibition
'How far do things have to go before we eventually say enough is enough.'
'They took legal advice to see what they could get away with. Why didn't they take advice from ordinary parents and the public as to what's appropriate.'
Jack Bankowsky, the exhibitions co-curator, said he hoped the artistic interest in Spiritual America would not be overshadowed by controversy over its content.
He said: 'I hope that people respond to what is provocative and understand what the artist was trying to achieve.
'If it turned into that kind of brouhaha it would overwhelm the work and become a monosyllabic conversation.'
Visual impact This installation by American Keith Haring is less pornographic but still hard to take in
Prince wanted the viewer to respond to the 'eeriness' of Gross' original image, Mr Bankowsky said.
A spokesman for the Tate said they had given careful consideration to the work and the reaction it could provoke before including it in the exhibition.
'As with any artwork that contains challenging imagery, Tate has sought legal advice and evaluated the situation,' the spokesman said.
'Tate has taken measures to inform visitors of the nature of the work, providing information outlining the intentions of the artist.
'This is an important work by Richard Prince which has been publicly exhibited on a number of occasions, most recently in Richard Prince's major retrospective, Spiritual America, at the Guggenheim in New York."
The comments below have been moderated in advance.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.
Published by Associated Newspapers Ltd
Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday & Metro Media Group

All Titles TV Episodes Celebs Companies Keywords Advanced Search
Fully supported English (United States) Partially supported Français (Canada) Français (France) Deutsch (Deutschland) हिंदी (भारत) Italiano (Italia) Português (Brasil) Español (España) Español (México)
« Previous

1
2
3

Next »

« Previous

1
2
3

Next »

Type

Still Frame (87) Product (6) Poster (5) Behind The Scenes (2) Production Art (1) Publicity (1)

Person

Brooke Shields
(60)
Keith Carradine
(23)
Susan Sarandon
(14)
Frances Faye
(8)
Antonio Fargas
(3)
Barbara Steele
(2)
Matthew Anton
(2)
C.C. Courtney
(1)
Cheryl Markowitz
(1)
Diana Scarwid
(1)
Don Lutenbacher
(1)
Henry Braden
(1)
Joe Catalanotto
(1)
Louis Malle
(1)
Seret Scott
(1)
Susan Manskey
(1)
Von Eric Thomas
(1)

Details

Full Cast and Crew

Release Dates

Official Sites

Company Credits

Filming & Production

Technical Specs

Storyline

Taglines

Plot Summary

Synopsis

Plot Keywords

Parents Guide

Did You Know?

Trivia

Goofs

Crazy Credits

Quotes

Alternate Versions

Connections

Soundtracks

Opinion

Awards

FAQ

User Reviews

User Ratings

External Reviews

Metacritic Reviews

Related Items

News

Showtimes

External Sites

A teenage girl lives as a prostitute in New Orleans in 1917.

A cropped version of the original 1976 picture of Brooke Shields, taken for Playboy by Gary Gross
Allow microphone access to enable voice search
If the idea that such a photo exists is a little dizzying to you, its origins might make you downright queasy. Prince's work is actually a photograph of another photograph-one that Brooke's mother Teri authorized for a Playboy publication called Sugar 'n' Spice in return for $450 in 1976.
Now, as a mom, there is a lot that is cringe-worthy about this bit of information for me (a ten-year old ? Playboy ? $450 ?), especially in light of the recent hubbub Stateside about parental judgment vis-à-vis what could be child pornography . Why on earth would a mother put her daughter through that? What kind of parent does that to a minor?
Looking further into Brooke Shields early acting career didn't really comfort me.
Between her nude scenes as a girl in a brothel in Pretty Baby at age 12, telling the world "nothing [got] between" her and her Calvin's at age 14, and having to testify before Congress at age 15 that it was, in fact, a body double that did all that steamy lovemaking in the Blue Lagoon , I started to wonder how Teri Shields had escaped the attention of Child Protective Services.
So you can imagine my surprise when I ran across this article from a 1978 issue of People Magazine . In it, almost 13-year-old Brooke Shields answers some pretty tough questions about her role in Pretty Baby in a disarming and age-appropriate way: "It's only a role. I'm not going to grow up and be a prostitute. If I were in a Walt Disney movie people would never ask me if the part would affect my life. That's so dumb."
Still really a child ("I don't even have my period yet"), Brooke attends Mass every week with her mother. Boys? "Sometimes they're really stupid, but other times they're okay." Until recently, Teri would allow Brooke only to double-date, though she can now go out alone. "But I don't want to go steady. My mom doesn't like it. I'm just not ready yet." Brooke shrugs off sex-"I knew all about that when I was 2. Mom told me." When Playboy asked her what "good in bed" meant to her, Brooke nonchalantly replied, "When I'm sick and I stay home from school propped up with lots of pillows watching TV and my mom brings me soup-that's good in bed."
Clearly, taking a People Magazine interview, or really any magazine interview as the end-all-be-all of a young girl's mental state is unwise at best. And again, this brings up many more indignant mom questions ( 2 ? Really ? Playboy asked what ?) But there's something truly surprising about reading Brooke Shields, the kid, talking about Brooke Shields, the sexual icon. She has a unique combination of innocence and perspective that I never would have believed possible for a girl in her situation. That she grew up to be a well-spoken, gracious woman and thoughtful mother , avoiding the kind of breakdowns reserved for young female sex symbols (think Britney Spears, or Lindsay Lohan) speaks volumes.
Does it take away the sick feeling I have about the original photo of taken of a nude, ten-year old Brooke Shields? No, it absolutely does not. It doesn't matter how well she has turned out, I shudder that the picture was ever taken and I feel bad for the older, grown-up Brooke Shields who tried to suppress it. But it does change what I think about the girl in that picture. She does not become the victim I imagine she will.
I can't think of another young actress who was more consistently sexualized from a young age, or seems less damaged by it. I also have to believe a pretty large portion of who Brooke Shields grew up to be, and who she is today has a lot to do with how her mother (who by all accounts was basically single-parenting) raised her. Which in turn makes me wonder: Is it possible that a mother who used such poor judgment in exploiting her young daughter was also a good parent to her during that same time period? Is it possible that the same woman who made a really bad decision to have her daughter photographed that way also helped her retain good boundaries and a strong sense of self?
It's not the answer I was looking for, but it's one I'm having trouble denying.
An Insider map shows the essential points Russia would have to attack to wipe out the US's nuclear forces, according to a nuclear weapons expert.
The Maryland Democrat gave no credence to Trump's reply to a subpoena from the House select committee probing the Jan. 6 insurrection.
These old life hacks prove that sometimes grandma knows best
Sportscaster Jessica Kaimu didn't know the world was watching when she reacted to the news anchor like this.
The use of the prop drew a rebuke from the moderator at the Senate rivals' debate: “You’re very well aware of the rules, aren’t you?”
SAVANNAH, Ga. – Sen. Raphael Warnock (D) and his Republican opponent, former football star Herschel Walker, faced off on Friday night for their first and likely only debate, using the face-to-face meeting to make their cases to voters just a few weeks before Election Day. The debate came amid a hectic final push by the…
I was all set for my trip, or so I thought. That's when my friend told me to place a crayon in my wallet when traveling. The reason is quite clever.
Kate Middleton and Prince William reportedly want a fourth child, and their friends wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement "early next year."
The clean-shaven look caught us off guard!
HANNAH MCKAY/ReutersOn Thursday, just 37 days after being appointed British finance minister, Kwasi Kwarteng was asked if, in a month’s time, he would still be in his job and Liz Truss would still be prime minister. “Absolutely, 100 percent,” Kwarteng answered. “I’m not going anywhere.”Less than a day later, he was gone. Truss’ Friday removal of Kwarteng—her closest ideological ally—from the second most powerful role in government so soon after choosing him to run the British economy is easily t
Answer These Personality Questions and We’ll Tell You What Sport You Should Get Into Next!
Pelosi said she worried about Pence still being in the Capitol building, and advised him to keep his location secret.
Okmulgee Police Chief Joe Prentice said "multiple" sets of human remains had been found amid a search for four missing Oklahoma men who vanished from a bike ride.
It is safe to get the updated COVID-19 booster and your annual flu shot at the same visit, but you might have a slightly higher risk of fatigue after.
You’ll Never Believe What It Grew Into...
We applaud some needed clarity in LIV's OWGR debate, celebrate golf's newest star and question Phil Mickelson’s gaslighting attempt.
KATERYNA TYSHCHENKO - SATURDAY, 15 OCTOBER 2022, 00:33 Lieutenant General Serhiy Naiev, Commander of the Joint Forces of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, reports that the number of mobilised the Russians have at hand is about 2 million, with a potential total of about 29 million.
On Nov. 11, 2020, Trump sought to leave a mess for his successor by rushing thousands of troops out of Afghanistan and Somalia before Biden's inauguration.
Learn to speak, read, and write Thai and Thai script with our easy and fun online course. Nine years of experience teaching individuals and groups.
The Charlotte Hornets forward showed up to training camp last month with a new fade that sent Twitter abuzz.
George Stephanopoulos recalled then-candidate Donald Trump had a fit off-camera over interview questions about Russia.
Olivia Wilde just posed semi-topless for an 'Elle' cover photo, and she is all-over strong and fierce. The actress often talks about women's immense strength.
The Ohio lawmaker gets called out for trying to deflect from the day's big news about Donald Trump.
"That she owns only one truly good bra."View Entire Post ›
Russell Wilson appreciated Marshawn Lynch's kind words toward his former teammate.

HOME

WATCH NOW

WATCH LIVE

WATCH MOVIES

SCHEDULE

DAILY SCHEDULE

MONTH SCHEDULE

THIS MONTH

EMAIL SIGN UP

Sub Navigation

MESSAGE BOARDS

PODCAST

FILM FESTIVAL

CLASSIC CRUISE

CLASSICS IN THEATERS

WINE CLUB

TCM LIBRARY

SILENT SUNDAY NIGHTS

NOIR ALLEY

HOME

Lesbian Pussy Licking Hard
Ftv Girls Cucumber Vk
Annabelle New Sex Video

Brooke Shields Nude Pretty Baby Gif

Report Page