Black Woman Pov

Black Woman Pov

Boston University
More Publications

Voices & Opinion

POV: Where Are the Tenured Black Female Professors?

What we need to do to support Black women in academia

a white man with a Stanford Ph.D. in a physical science

A WHITE MAN WITH A STANFORD PH.D. IN A PHYSICAL SCIENCE

A WHITE MAN WITH A STANFORD PH.D. IN A PHYSICAL SCIENCE

Climate Change

Amid Climate Change, BU Researchers Study Chelsea’s “Heat Island”

History & Politics

Was the Patriot Front March in Boston a Sign of the New KKK?

Movie Quiz

How Did You Do on Our Thor: Love and Thunder Trivia Quiz?

Sexual Education

With Roe v. Wade Gone, Would Better Sex Ed Help Avert Unwanted Pregnancies?

New Music

New Music July 2022: Local Boston Concerts, New Album Releases

FYSOP

Enrollment Now Open for 2022 First-Year Student Outreach Project (FYSOP)

Things-to-do

To Do This Weekend: Seaport Summer Market

Food & Dining

Getting to Know Your Neighborhood: East Boston

Things-to-do

Spend a Free Night Stargazing at the Coit Observatory

Environment

The Supreme Court Has Hobbled Greenhouse Gas Controls. Now What?

First-Gen

Newbury Center Launches First-Generation Student Magazine

Things-to-do

To Do Today: Brilliant Trash at the ICA Watershed

Voices & Opinion

POV: Can We Love a Country Even When It Falls Short?

Things-to-do

Boston 4th of July Events: How to Celebrate this Weekend

Reproductive Rights

How the End of Roe v. Wade Will Be Felt across BU Campus

Water Safety

Top Water Safety Tips for Kids from a FitRec Expert

Voices & Opinion

POV: Plaudits to Lizzo for Changing the Word “Spaz” in Her New Song “Grrrls”

Health & Medicine

So Much News: Should You Turn it Off or Turn it Up?

LGBTQ+

My Coming Out Story: Vincent Stephens

Faculty & Staff

Is Flexible Work Working for You? BU Wants to Know

© Boston University. All rights reserved. www.bu.edu

Notice of Non-Discrimination: Boston University policy prohibits discrimination against any individual on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, military service, pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition, or because of marital, parental, or veteran status, and acts in conformity with all applicable state and federal laws. This policy extends to all rights, privileges, programs and activities, including admissions, financial assistance, educational and athletic programs, housing, employment, compensation, employee benefits, and the providing of, or access to, University services or facilities. See BU’s Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Policy .

POV: Where Are the Tenured Black Female Professors?

Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Email check failed, please try again

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Black female faculty are scarce. But what role do you play in diversifying campuses, facilitating opportunities, and amplifying Black female voices in research and classrooms?
A recent Chronicle of Higher Education article reported that as of the fall of 2019, only 2.1 percent of tenured associate and full professors at US universities and colleges were Black women. A Boston Globe story noted that Boston University has 700 tenured faculty members, 7 of whom are Black women. This isn’t quite the elite 1 percent to which people aspire. How did we get here?
Some inappropriately blame Black women, arguing that the metrics for tenure are clear, and if they fail to “measure up,” then they do not deserve tenure. This mindset supports and reinforces the actual answer—systemic racism and a false reliance in the meritocracy myth. In the Jim Crow era, “whites only” signage was used to keep Blacks out of certain spaces. Today, the illustrious “ivory tower” remains one of the whitest spaces in America—educating our children, shaping minds, and perpetuating societal problems for generations. While universities lack visible discriminatory markings, they often use the false pretense of “merit” and “qualifications” as gatekeepers to maintain the status quo.
Black women experience institutional barriers at every stage of the academic process, starting with admission into graduate programs, yielding a small pool of credentialed graduates available for tenure-track faculty positions. Then the tenure process further culls the herd. Many non-Black faculty fail to recognize the system at work and their personal complicity in proactively upholding it. Instead, they choose to believe that people’s success is primarily linked to their own achievements, instead of acknowledging that the system was specifically designed to work for them and affirm the continual advancement of white scholars at the expense of Black and brown achievement.
To gain tenure, professors are expected to establish themselves as nationally recognized scholars in their field. The core criteria for determining tenure are (1) teaching, (2) research, and (3) service. While this sounds fair on the surface, each of these benchmark categories is fraught with bias against those from systematically marginalized groups (SMGs).
Teaching excellence is often assessed using student evaluations. However, students themselves often discount the credentials, credibility, and authority of faculty from SMGs. There are numerous studies demonstrating that race, gender, nationality, course topic, and even the time when classes meet can negatively impact the scores professors receive. Given prejudices, this does not bode well for Black women , since being white and male garner the highest scores.
Publications are a key measure of scholarship and productivity, yet here again research from several major publishing houses shows significant biases against women authors and those from SMGs . Studies also show that papers with female authors are less cited than those written by men. It is also often extremely challenging for SMGs working on topics based on race to get editors from major journals to even consider publishing their work, due to prejudice. As a result, SMG faculty publish their work in specialized journals that are lesser-known to their white colleagues, which tend to be looked upon less favorably. Recently, the University of Virginia denied tenure to Black professor Paul Harris , claiming he failed to meet the expectations for publishing. The promotion committee discredited his peer-reviewed publications in the Journal of African American Males in Education by calling them “self-published.”
The number and quality of invitations to conferences and department colloquia are also critical to getting tenure. Yet, who gets invited is typically based on professional networks that Black women frequently lack full access to. Similarly, young investigator awards tend to be awarded based on the applicant’s pedigree rather than actual accomplishments. Here again, Black women are disadvantaged, as they rarely attend institutions that get them short-listed for these honors.
In many departments, securing external funding is necessary for tenure. But again, there is tremendous bias against Blacks in the peer-review process of research proposals. One study examined funding outcomes for the National Institutes of Health, the largest funding agency in the United States, and found Blacks were 25 percent less likely to be funded relative to white applicants. One perceived reason was that research on topics related to Blacks and other SMGs was not viewed favorably by reviewers.
Service is often the least valued category for tenure decisions. Most institutions say faculty should spend about 10 percent of their time on supporting the institution outside of their “day jobs.” However, universities lean heavily on faculty of color—overburdening them and demanding higher levels of service without just reward and adequate recognition. This happens since campuses lack diversity and then repeatedly turn to the handful of professors of color to carry the load, assisting on efforts like diversity committees, recruiting efforts, and mentoring. Much of this disproportionate service falls on Black women. While many Black women find work like mentoring rewarding, this work does not enhance their dossiers and takes up significant time that could and should be better invested in their scholarship. Tenure committees rarely give appropriate credit for this service and unfair overtaxing.
The additive effect of these disparities can be damaging. In addition, the standard for tenure is not as clear-cut as many would think. Since faculty are still evolving at that stage in their careers, an often-used scale is the demonstration of a positive upward trajectory—meaning evidence that the faculty member’s career is on track and looks promising for continued growth and success. This is a sliding scale and can be applied leniently to some and harshly to others. Most academic institutions have a mixture of faculty—some are superstars, and others are good role players. Black women are not afforded the liberty of mediocrity that some of their majority counterparts enjoy. They are seldom forgiven for any blemishes in their records, even when a whole system is working against them. The extremely small numbers of Black women faculty, especially at the rank of professor, means that it is unlikely that there will be any involved in the review process. Thus, Black women often do not have an advocate in the room to provide context.
This summer, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill denied Nikole Hannah-Jones , a Pulitzer Prize–winning author and MacArthur “genius” award recipient, a tenured faculty appointment as a Knight Chair in Race and Investigative Journalism. This, even though all previous Knight chairs—most of whom are white males—were hired with tenure. The incident gained national attention, as many in the academy wondered why an institution would have such a double standard. However, some of us already knew the answer—because she is Black and writes about systemic racism and America’s complex history starting from slavery.
For Black women in the academy, Jones was a modern-day Rosa Parks, bringing attention to the significant underrepresentation of Black women within the ranks of tenured faculty in the academy. Her situation highlighted the fact that Black women often pay the same fare, or even a higher price, for acceptance into faculty ranks, yet are seldom offered the validation of their efforts with tenure.
As Bishop Desmond Tutu said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.” So, I ask that you do not sit quietly and observe these systems of oppression at work. Instead, strive to support Black women by: 1) advocating for classroom visits to review teaching quality instead of student evaluations; 2) lobbying the major publishing groups in your field to take steps to mitigate bias in peer review; 3) inviting Black women to speak in department colloquia or conferences; 4) collaborating with them and inviting them to participate in large research grants; 5) citing their work when appropriate, and calling out others who fail to do so; 5) keeping promotion and tenure discussions on track by shutting down inequitable lines of inquiry; and 6) stop asking Black women to do unpaid labor.
Upon learning about an endangered animal species, many Americans would go to great lengths to ensure protections for their survival and recovery, and population growth. I need you all to keep that same energy when it comes to Black female faculty. It is time for all faculty to acknowledge their role in the system and work towards change.
Malika Jeffries-EL is a College of Arts & Sciences associate professor of chemistry and associate dean of the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences; she can be reached at malikaj@bu.edu .
“POV” is an opinion page that provides timely commentaries from students, faculty, and staff on a variety of issues: on-campus, local, state, national, or international. Anyone interested in submitting a piece, which should be about 700 words long, should contact John O’Rourke at orourkej@bu.edu . BU Today reserves the right to reject or edit submissions. The views expressed are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent the views of Boston University.
POV: Where Are the Tenured Black Female Professors?
Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

May current and future Black women in the academia be embraced by solidarity on every side and from head to toe. If you’re saying “Black Lives Matter” then prove it.
An outstanding summary of the state of the field. Thank you, Professor Jeffries-EL.
I had to stop reading this because it basically insinuated (even if you didn’t mean to) that black women are less intelligent or less skilled than whites and need a leg up by “changing the rules” to get more of them into academia. This is not true, we are all equal and need to start acting as such. Help the black community with educational programs at an early age. Keep fathers in the home. Reduce the poverty rate. Lower the crime rate and thus lower the incarceration rate. THEN you will be successful in your mission. As a Mexican, I refuse to believe that the rules are “too tough” for me to be successful or that I need help getting admitted into a school or even finding a good job. It’s all about work ethic. Even though I grew up poor, I was not willing to stay that way!
Thank you for for your comments. I agree completely!
I believe you’ve misconstrued the whole of her argument, which is sound. Good research is done by world-majority people and it is questioned and dismissed because it focuses on underrepresented people. This is more so about the centering of European norms by traditionally European institutions who are marketing diversity and inclusion to students and may in fact be increasing the diversity of the student population, while still remaining rigid in the advent of new journals in which these works are published. The gatekeeping is addressed; the rest of your sentiment seems to lead by preconceived notions.
Thanks so much for this cogent and powerful POV. Your suggestions for a path forward all also in-line with what many of our peers have recognized: the traditional T&P process needs restructuring, especially with respect to DEI.
Thank you so much for sharing this perspective. This is absolutely a systemic issue. The denial of Nikole Hannah-Jones’ tenure this summer was certainly eye-opening for me. Academia needs to do a better job of recognizing, rewarding, and uplifting diverse voices – specifically Black women. I pledge to do better.
Bravo! Add to this the demands of parenthood and supporting extended family, and a more complete picture of the obstacles begins to emerge. I wish I could do more than watch in empathy and amazement.
I often read POV topics published in BU Today without commenting, but lately I feel compelled to respond because of the (now) routinely uncurbed predilection of the featured authors… The viewpoints expressed by this particular author are full of baseless and unsubstantiated claims and clichés that would not stand up to any reasonable or rational scrutiny… “meritocracy myth”? “systemic racism”? “ivory tower”? Really? ” The reader comments also are amazingly naïve, except the remarks by “Jose”…. The circumstances one grows up in need not impede one’s achievements… Yes, some are more fortunate than others, not something we can control, but anyone who excels in their chosen field (i.e. merit) and has good work ethics and determination while following the “golden rule” will succeed without doubt… This applies not only to academia, but to all professions… We cannot continue to ignore the plethora of highly successful individuals of color (any) that are deservedly rewarded for their hard work and talents… Although it seems easier to blame history or other people for our own flaws or failures, allowing us to feel better and less responsible, it still doesn’t make it right…The unrelenting blanket excuse of biased victimhood is just that: an excuse.
There is a large body of quantitative data (from, e.g., the NSF) strongly supporting the author’s points. You, on the other hand, present a philosophical argument based on your own personal feelings. Your response suggests you have little/no experience with academia. I normally don’t respond to comments like yours, but I feel that it is important that laypeople (like yourself, I suspect) understand the gravity of these issues, and that there is no substance to your vague and platitudinous response.
Thank you for your comments “white man with a Stanford PhD”… you are certainly entitled to your opinion… However, the quantitative data you refer to (from, e.g. the NSF – I’m assuming you mean the National Science Foundation) without “qualitative” data proves nothing… you must surely understand this, having a PhD… While I comprehend the author’s points (and yours) there are plenty of ambiguities and personal feelings displayed there, which is why my comments were more of a philosophical nature… Peace
Rex, I reiterate that your opinion is uninformed and lacking in substance. There is of course a large body of *qualitative* data that provides detailed context for the aforementioned quantitative data on racial/gender gaps in STEM. People have spent their entire careers studying these problems. If you were to consult the primary literature in this field, you would find that th
Hd Porn Vid
Ageplaystories Reddit
Written Incest Porn

Black Woman Pov

Report Page