Black Hole Spy
⚡ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Black Hole Spy
Subscribe
Renew
Shop
Subscribe
Give a Gift
Renew
''
Smart News
History
Science
Innovation
Arts & Culture
Travel
History
Archaeology
U.S. History
World History
Untold Stories of American History
Video
Newsletter
Science
Human Behavior
Mind & Body
Our Planet
Space
Wildlife
Newsletter
Innovation
Innovation for Good
Education
Energy
Health & Medicine
Technology
Video
Newsletter
Arts & Culture
Museum Day
Art
Books
Design
Food
Music & Film
Video
Newsletter
Travel
Alaska
Virtual Travel
Journeys
Newsletter
At The Smithsonian
Visit
Exhibitions
New Research
Artifacts
Curators' Corner
Ask Smithsonian
Podcasts
Voices
Newsletter
Photos
Photo Contest
Instagram
Video
Ingenuity Awards
Ask Smithsonian
Smithsonian Channel
Games
Daily Sudoku
Universal Crossword
Daily Word Search
Jumble
Mah Jong Quest
KenKen
Backgammon
New observations suggest that black holes cycle between activity and rest
Black holes are notoriously messy eaters, blasting the scraps of shredded stars as enormous belches of gas and dust. Now, for the first time, astronomers spotted the same black hole letting out two hearty burps.
"Black holes are voracious eaters, but it also turns out they don't have very good table manners," astronomer Julia M. Comerford said during a news conference at the American Astronomical Society's winter meeting, Sarah Lewin reports for Space.com . "We know a lot of examples of black holes with single burps emanating out, but we discovered a galaxy with a supermassive black hole that has not one but two burps."
It’s not uncommon for astronomers to observe the aftermath of a black hole guzzling down a star—while most of the material is lost behind its event horizon (what Lewin aptly calls the "point of no return"), traces of its meal are burped out in high-energy jets of particles that are blasted into space. Astronomers have long theorized that supermassive black holes—the black holes millions to billions times the mass of the sun that lurk in the center of galaxies—go through periods of activity and quiescence, a cycle of feeding and naps over enormous timescales.
Now, a team of researchers led by Comerford have witnessed the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy about 800 million light-years from Earth emitting these jets twice, the scientists write in an article for The Astrophysical Journal . The Hubble Space Telescope imaged the black hole in visible light and the Chandra X-ray Observatory scanned it using X-rays. The space telescopes captured two gas bubbles shocked by jets of fast-moving particles.
One was a cloud of blue-green gas. It was ionized, meaning its electrons were stripped from its atoms, Paul Rincon reports for BBC , which suggests that the cloud was blasted by radiation from the black hole. Researchers measured the cloud lingering some 30,000 light-years from the black hole, and during its lengthy time of traveling the "burp" had plenty of time to expand.
The younger burp, however, is a small loop that’s only 3,000 light-years from the black hole, Lewis writes. The two clouds were the result of two different feeding episodes for the black hole with a 100,000 year resting period in between. The long period between events matches computer models of how black holes feed, Lewis reports.
"Imagine someone eating dinner at their kitchen table and they're eating and burping, eating and burping,” Comerford tells Ricon. "You walk in the room and you notice there's an old burp still hanging in the air from the appetizer course. Meanwhile, they're eating the main course and they let out a new burp that's rocking the kitchen table."
The same situation could be happening with Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole in the center of our home Milky Way galaxy. "Right now, our galaxy's supermassive black hole is firmly in the nap phase of the feast-burp-nap cycle, but it's just waiting for its next meal to come along," Comerford tells Lewis. "In the future, it will probably feast and burp once again."
While high-energy jets emerging from black holes can be dangerous to anything nearby, the solar system is sufficiently on the outskirts of the Milky Way, so we won't be at risk if Sagittarius A* awakens for a snack.
Mika McKinnon
| READ MORE
© 2022 Smithsonian Magazine
Privacy Statement
Cookie Policy
Terms of Use
Advertising Notice
Manage My Data
Cookie Settings
icon-captions-off CC icon-captions-on CC icon-enter-fullscreen icon-exit-fullscreen icon-fast-forward icon-muted icon-pause icon-play icon-restart Created with Sketch. rewind Created with Sketch. icon-volume
Scientific American is part of Springer Nature , which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us ). Scientific American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers.
The detection represents the first of its kind and is opening new vistas on Einstein’s general theory of relativity
Charlie Wood is a journalist covering discoveries in the physical sciences both on and off the planet.
Charlie Wood is a journalist covering discoveries in the physical sciences both on and off the planet.
Some 870 million years ago two dead stars became one. Their merger shook the fabric of space with a gravitational wave that swept through Earth on August 14, 2019, rippling through three pairs of carefully calibrated lasers designed to detect their passage. An automated system sent out a preliminary alert 21 seconds later, vibrating smartphones and pinging laptops around the world.
A few years after the Nobel Prize–winning first gravitational-wave detection, which stemmed from a pair of colliding black holes, such alerts had become commonplace. This time, however, astrophysicists instantly knew that the observed event was special. “My jaw dropped when I saw the data,” says Geoffrey Lovelace of California State University, Fullerton, a member of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) Scientific Collaboration.
The wave was detected by LIGO in the U.S. and the Virgo Observatory in Italy at 21:11:18 UTC on August 14, 2019. An automatic first pass pegged it as resulting from an unprecedented merger between a pair of bodies too light to classify, sending astronomers scrambling to look for additional electromagnetic emissions from the event. Subsequent analysis recategorized the signal as a collision between a black hole and a neutron star, a stellar remnant in which gravity squeezes an entire sun’s mass into a ball the size of a city. This may be the first such event detected with confidence and, after black hole–black hole mash-ups and mergers between two neutron stars, the third variety of collision detected by gravitational waves. While the classification remains uncertain, this event, now known as GW190814, marks the beginning of a new era of astrophysical studies, with implications for how researchers understand Einstein’s general theory of relativity, the deaths of stars and the behavior of extreme matter.
Chad Hanna, a LIGO collaborator and astrophysicist at Pennsylvania State University, was celebrating his wedding anniversary with his wife when his phone went off. His group specializes in rapid classification of LIGO events, so he immediately logged in to check the wave’s details. “The first thing I knew was that it was extremely significant,” Hanna says, “kind of off-the-charts loud.”
The LIGO-Virgo collaboration’s algorithmic pipeline spits out a basic classification based on the shape of a wave, its duration and other factors almost instantly—Hanna’s team aims for under 20 seconds—so astronomers can immediately slew their telescopes in the celestial direction the wave came from.
On that August day, the automatic system confidently declared that at least one of the objects that produced GW190814 fell into the “mass gap,” a wasteland, spanning three to five solar masses, seemingly bereft of black holes and neutron stars. All known black holes weigh more than five suns, while all known neutron stars—born from lighter stars that stopped short of becoming black holes—weigh less than three suns. A mass gap detection would have been a first for LIGO-Virgo—one that would have sharpened the theoretical line separating the heaviest neutron stars from the lightest black holes—but the preliminary label would not last. “There was a handoff around the globe,” says Jocelyn Read, an astrophysicist at C.S.U. Fullerton and a LIGO member, beginning with researchers in the U.S. that afternoon and with calculations continuing in Europe well into the following morning.
American scientists woke up on August 14, 2019, to a new classification. Human analysis had pegged the event as a neutron star–black hole merger with greater than 99 percent confidence. LIGO-Virgo has heard the collisions of more than a dozen black hole pairs, as well as two pairs of neutron stars, but it has never conclusively heard the rumbles from a black hole swallowing a neutron star.
“This is something I’ve waited for for a long time,” says James Lattimer, an astronomy professor at Stony Brook University and a pioneering nuclear astrophysicist, who showed that neutron star–black hole mergers can spray heavy elements such as gold and uranium into space in his 1976 thesis.
Researchers detected a similar wave in April 2019, but they were not able to confirm that it came from deep space—the signal associated with that potential event, models suggest, has a 60 percent chance of originating from a terrestrial rumble, and such a spurious detection might be expected about once every 20 months. The August 2019 signal, however, initially appeared so clear that a false alarm would have been a once-in-trillions-of-years event. “When it’s more than the age of the universe,” Lovelace says, “you know it’s the real deal.” More comprehensive analyses later pegged a false alarm as a once-in-tens-of-thousands-of-years occurrence.
GW190814’s deafening signal, however, does not guarantee that astrophysicists have definitely bagged their first neutron star–black hole collision. While the current label clearly puts the heavier object in black hole territory (more than five suns), it leaves the lighter partner in the murky zone below three solar masses. Further analysis refined this partner’s weight to 2.6 solar masses, where its identity could still break either way—toward the universe’s heaviest-known neutron star or its lightest-known black hole. Theoretical arguments have led physicists to suspect that a black hole is more likely, but without more data they cannot be sure.
Virgo’s detector in Italy—along with only one of LIGO’s two detectors—recognized the wave initially, but the collaboration was able to manually incorporate data from the second LIGO detector overnight. Triangulating from that third detection allowed researchers to pinpoint the source’s location in the sky more precisely than any previous wave so soon after detection. “I opened up [the new] sky map, and I was like, ‘Oh, they accidentally updated a blank sky map,’” Read recalls thinking before she noticed the tiny dot marking the wave’s origin.
The narrowed location, which amounted to 0.06 percent of the sky’s total area, came as a boon to astronomical teams hunting for a flash of gamma rays or visible light that could accompany the death of a neutron star, if that is what the lighter partner was. “In principle, it’s a manner of minutes to cover that area,” says Marcelle Soares-Santos, a cosmologist at Brandeis University, who coordinated follow-up observations using the Dark Energy Camera on a four-meter telescope in Chile.
The black hole may have shredded the potential neutron star, leaving behind a ring of glittering wreckage that faded as it fell into the hole’s waiting maw. Alternatively the black hole could have swallowed the neutron star in one clean gulp, with little left to see. LIGO-Virgo simulations for GW190814 predict the latter scenario, but no one knows for sure what actually transpired. Soares-Santos and other teams ultimately did not spot an accompanying flash, which she says may help refine theories of how this first-of-its-kind event could have played out.
Theorists dream of catching the demise of a neutron star because competing theories describing the innards of the enigmatic objects abound. Nuclear physicists seek a glimpse inside the objects, where matter exists at densities that challenge the present best models. If the pressure dissolves neutrons into a plasma of fundamental particles, for instance, neutron stars of a certain mass should appear smaller than they otherwise would be. Fine features of the detected gravitational wave produced as the star spiraled into the black hole may reveal the star’s size and, accordingly, the consistency of the matter that fills it. Similarly, whether astronomers see a flash or not will also set limits on the star’s size. Such precise measurements of a neutron star’s dimensions are “sort of the holy grail of nuclear physics,” says Ben Margalit, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, who is not part of the collaboration that observed the event.
A black hole obliterating a neutron star also represents a new arena for testing general relativity. Applying Einstein’s theory of gravity to the smooth fabric of spacetime around black holes is tough enough, Lovelace says. Adding in hot, turbulent magnetized neutron star matter—an exotic substance sometimes called neutronium—elevates the challenge to a messy new level.
Even if this ripple in spacetime doesn’t divulge any of nature’s secrets, researchers feel confident it is just the first of many to come. “I hope it tells us something about black hole–neutron star [mergers],” Lovelace says. “But if not, it still makes me really optimistic that the gravitational sky is bright.”
Davide Castelvecchi and Nature magazine
Sign up for Scientific American ’s free newsletters.
Discover world-changing science. Explore our digital archive back to 1845, including articles by more than 150 Nobel Prize winners.
© 2022 Scientific American, a Division of Springer Nature America, Inc.
Thanks for reading Scientific American. Knowledge awaits.
Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue.
Continue reading with a Scientific American subscription.
Stacy Doll Handjob
Crossdresser Fuck Guy
Bbw Granny Handjob