Beautiful Young Teen Fuck

Beautiful Young Teen Fuck
Sorry, the browser you are using is no longer supported by Shutterstock. Please upgrade your browser to continue.
Beautiful young teenager girl royalty-free images 1,621,735 beautiful young teenager girl stock photos, vectors, and illustrations are available royalty-free. See beautiful young teenager girl stock video clips

Listening on…

Switch Spotify device
Open in Spotify Web Player

Change playback source

Open on YouTube website

Change playback source

Previous

Play

Next

Skip to YouTube video

Toggle navigation Upgrade to Pro Live Music Charts Events Features

Subscribe

Log In

Sign Up

More actions

Set as current obsession

Go to artist profile

Get track

Loading

More actions

Set as current obsession

Go to artist profile

Get track

Loading

Related Tags

Add tags

Similar Artists

Play all

Company

About Last.fm
Contact Us
Jobs

Help

Track My Music

Community Support

Community Guidelines

Help

Goodies

Download Scrobbler
Developer API
Free Music Downloads
Merchandise

Account

Sign Up
Log In
Subscribe

Follow Us

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube

Connect your Spotify account to your Last.fm account and scrobble everything you listen to, from any Spotify app on any device or platform.

A new version of Last.fm is available, to keep everything running smoothly, please reload the site.

Scrobble, find and rediscover music with a Last.fm account

Do you know a YouTube video for this track?

Add a video

Do you know any background info about this track?

Start the wiki

Do you know a YouTube video for this track?

Add a video

We don‘t have an album for this track yet.
We don‘t have an album for this track yet.

Javascript is required to view shouts on this page.

Go directly to shout page

Do you have any photos of this artist?

Add an image

Do you know any background info about this artist?

Start the wiki

Some user-contributed text on this page is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply.

*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘I AM LITERALLY STARVING’: Uber Eats customer says she waited 3 hours for Chick-fil-A to be delivered
‘I am a woman of my word’: Worker threatens to quit on Post-it if she gets scheduled to work weekends by herself. Her workplace does it again
‘The irony is I ended up getting a promotion over that guy’: ‘Quiet quitter’ mocks co-workers who are working hard for promotions, sparking debate
‘I’m always tryna save my tables money’: Server shares hack to getting mimosas cheaper at restaurants, sparking debate

*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘I AM LITERALLY STARVING’: Uber Eats customer says she waited 3 hours for Chick-fil-A to be delivered
‘I am a woman of my word’: Worker threatens to quit on Post-it if she gets scheduled to work weekends by herself. Her workplace does it again
‘The irony is I ended up getting a promotion over that guy’: ‘Quiet quitter’ mocks co-workers who are working hard for promotions, sparking debate
‘I’m always tryna save my tables money’: Server shares hack to getting mimosas cheaper at restaurants, sparking debate

Slut Share Wife
Lesbian Porn Massage 2022
Jpg Lingeries

Beautiful Young Teen Fuck

Report Page