Article: Promotion of Democracy Vs Demonisation of risks
MMJ
UTAMA | Manusia | Komunikasi | Ilmu | Cabaran | Keluar || HOME | People | Communication | Knowledge | Challenges | Exit
What is behind the promotion of democracy and the demonisation of risks?
Democracy is promoted so much because they can exploit a loophole by funding all sides in democracy elections. They did that in the US and the world can see and is suffering and has suffered, the effects of this tragedy now. And first they build up their wealth using riba/usury no loss business model.
Banks deliver the world's riches to them since the early Rothchilds and similar breeds. Getting filthy rich they promote democracy endlessly via the media which they controlled with their riches. The real answer to democracy can actually be a benevolent dictatorship. A Muslim Caliphate is a benevolent dictatorship. Modern examples that come close to a benevolent dictatorship is China and Singapore. But they will continue to demonise anything other than democracy. At the same time they demonise risk to ensure the world stick to the debt/interest model in banking.
Equity in the economy instead of debt will create more jobs for the nation, increase economic output, increased incomes for people, reduce inflation and shrink poverty gap but any thoughts along this line they must kill in the bud before it kills the debt based banking system which has brought untold wealth to them. Risk must be demonised at all costs.
Islam says Alghunm bi Alghurm - rewards come with risk. A Muslim is not entitled to any reward unless he is willing to face risk. But Muslim countries too have also swallowed the spiel hook, line and sinker. There are equity models to shed the fear of risk. But risk must be loudly and endlessly demonised so people would never consider this alternative. Unfortunately they have been successful with this propaganda.
We need to be more questioning with legacy systems we receive from our past. What more if we have a religion that declares the legacy system is in contradiction of Quran and Sunnah. If we are told there is a decision on this and that. We need to know, the rules may be right, but is the understanding of the world that leads to the decision correct?! Were the decision makers presented with the correct understanding of the worldly matters? Who presented the worldly matters to the decision makers?
Note that another demand of the Quran is the constant command to think. Afala tatafakkarun, afala ta'kilun, afala tazakkarun, afala tubsirun wa afala ya tadabbarun. We will be questioned in the hereafter.
Source: Zahid Aziz on X
UTAMA | Manusia | Komunikasi | Ilmu | Cabaran | Keluar || HOME | People | Communication | Knowledge | Challenges | Exit
Dikemaskini [Updated]: Sam Ahmad 20240331