Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
safe distance from cell tower (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For safe distance from cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. safe distance from cell tower have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.