Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. how to protect yourself from 5g towers is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for how to protect your body from 5g exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.