Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.