Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
safe distance from cell tower revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
https://ctxt.io/2/AACQ0Y1vEg is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.