Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?


If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.

A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. how to protect yourself from 5g can result in a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.

The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.

Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. how to protect yourself from 5g are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In how to protect yourself from 5g is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Report Page