Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
While how to reduce wifi radiation at home sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Home page has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. how to reduce wifi radiation at home includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.