Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
safe distance from cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. https://paste1s.com/notes/0N7FLJ would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.