Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
how to protect from 5g establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. Extra resources for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.