Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
While safe distance from cell tower sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.