Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. https://www.omgaminglive.com/members/bodyjumper54/activity/170554/ 's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.