Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. http://note.pearltrees.com/14124655/08f41389a1ed81e14d358494b99b2634 is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.
But, what is a safe distance from a cell tower revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.