Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?


If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.

A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for safe distance to live from cell phone tower that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Report Page