Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
https://te.legra.ph/How-Far-Can-You-Go-From-your-5G-Mobile-Tower-Without-Staying-Unsafe-04-26 ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In https://fnote.me/notes/FrWbH6 , the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.