Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?


If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.

It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.

The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. how to protect from 5g have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. how to protect yourself from emf do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Report Page