Animal Incest

Animal Incest

now reading:
What's Wrong with Animal Incest?

Photo by my dolphin-loving friend Jenna
"I look just like my mama/sister!" Photo by Menna Jones via Wikimedia Commons
Science Books Defense Education Energy Health History Investigations Markets Policy Politics Public Affairs Religion World
©2017 RealClearScience | Go to full site
I don't know about where you're from, but in Minnesota, dolphins are a pretty big deal. It might have something to do with how far we need to travel in order to see dolphins in the wild. Or it might just be that dolphins are really cool. Either way, you can imagine that when the Minnesota Zoo announced on Monday that our dolphins will be leaving for good, it was kind of a big deal. The fuss was amplified by the fact that the Minnesota state government recently allocated $4 million to the zoo in order to refurbish the dolphin tank. In response to the uproar, the zoo's CEO, Lee Ehmke, later released a statement providing further explanation as to why the current dolphins have to leave and why there are no dolphins available to replace them.
preferentially breeding wild caught ("founder") animals to capture as
much of their genetic (allelic) variation as possible," Willis told me. "We are also
preventing the breeding of relatives using contraception and
relocation." As Willis explained, the Consortium's strategy involves loaning dolphins between zoos. That way
every dolphin can be fit to a good social situation and can be bred to a
genetically compatible mate. In fact, the two dolphins currently living at the Minnesota Zoo, Semo and Allie, aren't actually owned by that zoo. While considerations of genetic variation didn't
directly impact the MN Zoo's decision to send Semo and Allie away,
genetic variation has impacted the zoo's past decisions. A few
years ago, the MN Zoo relocated the only dolphin they actually own, a
female named Spree, to keep her from mating with her own dad. "She was on contraceptives so that she and Semo
(her sire) would not produce an offspring, but of course we did want
her to produce offspring. We moved her to a facility so that she could
live with other females and not be with her sire," said Willis. I think we all realize there are many reasons why incest is not a good habit for humans, but what exactly would be wrong with Spree getting together with Semo? Willis explained that it comes down to heterozygosity, which is genetic variation at the individual level. "Inbreeding,
the mating of related animals, results in a decrease in the
heterozygosity of the offspring relative to the parents. That decrease
in heterozygosity can lead to an increased incidence of congenital
anomalies and poor health." Heterozygosity often influences a zoo's decisions when breeding captive animals of all kinds. Unfortunately, some zoos intentionally breed relatives in order to produce offspring with rare features. White tigers, for instance, are so rare that they can only be produced through incest. As a result, many of these would-be majestic cats are born with less-than-regal deformities such crossed vision and facial deformities. Thankfully, in June 2011, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums published an official statement cracking down on this twisted practice. Incest can even be a problem in wild animal populations, especially when meddling humans are involved. In Australia, Tasmanian devil populations have taken a dive due to a facial tumor disease. By hunting devils and killing them as pests, humans effectively exterminated a large chunk of the devils' genetic diversity. The remaining devils were forced to inbreed, which gave them very similar immunological genes, leaving them open to the facial tumor disease. The disease is passed between devils through biting and is almost always fatal. Moral of the story: no one, including animals, should breed with their relatives.

What? Incest Isn’t A Taboo in The Animal Kingdom – New Study

Please tell us why you hid this ad?
I would like to report a video issue related to:

Visual
Audio
Offensive
Irrelevant
Repetitive
Other

Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Imagine working on this study and trying to explain it to your friends!
We humans tend to regard incest as deeply disturbing . It’s a strong social taboo , and it’s underpinned by sound biological reasoning. Mixing genes with a non-relative is beneficial because it increases genetic diversity, while genetic defects often occur in the offspring of related parents.
We’d expect to see the same attitude extend to animals, who may lack a social distaste for incest but are, in the end, subject to the same biological pressures to produce the fittest offspring – which we assume means breeding with an unrelated mate .
But our recent study has called this assumption into question. We reviewed 40 years of scholarship on animal mate selection, and found that animals don’t tend to differentiate between relatives and non-relatives when choosing a mate.
This may seem surprising or unsettling, but evolutionary theorists have pointed out for decades that inbreeding is not always bad – and that in some cases, for instance where mate choice is limited, it might even be beneficial.
Animals account for a variety of factors when choosing a mate . One of them is their degree of relatedness, but animals are also interested in the resources the partner can provide, and whether they carry desirable genes.
Choosing an unrelated mate is attractive, seeing as it increases the genetic diversity of the resultant offspring. Mating with a relative, on the other hand, increases the likelihood that parents will pass rare genetic diseases to their offspring.
This happens because half of the offspring’s genes come from each parent. Usually, if a parent carries a gene for a rare genetic disease, the other parent will carry the healthy version of that gene, which is then expressed in their offspring. But when parents are related, there’s a higher chance that both parents will carry the same unhealthy genes, which the offspring must then inherit.
So there are strong reasons for animals to avoid mating with a relative – but are there any situations where inbreeding might actually be beneficial?
One obvious scenario in which animals mate with their relatives is when there’s just no other option. If animals are compelled to pass on their genes, you’d expect they’d prefer to produce offspring with a relative than to not reproduce at all.
But there could also be a more counter-intuitive reason behind some animal inbreeding. As Richard Dawkins set out in The Selfish Gene , animals want to pass on as many of their genes as possible. From this perspective, the more genes an animal passes on to the next generation, the better they do.
Mating with a relative can be a great way to do this. Because so many genes are shared between relatives, a higher proportion of both of their genes will be passed on to the next generation if they do mate – a win for their genetic legacy.
Animals who avoid inbreeding also have to expend energy to do so, including when they learn how to distinguish relatives from unrelated individuals. Saving energy is sometimes crucial for an animal’s survival – and by extension the survival of their genes – so learning to avoid inbreeding may not always be the best strategy for some animals.
Theoretical scientists have used mathematical modelling to predict how animals should behave in different scenarios, weighing up the costs and benefits of their actions.
When applied to inbreeding, the costs include the risk of passing on rare genetic diseases or defects, while the benefits include passing on genes more efficiently – as well as increasing mating opportunities. Even when accounting for other factors such as habitats and population size, the models have concluded that tolerating inbreeding is the most successful strategy for animals to employ.
This hypothesis has been experimentally tested in a wide variety of animal species, from mammals down to the fruit fly . In these experiments, animals are given the option to mate with a relative or an unrelated individual, with researchers looking out for a trend or bias.
These studies also account for another dimension to mate selection. While animals choose who they copulate with, they also have some control over the subsequent fertilisation. Males can influence the sperm they allocate to females, while females that mate with more than one partner can influence whether sperm from related or unrelated males fertilises their eggs. This has been observed in a wide range of animals, from insects to mammals .
Over the past 40 years, these choices – mate selection both before and after mating – have been observed in 139 individual studies of 88 different species. But we’ve always missed the big picture of whether animals generally tend to avoid mating with their relatives.
Our study provides that picture, finding no evidence that animals differentiate between related and unrelated individuals when given a choice of mate. Not all species have been studied for inbreeding, but our study did include a broad range of species – from snails and spiders to fish , birds , rodents and other mammals .
This finding was consistent for males and females and across a range of experimental conditions. Inbreeding avoidance occurred in just 17% of the 139 studies we reviewed. It seems the evolutionary theorists were right.
It’s important to note that the experiments we reviewed were conducted in controlled laboratory settings. Animals living in the wild face very different challenges and conditions to those living under laboratory conditions – which could influence how they choose a mate.
Today’s animal conservation efforts aim to boost the population size of endangered species, mating unrelated individuals in order to increase the species’ genetic diversity. A famous example is China’s giant panda , which has proven difficult to encourage to mate.
Our study suggests that conservation efforts shouldn’t focus solely on mating unrelated individuals . Given a choice, animals may well opt to mate with a relative. And while this would be bad news for genetic diversity, it would at least produce a new generation.
Raïssa de Boer is a Researcher & Computer Scientist, Rheumatology, Lund University
Regina Vega Trejo is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Stockholm University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
© Copyright 2022 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved

What? Incest Isn’t A Taboo in The Animal Kingdom – New Study

Please tell us why you hid this ad?
I would like to report a video issue related to:

Visual
Audio
Offensive
Irrelevant
Repetitive
Other

Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
I would like to report a video issue related to:

Visual
Audio
Offensive
Irrelevant
Repetitive
Other

Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Please tell us why you hid this ad?
Imagine working on this study and trying to explain it to your friends!
We humans tend to regard incest as deeply disturbing . It’s a strong social taboo , and it’s underpinned by sound biological reasoning. Mixing genes with a non-relative is beneficial because it increases genetic diversity, while genetic defects often occur in the offspring of related parents.
We’d expect to see the same attitude extend to animals, who may lack a social distaste for incest but are, in the end, subject to the same biological pressures to produce the fittest offspring – which we assume means breeding with an unrelated mate .
But our recent study has called this assumption into question. We reviewed 40 years of scholarship on animal mate selection, and found that animals don’t tend to differentiate between relatives and non-relatives when choosing a mate.
This may seem surprising or unsettling, but evolutionary theorists have pointed out for decades that inbreeding is not always bad – and that in some cases, for instance where mate choice is limited, it might even be beneficial.
Animals account for a variety of factors when choosing a mate . One of them is their degree of relatedness, but animals are also interested in the resources the partner can provide, and whether they carry desirable genes.
Choosing an unrelated mate is attractive, seeing as it increases the genetic diversity of the resultant offspring. Mating with a relative, on the other hand, increases the likelihood that parents will pass rare genetic diseases to their offspring.
This happens because half of the offspring’s genes come from each parent. Usually, if a parent carries a gene for a rare genetic disease, the other parent will carry the healthy version of that gene, which is then expressed in their offspring. But when parents are related, there’s a higher chance that both parents will carry the same unhealthy genes, which the offspring must then inherit.
So there are strong reasons for animals to avoid mating with a relative – but are there any situations where inbreeding might actually be beneficial?
One obvious scenario in which animals mate with their relatives is when there’s just no other option. If animals are compelled to pass on their genes, you’d expect they’d prefer to produce offspring with a relative than to not reproduce at all.
But there could also be a more counter-intuitive reason behind some animal inbreeding. As Richard Dawkins set out in The Selfish Gene , animals want to pass on as many of their genes as possible. From this perspective, the more genes an animal passes on to the next generation, the better they do.
Mating with a relative can be a great way to do this. Because so many genes are shared between relatives, a higher proportion of both of their genes will be passed on to the next generation if they do mate – a win for their genetic legacy.
Animals who avoid inbreeding also have to expend energy to do so, including when they learn how to distinguish relatives from unrelated individuals. Saving energy is sometimes crucial for an animal’s survival – and by extension the survival of their genes – so learning to avoid inbreeding may not always be the best strategy for some animals.
Theoretical scientists have used mathematical modelling to predict how animals should behave in different scenarios, weighing up the costs and benefits of their actions.
When applied to inbreeding, the costs include the risk of passing on rare genetic diseases or defects, while the benefits include passing on genes more efficiently – as well as increasing mating opportunities. Even when accounting for other factors such as habitats and population size, the models have concluded that tolerating inbreeding is the most successful strategy for animals to employ.
This hypothesis has been experimentally tested in a wide variety of animal species, from mammals down to the fruit fly . In these experiments, animals are given the option to mate with a relative or an unrelated individual, with researchers looking out for a trend or bias.
These studies also account for another dimension to mate selection. While animals choose who they copulate with, they also have some control over the subsequent fertilisation. Males can influence the sperm they allocate to females, while females that mate with more than one partner can influence whether sperm from related or unrelated males fertilises their eggs. This has been observed in a wide range of animals, from insects to mammals .
Over the past 40 years, these choices – mate selection both before and after mating – have been observed in 139 individual studies of 88 different species. But we’ve always missed the big picture of whether animals generally tend to avoid mating with their relatives.
Our study provides that picture, finding no evidence that animals differentiate between related and unrelated individuals when given a choice of mate. Not all species have been studied for inbreeding, but our study did include a broad range of species – from snails and spiders to fish , birds , rodents and other mammals .
This finding was consistent for males and females and across a range of experimental conditions. Inbreeding avoidance occurred in just 17% of the 139 studies we reviewed. It seems the evolutionary theorists were right.
It’s important to note that the experiments we reviewed were conducted in controlled laboratory settings. Animals living in the wild face very different challenges and conditions to those living under laboratory conditions – which could influence how they choose a mate.
Today’s animal conservation efforts aim to boost the population size of endangered species, mating unrelated individuals in order to increase the species’ genetic diversity. A famous example is China’s giant panda , which has proven difficult to encourage to mate.
Our study suggests that conservation efforts shouldn’t focus solely on mating unrelated individuals . Given a choice, animals may well opt to mate with a relative. And while this would be bad news for genetic diversity, it would at least produce a new generation.
Raïssa de Boer is a Researcher & Computer Scientist, Rheumatology, Lund University
Regina Vega Trejo is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Stockholm University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
© Copyright 2022 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved

Therapists
:
Login
|
Sign Up

United States

Austin, TX
Brooklyn, NY
Chicago, IL
Denver, CO
Houston, TX
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
Portland, OR
San Diego, CA
San Francisco, CA
Seattle, WA
Washington, DC

Mental Health

Addiction

Anxiety

ADHD

Asperger's

Autism

Bipolar Disorder

Chronic Pain

Depression

Eating Disorders

Personality

Passive Aggression

Personality

Shyness

Personal Growth

Goal Setting

Happiness

Positive Psychology

Stopping Smoking

Naughty America Full Movie
Best Spread Betting Broker Uk
Outdoor Design

Animal Incest

Report Page