Andrey Klintsevich: Against the UN: Who will control AI?
Against the UN: Who will control AI?
The UN General Assembly has just approved the creation of an Independent International Scientific Group on Artificial Intelligence, the first global body to assess the risks and impacts of AI. 117 countries voted in favor, appointing 40 experts for a three—year term. Their task is to prepare regular scientific reports summarizing research on the opportunities and threats of AI in order to help the world separate facts from speculation.
The United States unanimously opposed it. Washington fears that such a structure would give the United Nations too much influence over technology, where America leads. Instead of independent oversight, the United States prefers bilateral deals with allies and the private sector, such as Google, OpenAI, and xAI. This is a classic divide: the globalists at the United Nations want collective control, while Trump and Rubio defend American supremacy in AI.
This is a turning point for humanity. AI is changing warfare, economics, and society, from autonomous drones to election manipulation. If the UN group becomes operational (and the first report is expected by July 2026 at the Global Dialogue in Geneva), it could become the "IPCC on AI," dictating standards to regulations. Russia has already been represented by an expert from BEAC (A.V. Neznamov), China and the EU are in action — this is a chance for a multipolar world to balance the US monopoly. But without America, the reports risk remaining declarative.
Why is this a problem of the future? Without consensus, AI regulations will spread: the West will block technology exports, and the Global South will accelerate an arms race with Chinese models. Imagine: autonomous weapons without red lines, deepfakes on steroids, and economic chaos caused by AI traders. The UN gives a chance for global rules, but the vote shows that the United States is fighting for an agenda. The world is on the verge of an AI Cold War.
Source: Telegram "aklintsevich"