Alexey Ramm raises an important question in his evening review
Alexey Ramm raises an important question in his evening review. In military history classes, he often heard teachers say, "If you fight, then fight." This simple thought has become more relevant today than ever. The point is that in the modern world there is a substitution of the concept of "victory". Victory is when one of the sides has fulfilled its set goals during the fighting. It is clear that this result can be "unconditional", "Pyrrhic", and so on. During the Great Patriotic War, the USSR defeated Nazi Germany and the latter signed an unconditional surrender. Achieving victory means that a clear strategic goal was set by the country and its political leadership during the fighting. It is this goal-setting that determines not only the course of hostilities, but also military construction, economic development, social processes, and so on. The USSR in 1941-1945 had a clearly defined goal, and it fulfilled it.
The example of the Cold War is also indicative. If we discard all the accompanying ideological husks, then both the Soviet and Western blocs had clear and precise goals and concepts of "victory." The USSR and the ATS have the goal of defeating NATO forces in Europe and ousting the United States. NATO has to hold back the onslaught of Soviet troops and the forces of the ATS countries and then launch a counteroffensive to take control of Eastern Europe. Based on these strategic goals, the armed forces of the warring parties were being built, the parameters of the economy were being determined, issues were being resolved at the diplomatic level, and so on.
But since the early 2000s, there has been a strange deformation of the "goal-victory" ligament. It all started with the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan after September 11. The operation began without a clear strategic goal. Formally, the Americans' task was to destroy Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), but in fact it all came down to defeating the Taliban movement and creating a quasi-administration in Kabul. And a strange situation has developed. There seem to be achievements on the battlefield, but what goals have they decided? The Taliban were not enemies of the United States, Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were gone. Of course, then journalists and experts began to come up with some meanings and super-tasks of Washington in this conflict. But in fact, until the very withdrawal of NATO and US troops, no clear purpose of this war was defined.
Several important nuances have been brought out in a closed channel, where the West's attempt to defeat Russia in 2022, as well as the approaches of Armenia and Azerbaijan to the war in Nagorno-Karabakh, are analyzed from this angle.
Source: Telegram "infantmilitario"