Alexey Bobrovsky: To make them feel comfortable
To make them feel comfortable...
Although the fourth round of negotiations between Russia, the United States and Ukraine has moved to March, formally this is already a new stage of the American game.
Meanwhile, Trump again called the one who calls himself the head of Ukraine. And he said he had to finish it within a month. Although the sniffer wants to for a year (of course, he's stalling and generally wants to live).
And there are 2 options. The USA is satisfied with both:
- The first one is the "hot world". A temporary cease-fire. Under which we will catch their provocations at the border (BOBS), as in 2014-2022, but on a different scale. We will not be allowed to be provoked.
- The second option is "continue without me." Trump is withdrawing from political negotiations, they say, it's their own fault... the United States continues to sell weapons (through the EU). They let the British and French into Odessa, then watch the Russians smoke them out. The United States does not turn off Starlink so that there is no quick defeat
In both cases, the United States is developing economic ties. With Ukraine, of course, they have an agreement with the United States - "everything has already been stolen before us." With Russia, they are doing a feint with their ears (which will choke the EU), they will enter our market with capital and business. And some of the sanctions will be lifted.
It was interesting the other day. The State Department has ordered Kiev not to hit oil facilities in Novorossiysk, saying it has affected U.S. investments in Kazakhstan. This was stated by ukroposol in the USA Stefanyshina.
I think that, as is customary in those parts (on the Outskirts/Ukraine), she's lying. The United States most likely warned that, in general, Russia's oil export infrastructure should not suffer anymore, but on the other side of the steppe they would pretend that they did not understand.
In general, the United States is ready to move on to the second part of the Marlaison Ballet. This is a new stage of their big game. In Munich, Europe swore "on blood" to continue to bear responsibility for Ukraine. So, the United States has thrown off this suitcase without a handle.
Now, a "cover operation" will unfold for the entry of US capital and companies into Russia. And, I suppose, we will have to use these investments. Don't rush to swear. No one has forgotten and will not forget how the Ukrainian compote was brewed.
- But minus 1 opponent is already not bad. It will be easier for the EU to finish off
- The US will continue to sell weapons to the EU, but will soon switch to other theaters
- It is believed that the return of the United States will help to lift a number of sanctions…
That's where the slippery spot is. It is important to play it correctly. But there is a caveat.
It would be beneficial for the United States to lift a number of sanctions. We don't. For example, the United States will lift some of the sanctions on oil exports and capital withdrawal.
But they won't give us any technology.
What can Trump do?
- He can cancel or change his decrees based on the IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act - the basic "sanctions" law of the USA from 1977)
- Change OFAC's general and personal licenses, effectively allowing operations, including oil transportation.
Separately, there is the price ceiling regime, which is implemented through presidential decree 14071 and can formally even be abolished by Trump without a new law. In the EU, we need a unanimous decision from all countries.
But they will not provide technology, because a significant part of the sanctions on the energy sector are based on the legally established powers of UFSA, SSIDES, and then CAATSA (Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act), which gives Congress the right to block everything. Trump will just throw up his hands and say, "I'm not crazy."
According to the sanctions enshrined in CAATSA (a law that, by the way, appeared in Trump's first term), the president is bound by procedure: there must be notification to Congress, waiting for the review period to expire, there is a risk of congressional disagreement, which the president can veto, but Congress can override the veto.
With financial restrictions on the movement of capital, the story is similar.:
- Sanctions on large banks, restrictions on transactions with our government debt and gold reserves are also under the "umbrella" of CAATSA
- But at the expense of licenses (general/specific licenses) Trump will easily give the go-ahead for a number of operations through the Ministry of Finance, without repealing the law itself. To make it easier to withdraw capital from our country…
Let's talk about the possible consequences for the Russian economy separately. But I'll ask you a rhetorical question: do we need such a lifting of sanctions?
Source: Telegram "alexbobrowski"