Aaron Judge Was Asked Whether He’d Sign With Red Sox
Aaron JudgeAaron Judge is having a season for the ages. On Tuesday night, he continued his torrid Yankees campaign at Fenway Park against the rival Red Sox, blasting home runs 56 and 57 on the season in a 7–6 win.
The homers put him just four shy of Roger Maris for the franchise single-season record, and the mark that many consider the true milestone, given the steroid concerns that loom over Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa—the only three players to hit more than Maris’s 61 home runs in a season.
In most situations, Judge’s season would make him a locked-in franchise cornerstone, a player with no questions about their future with baseball’s most historic franchise. However, Judge will hit unrestricted free agency in the offseason after avoiding arbitration earlier this year with a one-year, $19 million deal. A few months before he could conceivably walk away from New York after one of the greatest seasons in Yankees history, one reporter had to ask: would Judge ever play for the Red Sox?
“Ooh,” Judge said, eliciting a laugh from the encircled reporters. “We’ll talk about that at the end of the year.”
Get your seats to Red Sox vs. Yankees games with SI Tickets
The non-answer came after Judge remarked about how much he enjoyed playing in front of Red Sox fans in Boston.
“It’s the best, they’re some of the best in baseball. They’re going to boo you, they’re going to say some things, they’re going to make you laugh,” Judge said. “It’s all part of it. A lot of great history here, and this is one of the best places to play, so it’s always fun going out there and trying to put on a show for them.”
Judge continues his pursuit of history at 7:10 p.m. ET Wednesday at Fenway Park.
More MLB Coverage:
Aaron Judge Inches Closer to History With Homers 56, 57
Dodgers Clinch NL West Crown With Win Over Diamondbacks
National League MVP, Cy Young, Rookie of the Year Odds
Inside The Pinstripes: Yankees’ Path to Division Title Has Entered Focus
For more New York Yankees coverage, go to Inside The Pinstripes.
4 takeaways as Yankees beat Red Sox, Aaron Judge reaches 57 homers
The Red Sox rallied but couldn't beat the Yankees in a 10-inning game full of homers.
The Red Sox kept pace with the Yankees in a slugfest for nine innings on Tuesday, but fell 7-6 in the 10th.
Here’s what happened.
The Big Picture
After a scoreless first inning, Triston Casas got the Red Sox on the board with a two-run homer over the Green Monster — the second homer and third hit of his MLB career to date. The Yankees, however, tied the game in the next frame when former Red Sox utility player Marwin Gonzalez ripped a two-run homer of his own.
https://vk.com/@638204390-table-for-six-2022-hd
http://pastie.org/p/1QtwhEDznigpOZ4Dn9V57V
https://vk.com/@638201397-table-for-six-hd
http://pastebin.falz.net/2413865
https://vk.com/@638206314-table-for-six-2022-hk
https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/24cf9e56-4b5e-43ce-a221-5f8edb8c32de
https://vk.com/@638876763-2022-tw
https://dev.bukkit.org/paste/f1fbc75f
https://paiza.io/projects/LioQpisV2tz3vtuJdYj6BQ?language=php
https://vk.com/@prabayar-table-for-six-tw-2022
https://pastelink.net/o202j9oy
https://vk.com/@639065210-2022-hd1080p
https://paste.artemix.org/-/VXNt-d
https://backlinktool.io/p/4VJXitbKv6A0Vgy8d9NS.html
https://vk.com/@trendingmovies-tw2022
https://vk.com/@xyx93-table-for-six-2022-hd
https://paste.cutelyst.org/4mQbGOCMT
https://paste.toolforge.org/view/bd362c5a#nVzKpZ2ayDtpi7KTDMQ27Tvj2AAjdlkn
https://vk.com/@xmovies95-table-for-six-twhk
https://muckrack.com/aaron-judge-2/bio
https://vk.com/@gtre95-table-for-six-2022-hd1080p
https://pasteio.com/xXPPnZX4wgDm
http://ben-kiki.org/ypaste/data/58100/index.html
https://ticketbud.com/events/72cede9a-3445-11ed-89e2-42010a71701e
https://ticketbud.com/events/120be376-3447-11ed-8f0a-42010a71701e
https://mymediads.com/articles/151012?new_advert=true
https://ticketbud.com/events/8b6366f4-3447-11ed-abd7-42010a71701e
https://jsfiddle.net/adikate954/Luqnm7o8/
Reese McGuire hit his first homer of the season in the third to give the Red Sox a 3-2 lead that held until the sixth, when Aaron Judge lined his 56th of the season over the right-field wall. Xander Bogaerts continued his recent hot streak with a 332-foot liner that found its way around the Pesky Pole in the bottom of the sixth, but Judge hit number 57 in the eighth to tie the game back up.
In the 10th, however, the Yankees scored three runs on a bases-clearing double by Gleyber Torres. The Red Sox scored twice in their half when Alex Verdúgo drove in Kiké Hernandez with a single and Connor Wong scored on a wild pitch, but Rafael Devers struck out, stranding Verdugo — the potential tying run — on second.
Star of the Game
Aaron Judge — 3-for-4, three RBIs, three runs, two homers, walk
It sure looked like a few — not all, but a few — Red Sox fans could be seen cheering in the stands when Judge ripped his second homer of the game to left.
The Red Sox denied Judge a shot at 58 by intentionally walking him in the 10th, much to the consternation of people cheering for Judge to pass Roger Maris’s 61-homer mark.
Meanwhile, Judge’s intentional walk in the 10th proved important — he scored the Yankees’ seventh and final run, which staved off the Red Sox’s come back in the bottom of the inning.
Takeaways
1. As a microcosm of a disappointing year, Tuesday’s disappointing ending felt oddly appropriate. A mid-September game featuring baseball’s biggest rivalry had lackluster energy but managed to build some interest in the 10th when it looked like the Red Sox might actually rally from three runs down. Hernandez scored. Wong scored. Verdugo moved into scoring position. Fans rose to their feet for Devers’s final at-bat with runners on first and third.
Then Devers struck out by foul-tipping a ball into the catcher’s mitt — “Sweet Caroline,” but interrupted by sad trombones.
2. Since the start of September, Bogaerts has exploded — .436/.498/.667 in 10 games with a pair of homers and seven RBIs.
Bogaerts — who can opt out of his contract this offseason — said the next couple of weeks might be emotional as “it’s coming down to the finish line” in an appearance on WEEI on Sunday.
On Tuesday, however, Cora reiterated that he would love to have Bogaerts on the team long-term.
“The way I feel about him and the way the organization feels about him is that we want him here, we want him to be his shortstop and want him to be hitting third for a long, long time,” Cora told reporters on Tuesday.
3. NESN cameras captured a nice moment in the dugout — 42-year-old Rich Hill showing 23-year-old Brayan Bello how he throws a curveball.
For the record, Hill throws more curveballs than any other pitch. Bello did not attempt one this season.
4. Matt Barnes pitched a 1-2-3 ninth to send the game into extras — another in a series of encouraging innings. In his last 15 appearances, Barnes has an ERA of 2.70 with 16 strikeouts and six walks.
Jeurys Familia, however, had another disastrous outing, even though he looked like he might get out of the 10th inning unscathed when he coaxed a double play. After intentionally walking Judge, however, he gave up the three-run double to Torres which proved to be the difference.
In his last 10.1 innings pitched, Familia has an ERA of 6.10. He told reporters after the game that he had been designated for assignment. His time with the Red Sox was a reasonable idea, but a resoundingly negative result.
Per MassLive’s Chris Cotillo, Familia will be replaced by Yu Chang.
No, Aaron Judge won't be baseball's 'real' home run king if he gets to 62 this season
Judge might set a new AL record, but he won't get to Barry Bonds' mark of 73
Back in 2017, Giancarlo Stanton, then with the Marlins, made a run at 60 home runs. He finished with 59. It was incredibly fun. Well, the on-field stuff was fun. Listening to a bunch of people attempt to re-litigate history was a bit burdensome, relatively speaking. I bring this up now because it's happening again. Stanton's current Yankees teammate, Aaron Judge, has 57 home runs with three weeks remaining in the season.
Again, it's incredibly fun. And, again, there's a swell of "real home run record" talk, and pointing out that the other single-season leaders reached their heights during baseball's "steroid era." It's louder this time around, since Judge plays in New York and that's just the way things go.
So it seems like we need to have a talk. Again. Back on Aug. 25, 2017, we had a talk about this. I'm a bit more mellow now as I've aged, so I won't be quite as mean, but I'll lay out essentially the same argument that I did then.
The real single-season home run record is 73. Barry Bonds hit 73 home runs in 2001. Mark McGwire hit 70 in 1998. Sammy Sosa hit 66 in 1998. McGwire hit 65 in 1999, while Sosa hit 63. Sosa also hit 64 in 2001.
Those things all happened. They are in the record books. Every single time we here at CBS Sports mention the reality that these things all happened, a litany of fans on social media complain that we listed them. Apparently, I'm supposed to just arbitrarily decide which numbers count and exclude the ones that shouldn't? It's flattering that these people think I have that sort of power. Alas, I do not. The numbers are the numbers and they happened. They are reality.
Back in 2017, I presented the following, admittedly abrasive argument:
Yeah, that's kind of mean (I told you!). It's also 100 percent true.
There's a movement that if Judge hits his 62nd home run this season, it'll be the "real" home run record. It's just not true. The real record is 73. You might wish it didn't happen, but it did.
This is about the time someone replies with a needle emoji or something -- which, I might add, is impressively creative and original and everyone who does it should be so proud of themselves -- so, in fairness to those people, we'll discuss the situation.
Let's talk about context.
There's always context behind numbers.
During the so-called "steroid" or "PED" era in Major League Baseball, offensive numbers exploded. Several factors contributed to said explosion, but the one that sticks out the most for so many people is that Major League Baseball wasn't testing for performance-enhancing drugs and a good number of players were pumping themselves up with them. The league has been testing since 2005, so everyone now, in theory, is to be considered "clean."
These facts colliding with the fact that all six of the individual seasons with more than 61 home runs happened in 1998, 1999 and 2001 clear the way for the PEDs as an easy scapegoat. Here's what I said in 2017:
You think (or claim to know) Barry Bonds juiced. OK. The league wasn't testing for anything and many others were juicing, too. This isn't to justify it from a moral standpoint or anything, it just is what it is. There wasn't a testing program in place and we don't know who was doing what. We do know that Barry Bonds hit 73 home runs in 2001. That's a fact.
https://ticketbud.com/events/f9706228-3447-11ed-9048-42010a71701e
https://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/c6137c4b308b7382
https://ticketbud.com/events/623af5e8-3448-11ed-a08a-42010a71701e
https://ticketbud.com/events/c51b7476-3448-11ed-934d-42010a71701e
https://ticketbud.com/events/2a091974-3449-11ed-8e5e-42010a71701e
https://ticketbud.com/events/7dcbd65a-3449-11ed-ab47-42010a71701e
https://ticketbud.com/events/eecf50a2-3449-11ed-92a8-42010a71701e
https://ticketbud.com/events/554475d8-344a-11ed-97e0-42010a71701e
https://txt.fyi/-/22256/f67c8d87/
https://www.pastery.net/umhzxk/
https://vk.com/@639646543-wolf-pack-2022-hd
https://vk.com/@rere2022-wolf-pack-hd
https://yamcode.com/w3xpat2ybp
https://dotnetfiddle.net/tQbpe7
https://vk.com/@movie98-wolf-pack-2022-hk
https://vk.com/@hvc97-wolf-pack2022-tw
https://vk.com/@redres96-wolf-pack-2022
https://vk.com/@cinemark95-2022-4k-hd1080p
https://vk.com/@stmovi-wolf-pack-2022
https://vk.com/@675895050-2022-4k-hd1080p
https://onlinegdb.com/XcunIvJ4OH
https://tech.io/snippet/LWc6hsu
https://vk.com/@675895411-2022hd-4k
https://vk.com/@webmovi-wolf-pack-20221080p
It was a bad era for baseball in the long run (but great for baseball in the short run, by the way) in the minds of many, but it happened. You don't get to just erase the history books.
If you wanted to get into erasing history, we'd have to keep going.
In 1961, Roger Maris hit 61 home runs. It was an expansion year, so the product was more watered down than in previous seasons. Also, the AL schedule expanded to 162 games (the NL stayed at 154 until 1962). With that context, do we need to ding Maris a bit? All the stars aligned pretty well for his career year to get him to exactly 61 home runs. Rather convenient, no?
If we did penalize Maris, even slightly, it's onto Babe Ruth and his 60 homers in 1927. Only the league wasn't integrated yet. Can we really say the "real" home run record came in a league that didn't allow players of color?
If we're gonna start throwing asterisks on numbers, every single 60-homer season in history has one.
Look, I understand that there are many people offended by the "steroid era" and want the players to be clean. That's perfectly fair. I'm pretty offended by the league not allowing players based upon skin color when Ruth played, but there's really nothing we can do about right now in terms of the numbers he put up. They happened.
So did the "PED"-era numbers.
Circumstances evolve over time. As I said in 2017, "there are things that skew numbers. In baseball, some of those circumstances are integration, expansion, ballpark dimensions changing, the ball being wound more tightly or less tightly, the pitcher's mound height changing, the advent of the designated hitter, reliever specialization and a laundry list of other changes."
With those things, stats are going to change over the course of generations. We're never going to see a pitcher win 511 games again, so Cy Young has the all-time wins record. Did you know Cy Young also has the record with 749 complete games? Even the best pitchers nowadays won't get to 75 career complete games. That's still the record. We shouldn't just start erasing the history of complete games in order for Clayton Kershaw to have a shot at the new "record."
Now, I understand there's a difference in the minds of the people who would say the "real home run record" is 61. They would argue that the "PED" era stained baseball and the numbers should be wiped from the record books. Again, I'd point out racist segregation was a worse stain on baseball, but I'll just stick with the current line of thinking. Someone last time around likened the hopeful erasure of "PED" era numbers to how college sports vacate titles or awards in the face of scandals.
First off, I always find vacating amusing. I mean, just to focus on one team, I watched USC win the national title in 2004 college football. Reggie Bush won the Heisman Trophy the next year. I saw him holding the trophy and everything. It happened. I'm certain of it! Vacating these things doesn't negate what our eyes told us at the time. It doesn't erase the experiences of those involved. It all happened.
Anyway, MLB hasn't even done this with any "steroid era" numbers. So if this is your argument, it's pretty weak. You can argue MLB should vacate the numbers, I suppose, but it hasn't. Even if the league did, such an action wouldn't change the experiences we had in those years and it's an awfully slippery slope to vacate numbers in this fashion, especially since -- to reiterate -- the league wasn't even conducting any testing.
We hold the intellectual capacity to note context in situations in so many different walks of life. We can apply that to Judge's chase of 60-plus home runs. First of all, 61 is still the AL record, so there's that. Judge can set the American League record for home runs. If you're one of the people who really hates the numbers from the 1998-2001 seasons, by all means, believe that Judge has the "clean" record, should he get to 62. It's your right.
What you don't get to do is proclaim what is "real" and what isn't. Barry Bonds hit 73 home runs in 2001. That's the single-season home run record. You don't have to like it, and maybe it hurts your feelings, but it's a fact. It happened.