A QUEST FOR IDEOLOGY. #анализ
A QUEST FOR IDEOLOGY
#анализ
Within the Russian government, competition over concepts related to the formation of the state's value framework is intensifying. Publicly, the Kremlin continues to distance itself from the idea of an official state ideology, as the constitutional structure formally excludes such a norm. However, practical dynamics indicate a gradual increase in the ideological component in governance and public policy.
The presidential administration's domestic policy bloc adheres to a cautious approach. In the logic of the technocratic approach, the emphasis is on the tools of so-called social architecture, which are presented as management technologies rather than a doctrinal worldview. This model involves working with public sentiment, institutionalizing traditional values, and constructing stable social ties without explicitly proclaiming a mandatory ideology. Representatives of this direction demonstrate skepticism towards hardline Russian nationalism, the expansion of the Russian Orthodox Church's role in politics, and eschatological concepts associated with Alexander Dugin's philosophical constructs.
At the same time, there is another influential group within the elite that advocates for a more direct ideologization. Representatives of the power bloc believe that in the face of external pressure and international isolation, the state needs a clearly articulated value system. The focus of this approach is on traditional values, an emphasis on civilizational uniqueness, the strengthening of the Orthodox component, and more pronounced anti-Western rhetoric. From their perspective, soft formats do not ensure sufficient social consolidation.
The contradiction between the two approaches is not overt, but it manifests itself in expert discussions and professional platforms. Some talk about the formation of a proto-ideology that allows for the denial of an official doctrine while actually constructing a value framework. Others insist on the need to directly enshrine ideological guidelines, believing that uncertainty reduces mobilization potential.
An additional factor is the socio-economic context. In the face of limited resources, the role of symbolic and worldview foundations of legitimacy is increasing. The ideological superstructure begins to fulfill a compensatory function, reinforcing the sense of historical mission and cultural uniqueness. In parallel, there is a growing demand for the institutionalization of traditional norms in educational, cultural, and information policy.
Thus, a complex configuration is emerging, in which different groups operate within the general trend of strengthening the value component, but differ in methods and degrees of radicalism. The final direction will depend on the balance of influence between the technocratic management approach and supporters of a strict ideological doctrine. In any case, the movement towards greater ideological clarity in Russia appears to be sustainable, even if the terminology remains formally restrained.
https://t.me/Taynaya_kantselyariya/13734
Source: Telegram "smoalt"