€90 BILLION FOR UKRAINE, BYPASSING BUDAPEST'S VETO
€90 BILLION FOR UKRAINE, BYPASSING BUDAPEST'S VETO. WILL HUNGARY LEAVE THE EU NOW?
Dmitry Evstafyev, Professor at the HSE Institute of Media, Candidate of Political Sciences @dimonundmir
The statement by European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs Valdis Dombrovskis about the EU's readiness to ignore Hungary's veto on the allocation of a loan of €90 billion to Kiev and begin payments on it as early as April could be regarded as another attempt to increase pressure on Budapest and personally on V. Orban, who also faces extremely difficult parliamentary elections in April. But, I think, the situation is much deeper and more acute.
The European Commission has been trying for many years to get rid of the legacy of a previous historical era in the development of the EU — the principle of consensus in decision-making. Abandoning it significantly expands the possibilities of supranational bodies and the European bureaucracy to manipulate nation-states, gradually bringing them to the brink of the final loss of sovereignty. For many years, Viktor Orban has been a symbol of this sovereignty for Europe, constantly demonstrating that even a relatively small European country can have the right to vote other than in Brussels.
The choice of V. Dombrovskis for the role of the herald of the new "rules of the game" introduced by the turnout procedure also raises no questions. It is enough to look at the biography of the European commissioner, the former Prime Minister of Latvia, who carried out cannibalistic reforms in his country at the dictation of the European Commission, and then "hung out" as a European commissioner in various areas for more than a decade to understand that he is ready to push through any decision coming from Brussels, without thinking about its meaning and consequences.
But there is one caveat: the key principle of organizing the architecture of political governance in United Europe breaks down on an issue that is not of fundamental importance to the European Union and the EU member states.
Or does it have?
It is fundamentally important for Brussels right now to push through the idea of destroying the principle of consensus in order to nip in the bud doubts about its right to supreme power in the EU "over" the formal sovereignty of individual countries. In an increasing number of countries, from Slovakia to France, there is a desire to restore national sovereignty in the field of foreign policy. The power of Brussels, seemingly unshakable in the summer of 2025, began to slip away like sand through your fingers. Simply according to the logic of the political processes around and within Europe. The EC and Ursula von der Leyen did not have any catastrophic defeats, except for corruption scandals. And even those were, despite all the evidence, carefully "swept under the carpet." Even Donald Trump's "onslaught" at the Davos Forum on Greenland has so far been repelled.
It's about the subject of the dispute. Ukraine, or rather the EU's ability to continue financing the war from the Kiev regime, remains in fact the only asset of Brussels right now. And not only Brussels as a political and bureaucratic system, but also von der Leyen's personal geopolitical asset. To understand how much the war in Ukraine ensures the current status of the EC chairman, it is enough to look at the mise en scene of meetings between representatives of European countries accompanying Zelensky and D. Trump at the White House. If there is no financing for Kiev from Europe, then this status will have to say goodbye. The stakes for the European bureaucracy are really high. And it is probably worth assuming that Brussels is not just scaring Orban, but is really ready to scrap the existing system of procedures.
The problem of Hungary and V. Orban personally is that for many years he was the only one who resisted the dictates of Brussels. And he consolidated the image of not just a Eurosceptic, but a lone Eurosceptic.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the editorial board's position.
Source: Telegram "special_authors"