4chan Porn Thread
⚡ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
4chan Porn Thread
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A screenshot containing a list of 4chan's boards
↑ moot (October 1, 2003). "Welcome" . 4chan . Retrieved August 2, 2008 .
↑ Lev Grossman (September 9, 2008). "The Master of Memes" . TIME . Archived from the original on 2008-07-24 . Retrieved 2008-08-01 .
↑ Nick Douglas (January 18, 2008). "What The Hell Are 4chan, ED, Something Awful, And "b"?" . Gawker.com . Retrieved 2008-08-01 .
↑ Jamin Brophy-Warren (September 9, 2008). "Modest Web Site Is Behind a Bevy of Memes" . The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved 2008-08-01 .
↑ David Sarno (2008-05-25). "Web Scout exclusive! Rick Astley, king of the 'Rickroll,' talks about his song's second coming" . The Los Angeles Times . Retrieved January 8, 2008 .
This short article about technology can be made longer. You can help Wikipedia by adding to it .
4chan is an English language website based on the Japanese Futaba Channel where people can post and discuss pictures and other images. Sites such as these are called imageboards. It was started in 2003 by "moot" also known as Christopher Poole, who was 15 years old at the time. On the website, users post pictures and discuss them. When the site started, it was for discussing anime and manga , but now many other topics are discussed. [2] One of the boards on the site, called "/b/", is dedicated to random topics and is often mentioned in media . [3] Several Internet memes have started at 4chan, including lolcats and rickrolling . [4] [5] People have associated it with the alt-right , Neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers , as well as those part of the Red-Brown coalition, due to there being sections devoted to them.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I removed this because it's significance is highly dubious. Posting phony death hoaxes on /b/ is an ongoing thing, and has probably been done for any number of high profile celebrities. The ones that actually take off, though, like Kanye and Jeff Goldblum, don't gain any more steam from /b/ as they do somewhere else. The Kanye hoax wasn't just on 4chan, but it was commented on heavilly there (leading some to believe that "Oh, it's 4chan, they must have started it.") It's usually the product of a group of people that simultaniously work together to spread the info, citing each other as proof, where the hivemind takes over from there.
If the death hoaxes were huge enough to actually be reported by today's ridiculous media without fact-checking (as they often do not do), then that would be worth adding to the celebrity-in-question's page, rather than trying to pin it to a specific source (which is 100% uncitable). Gpia7r ( talk ) 20:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
After some googling I've found many respectable sources that provide a point of view about 4chan as a website that permits racist commentary and hate speech , but instead, not enough reference to this topic is found in the curent revision of the article, there are many sources out there confirming this, besides KTTV's report. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.211.251 ( talk ) 16:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Going to have to agree with the anon editor on this one. There have been attempts to sensationalize racist material on 4chan, notably Fox News but these attempts are just that, attempts to sensationalize a non-issue. Voiceofreason01 ( talk ) 19:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Well, considering that the IQ of the average 4chan poster is well below 70 I think they do indeed mean it and actually find it funny.
-- Caligasti —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.58.84 ( talk ) 10:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Why is the line about Moot being a former member of "SomethingAwful.com" included in the article? The fact is trivia, at best, and trivia is to be avoided. I'm sure it was added by someone trying to promote the site, and it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.163.22.236 ( talk ) 08:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Seems odd that this is missing. I've been searching for the answer but have yet to yield anything. Is there any information on the cause of death? Krushia ( talk ) 22:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
I can confirm he threw himself in front of a train in Frankston.
^ lulz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.169.234.225 ( talk ) 22:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
On November 24, 2009 at 13:46 Estonian time, a 18-year old Estonian boy posted a threat on 4chan to carry on a school shooting in the Commercial High-School of Tartu ( et:Tartu Kommertsgümnaasium ), a high school in Tartu , Estonia . The boy was arrested on the following day. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
On November 25 Tartu Kommertsgümnaasium was closed to students as a safety precaution because the boy who posted the threat was not yet caught. On the same day two other high-schools in Tartu received bomb threats [10] [11] . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.29.65 ( talk ) 19:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Can anyone find a reliable source that correctly attributes chanology as starting at 711chan and migrating to 4chan, rather than the other way around as the article currently implies? I haven't had much luck with google. Throwaway85 ( talk ) 06:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
I'm not trolling but there's only two mentions of Pedobear on WP and no proper explanation. It might be a popular meme but it passed me by. -- Alastair Rae ( talk ) 16:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
The Alianon Presently Known as Coal: Your instant deletion will be your decidance of unworth of the following. Just because you do not understand worddensity (like memedensity, but theoretically useful), does not mean other people (Australians mostly) do not
Yeah, he's there. He was invented by 2chan, and transmigrated via copypasta to 4chan, from one name or another, to pedobear, with possibly some stops in between. He was on occasion, durring a unspoken movement, disguised as running bear, but that fizzled out as the simple fact the /b/ quality has a half-life of seven months (as well as a usage doublelife of i think 1 1/2 to 3 years).
That is roughly it. of course, i have this info in 40 megapixels, but... it may not be 'viral' (and death to the one who coined), but quite virulent.
Have have been anon since spring of 04. do not question me. njoi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.96.205 ( talk ) 18:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
here . I'm surprised nobody had added anything from this yet, seeing as it came out a couple months ago, and because it has a lot about 4chan and project chanology. estemshorn ( talk | contrib ) 23:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
There is a thread on /b/ about moot right now which has an image where users supposedly discovered his real life identity to be Richard Goins. There are a couple whois reports, but I'm not very familiar with how that works. I can provide the image if needed. It might be worth looking into. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent ( talk • contribs ) 08:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
I think there is some sort of error in the article; some one has changed the rickroll-section to duckroll, which, you know, is kind of funny, but not really true. Can any moderators fix this? 87.54.33.250 ( talk ) 09:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
No, the duckroll was first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.160.8 ( talk ) 00:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
This page needs serious editing lots of things that can be added like new raids and new memes and perhaps what is done to those posting illegal content? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous21211 ( talk • contribs ) 00:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
If any other website had half the content 4chan has they'd be raided. 70.57.26.44 ( talk ) 06:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/verizon_blocks_4chan.php ... please add this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.154.2.20 ( talk ) 11:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Protecting Our Customers and Our Network
Jim Gerace posted in PolicyBlog Wireless on February 08, 2010, 03:50 PM EST
The most important thing we offer? Our network. When our network is attacked, or at risk of attack in a way that could harm our customers' ability to make and receive calls, or use wireless multimedia and data services, we jump to action.
Recently, Verizon Wireless security and external experts detected attacks from an IP address associated with the 4Chan family of web sites that was disruptive to our customers and our network. To protect both, we eliminated connectivity to the IP address. At no time was 4Chan itself blocked. Ongoing network security team monitoring has now determined there is no longer an immediate threat. Connectivity to those sites is being restored later today.
Typically, these attacks involve someone sending hundreds of thousands of messages to wireless devices to round up active customer addresses for follow-up activity including hacker attacks. These “sweeps” can jam our network and deliver unwanted electronic messages that also can drain customer devices’ battery life and slow their operation.
We take being the nation's most reliable wireless network seriously. Seriously enough to protect our customers and our network from malicious attacks, even if we get dinged in the blogosphere. It's easy to complain about "blocking" when your wireless data connection is stable, fast and reliable. But try connecting to the web from your Droid or Blackberry when attacks slow - and potentially block - use of our network all together.
We monitor against attacks and potential attacks to ensure the integrity of the Verizon Wireless network. Our customers expect nothing less.
162.115.236.104 ( talk ) 22:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC) JNels [ reply ]
4Chan is apparently either a victim or supporter of Operation Titstorm because their homepage is covered in pornographic images.(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29#Operation_Titstor and http://www.4chan.org/ ). I believe this should be archived in the 4Chan page however editing for that page has been blocked. If there is anyone who can edit that page I ask that they do so. JackRendar ( talk ) 11:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC -6)
WHOIS suggests 2004. http://www.whois.net/whois/4chan.org MrJontyH ( talk ) 12:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Yes, the whois is correct, but for a short amount of time the domain was 4chan.net (which now redirects to .org). 121.216.207.209 ( talk ) 07:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
often used within the community to mock contributors showing an unhealthy interest in under-age girls
What the fuck? *looks at source*... this is a joke, right? Completely unreliable source. NineNineTwoThreeSix ( talk ) 05:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Another point: The references to "American incarnation", Europe, Poland and Malta make no sense. This is not some fad that spreads geographically, and the sentence seem to be written by someone who doesn't understand how 4chan in particular and the internet in general works. 88.91.87.46 ( talk ) 14:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Should there be a mentioning about the new Facebook connection and the April Fool's day prank of Web 2.0 takeover? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.239.208 ( talk ) 05:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Also, in October of 2010, /b/ agressively trolled a memorial page on FB that was being used to call for wearing of purple on 10/20/10 to commemorate victims of anti-gay bullying, highlighting Tyler Clementi and 5 other higly-publicized cases. The troll attack included use of scripted posts and images supplied at /b/, images from /b/ of popular memes such as "Son: I am homosex/Dad: I am dissapoint", use of Guy Fawkes masks for fake profiles, "For the lulz", and "an hero". Signed, eponymous (not logged in) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.216.234.115 ( talk ) 05:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
The source linked wasn't a reliable source and is a WP:BLP violation. Neither of the reliable sources (one of which doesn't even work) name the individual, nor do they indicate that anyone by this name was convicted of abusing a cat. They also likely wouldn't since the individual is a minor. Not sure when that was added, but if there is other content in the article of that nature its status as a FA should be revisted as that kind of stuff would completely invalidate it.-- Crossmr ( talk ) 08:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
This is minor, but thought I'd bring it up. The article says, "4chan was started in 2003 in the bedroom of a 15-year old student from New York City", but the Wall Street Journal referenced says he grew up in suburban New York (near NYC). — Sebquantic ( talk ) 20:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
I recently made changes to the Triforce section which were promptly removed along with the original paragraph for not having any verifiability. There is a page on Know Your Meme, along with various other sites containing either information about Triforcing or information about how to achieve one. Surely if an editor hadn't have removed the section they would have sufficed. Thanks, DotComCairney 11:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
You should note that moot has also said he is working on a new project and has registered the domain of canv.as. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.36.88 ( talk ) 11:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Brought here as reference material, for later use. KyuuA4 ( Talk:キュウ ) 20:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
It was touched upon briefly in the AT&T section, but the extent of the situation I believe requires a bit more coverage. Kimmo Alm, the owner of AnonTalk, has gone so far as to make death threats against moot, and is one of the most prolific spammers 4chan has ever seen. One of 4chan's subdomains, a textboard called Tinychan found at http://tiny.4chan.org has been a particular target, with Alm claiming that it is an "illegal clone" of his work. I haven't contributed to Wikipedia in many years, but I find this to be fascinating. It is also notable that AnonTalk, or Kimmo Alm rather has targeted Wikipedia with his spam. He has tried to advertise his various sites here, and I believe URLs of his sites are to this day blacklisted because of the spamming. It is also worth noting, on the AT&T section, that AnonTalk lost it's domain name for refusing to take down a link to a torrent full of child pornography. Simply put it should say "AnonTalk" instead of "AnonTalk.com," since that URL now redirects to an unrelated anonymous BBS. These events definitely meet the notability standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.50.90.217 ( talk ) 05:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
I support this. Gunlog Alm ( talk ) 04:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Quite honestly, Pedobear is not used only to indicate a liking toward prepubescent girls but also boys. This sentence should be corrected:
Thanks.
- 98.19.145.226 ( talk ) 22:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Specifically under "Media Attacks" -> "Internet Attention" -> 6th paragraph, the BBC article does not report that 4chan itself claimed responsibility, but simply certain 4chan members which have no affiliation with 4chan as an organization. 129.21.129.74 ( talk ) 23:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
I propose to add the current "hacking" of youtube. 4chan has used this code (sorry, cannot place code without messing with the html script of this page) to place a scrolling marque of text in the comment section of youtube, disallowing other comments to be posted and embedded links to work on the webpage. Among other invalid links was the "Flag as Inappropriate" button, allowing pornography, redirection links and other inappropriate content to be hosted on youtube.com. 4chan.org has archived the thread, and the raid is documented on "Knowyourmeme.com". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.64.150 ( talk ) 13:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
This needs to be added in media attention: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10506482.stm Sherenk ( talk ) 06:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
All of the past events involving Justin Bieber (Last FM Hacking, Posting Gore on his official Facebook, Sending him to North Korea, etc.) should be added to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude018219293 ( talk • contribs ) 19:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
There are no hard evidence that can show that 4chan did anything bad with justin bieber.I would love to see actual evidence and not only some wild hypothesis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Portugueseboy123 ( talk • contribs ) 22:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC) — Portugueseboy123 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [ reply ]
m00t is not living with his mother, unemployed. If you watch the TED video, which is already referred to in this article, he says that he is living in an apartment and is working.
This should be fixed. 173.57.61.233 ( talk ) 06:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
M00t had to testify in the Sarah Palin email hack case to describe 4chan. It includes a lot of very basic descriptions of the site and the boards, so it would be useful. PDF here . Steven Walling 18:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
I would be changing this myself, but the article is locked (which is probably for the best).
I am refering to the line "In July 2010, members of 4chan launched a campaign of bullying and harassment against an 11-year-old girl, resulting in her being placed under police protection."
In order for this line to remain in this wikipedia page, you must do several things.
1) Provide a reliable source which states that it was 4chan users behind these attacks
2) Provide irrefutable proof that these attacks were part of some orgnaised campaign, rather than each person simply responding to this girl individually.
1 and 2 should cover verifyable, although I already know that neither of these can occur so I don't know why I'm even writing this.
3) Rewrite it in a neutral tone. Also a staple of wikipedia's rules. That line was clearly written by someone who did not see the video of Jessie threatening to "pop a glock in [people's] mouth and make a brain slushie." It was written by someone who first heard of this person after the story reached mainstream news, and who never visited 4chan to find their perspective.
So we have a line in an article in wikipedia that is making moral judgements about unverified events without even presenting the point of view of those it has condemned.
My ideal solution is to delete the offending line, the entire Jessie Slaughter event is not a significant one in the history of 4chan, and takes up valuable space that could be more easily replaced with much more interesting and informative matters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.56.71.50 ( talk ) 10:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Someone needs to update the picture, because they've added a new board since the current picture was taken. -- 70.134.48.188 ( talk ) 17:25, 23 August 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
Now THAT'S a good source - [13] 159.182.1.4 ( talk ) 13:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
This month's Technology Review article about moot & 4chan, by Julian Dibbell , is probably an even better source: [14] . Dreamyshade ( talk ) 17:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
The irish times deems to require a login to work fully, so the article should p
Pornsavant.Com
Asslicking Bbw
Pic Family Sex