4chan Porn Boards
🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
4chan Porn Boards
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A screenshot containing a list of 4chan's boards
↑ moot (October 1, 2003). "Welcome" . 4chan . Retrieved August 2, 2008 .
↑ Lev Grossman (September 9, 2008). "The Master of Memes" . TIME . Archived from the original on 2008-07-24 . Retrieved 2008-08-01 .
↑ Nick Douglas (January 18, 2008). "What The Hell Are 4chan, ED, Something Awful, And "b"?" . Gawker.com . Retrieved 2008-08-01 .
↑ Jamin Brophy-Warren (September 9, 2008). "Modest Web Site Is Behind a Bevy of Memes" . The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved 2008-08-01 .
↑ David Sarno (2008-05-25). "Web Scout exclusive! Rick Astley, king of the 'Rickroll,' talks about his song's second coming" . The Los Angeles Times . Retrieved January 8, 2008 .
This short article about technology can be made longer. You can help Wikipedia by adding to it .
Welcome to a sneak preview of the new design for Wikipedia!
We would love your feedback on our changes
4chan is an English language website based on the Japanese Futaba Channel where people can post and discuss pictures and other images. Sites such as these are called imageboards. It was started in 2003 by "moot" also known as Christopher Poole, who was 15 years old at the time. On the website, users post pictures and discuss them. When the site started, it was for discussing anime and manga , but now many other topics are discussed. [2] One of the boards on the site, called "/b/", is dedicated to random topics and is often mentioned in media . [3] Several Internet memes have started at 4chan, including lolcats and rickrolling . [4] [5] People have associated it with the alt-right , Neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers , as well as those part of the Red-Brown coalition, due to there being sections devoted to them.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
^ Johnston, Casey (September 9, 2014). "Chat logs show how 4chan users created #GamerGate controversy" . Ars Technica . Archived from the original on September 13, 2014 . Retrieved September 14, 2014 . {{ cite web }} : Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored ( |url-status= suggested) ( help )
Welcome to a sneak preview of the new design for Wikipedia!
We would love your feedback on our changes
At the moment there is an ongoing case in Germany where a 9 year old boy where murdered by 19 year old Marcel Hesse. He is still on the run. And there murder was leaked thru /b/ don't know if this is worth for controversial part of the Wiki. Nimbrod ( talk ) —Preceding undated comment added 09:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Within German Facebook pages there is an archive link to that thread on 4chan. But I'm not sure if I should post this here. Nimbrod ( talk ) —Preceding undated comment added 11:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Yeah I read this too. As far as I understood it he posted after the secound murder Picturesof him in the kitchen of the victim. The people were all crazy. got friends from thst area and they were all in state of emergency. special those with kids as the same age as the first victim. a sidenote I read in local news about it the stepfather of the first victim is a Bandidos Member and they allready shout out that they want revange for this. This is also a reason why they don't say a single word where he is imprissioned. That is some real insane stuff. Nimbrod ( talk ) —Preceding undated comment added 07:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
The users of 4chan have garnered some attention over the past few weeks for pulling a prank on Lebeouf's "He Will Not Divide Us" exhibit, which has been moved three times due to the pranksters' persistent harassment of the project. In the latest event, the users managed to track down, steal, and replace a white flag emblazoned with the message "He Will Not Divide Us" that Shia had raised less than 48 hours earlier, in exchange for a MAGA hat. Given the social media and press coverage of the occurrence, it seems to be one of the most recent and noteworthy pranks to come out of the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paw of Death ( talk • contribs ) 08:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
[1]
[2]
[3] Reply [ reply ]
4chan has been linked to the 2017 Westminster attack in this news article . It is speculative at the moment and the regulars discussing this on 4chan are not convinced that it is linked. It isn't as clear as the potential link in the Marcel Hesse case in the thread above.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦ (talk to me) 19:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Does the arrest of someone for posting on 4chan of what was deemed a credible threat by the FBI warrant a brief mention within the article within the 'Threats of violence' section? Or would it not qualify since there was no genuine threat involved? (Although currently similar cases are mentioned.) Alcherin ( talk ) 23:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I can't edit this in but Hwndu should be a part of this article for sure.
And for the Timmy thing, I'm pretty sure that was on /b/ not pol. Same goes for the child porn. I may be wrong though. Supernaturalsamantha ( talk ) 06:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Why is 4chan under Politically Incorrect? also you guys should mention the attack on Tumblr where tumblr users went to "war" against 4chan and 4chan responded by literally crushing them.
Also gamergate is biased too. At least mention how gamers viewed Zoe Quinn's and the feminists' allegations as false, misunderstood, and sexist/racist against them for advocating the "privelaged white male manbaby who is a sex addict/racist" and how the sjws attempted to use their positive media attention to censor the gaming community — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian2bp5 ( talk • contribs ) 05:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Yes /pol/ is politically incorrect, and /b/ stands for random. These are the 2 most well know boards. There are also boards for origami, cooking, tv and film, diy, anime of all sorts, sports, music, literature etc. Yet you say 4chan is politically incorrect cause of 1 of its 2 main boards are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.13.114.103 ( talk ) 13:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
The editors have judged the entirety of 4chan by a misconception of the content of ONE board; /pol/. They go on to throw their silly buzzwords around, while including quotes from left-wing mainstream media outlets, while delibrately not including quotes from media outlets of individuals who see no problem with 4chan.
Don't judge a book by it's cover, especially when you haven't even seen the cover.
Mitch01themonkey ( talk ) 11:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Hi there! I'm the editor who wrote and maintains the /pol/ section. I'd like to address a few of the issues raised above.
This is mentioned simply because "Politically Incorrect" is the board's actual title. Similarly, the /b/ section mentions /b/'s title.
Sections about other boards are allowed if they pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines , which requires mention by independent, third-party sources . If you can find such sources discussing, say, /ck/ or /o/, I welcome you to add the respective sections.
The /pol/ section is largely self-contained and was added in August 2015 - much of the rest of the article was written long before then.
Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view ; any sources cited must be reliable . To the best of my knowledge, the /pol/ section's content satisfies both of these criteria. I wrote about notable /pol/-related events in a neutral manner while citing reliable sources. Other editors are welcome to edit the section with additional content that meets the above guidelines.
3hunna ( talk ) 23:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Gamergate is relevant as a harassment campaign, not as a donation campaign which created a video game character (see for example the Gamergate Wikipedia article; the intro doesn't mention either).
I propose to add the following after the first sentence:
The false allegations were followed by a harassment campaign against several women in the video game industry, organized by 4chan users. [1]
I also propose to delete the next two sentences about donations and video game characters as they are about minor details which are not relevant for a short summary. Even the sources for it only mention it in passing, while focusing on the harassment campaign. Zukorrom ( talk ) 08:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Request to change the wording of this sentence from
The site has been linked to Internet subcultures and activism, most notably Anonymous, the alt-right and Project Chanology.
To
The site has been linked to various Internet subcultures and activism groups, most notably Anonymous, the alt-right and Project Chanology.
Why? Because it sounds better. 2600:100B:B11D:59BE:18A1:BAC5:1CE0:49DB ( talk ) 02:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
This may be notable enough to be included in the article:
71.182.241.158 ( talk ) 06:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Currently, the gamergate section describes it as a movement which collects donations for video games and invents video game characters. Half of the paragraph is dedicated to these minor details, and the harassment for which gamergate is primarily known is not mentioned.
Looking at the Gamergate_controversy wiki article - which is the result of a long search for consensus -, we can see that it is primarily a harassment campaign. The article does not mention game characters, and correctly puts the donations in context: It was a PR campaign.
This is also how the sources given in this article present the issue. The first is an article about the harassment which only mentions the game character in passing (it doesn't mention donations). The second is about the character, but prominently discusses the harassment. About the character and the donations, it says it was done out of "spite", because "4chan’s gaming community [...] developed a taste for blood", and in their own words to "troll everyone", including the "tards in the media".
As it is, this is a clear case of false balance, which isn't supported by the given sources.
I already suggested an easy way to fix this (see above). I would like to try to find a consensus on this, so this article represents the current state of notable sources. Zukorrom ( talk ) —Preceding undated comment added 08:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
the sale didn't complete and the piece was re-listed and sold for $102.50 plus $17.08
http://www.ebay.com/itm/-/221518212263 ?
Se non è vero è ben trovato — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.23.16 ( talk ) 18:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Request for a proper reference to support this statement in the /pol/ section:
"/pol/ was created in October 2011 as a rebranding of 4chan's news board, /new/."
The reference given makes no mention of /pol/ or /new/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nancy Graham ( talk • contribs ) 18:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
This article is outdated and looks like it was written years ago and barely updated to house the more recent parts of 4chan history. Many of the most mentioned memes such as LOLCATS were part of a long since passed era in 4chan history and are not longer used on 4chan. Many modern memes and events devised on 4chan are barely mentioned if not at all. While notable memories of 4chan should always exist here, the lack of maintenance on this article regarding the changes in 4chan culture and recent history really gets to me. This is not a call to completely reform the article, just a call to update the article -- Blysbane ( talk ) 00:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Re this edit : the image of Longcat and the space shuttle went a long time ago. Also, there is no need to show images which have been blanked out. Here is a screenshot of the 4chan main page as of 2 January 2018.- ♦Ian Ma c M♦ (talk to me) 06:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
4chan is also a hotbed of conspiracy theories (e.g. Pizzagate and the recent claims that one of the students speaking out about the Florida high school shooting is actually a paid actor. Shouldn't this aspect of 4chan be mentioned in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.59.66.123 ( talk ) 02:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
This is a very well put together article given that there really is not that much information present. Most of the facts are supported with articles to back them up. An example of this is in reference to the high profile hacks that have materialized from 4chan. The news links for the different adventures of the site still work, and the article itself is definitely neutral. This is important because it is difficult to find a vast amount of information on the site that is more factual than anecdotal.
Jabjab444 ( talk ) 06:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Abdulle june 20, 2018 Jabjab444 ( talk ) 06:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Re this edit : as they say on 4chan, "It's Still Shitposting Even If You Are Being Ironic". [8] 4chan is also famous for the disclaimer that it gives, which is "The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact". However, when it comes to specific threats of violence, saying that it is irony is not going to impress law enforcement.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦ (talk to me) 05:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Why are there sections dedicated to this? It's not really relevant to 4chan in my humble opinion, and certainly not of encyclopedic reference to that. Honestly that stuff falls more under Encyclopedia Dramatica territory and I propose a full removal of those sections here. QuillOmega0 ( talk ) 03:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Long story short, I saw the mention of "Alt-right" as a subculture of 4chan, I thought it was suspicious since I've never heard of the alt-right taking refuge on 4chan, so I looked at the 2 sources provided. To my surprise (yes I'm using that ironically), no mention of the alt-right in the articles. I request that the group's mention be deleted, since no credible source has been provided. 216.167.232.155 ( talk ) 23:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Searching for Greentexting redirects here. While appropiate, considering the origins of greentexts as a writing style, the article makes no mentions of greentexts at all. I suggest either a section be added or the redirect be removed so a separate article can be made at some point. As an aside, I'd like to mention that "Greentext" as a term is far more common in usage than "Greentexting", and should be replaced as to fit the termo most users would use to search for this. 87.223.3.46 ( talk ) 14:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
A lot of the mentions of the memes that 4chan has created or popularised feels older and fails to meantion more recent examples.
I'm no wikipedist, but recently I came upon interesting article [1] about how one anonymous user of 4chan advanced permutation problem. It would be neat if some better encyclopedist could incorporate it into article so it shows that 4chan is not just about shitposting 109.81.211.130 ( talk ) 23:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Put in words "now infamous" to clarify that it is now known for the damage it has done, especially with Jessi Slaughter. UpWithJimmy ( talk ) 19:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC) UpWithJimmy ( talk ) 19:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I want that added to the intro paragraph! UpWithJimmy ( talk ) 18:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Check it out at /b/ . If anyone has ideas about moving content from here to there then post to Talk:/b/ .
The archives here are substantial and many discussions here talk about /b/. I read some but not all of them. If anyone is aware of pending editorial issues to sort out with /b/ then please post them on the talk page there.
Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Cite #55 is offensive and need to be changed. 2001:EE0:4081:2918:DE3:D8E2:C81C:4422 ( talk ) 14:27, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
There is a problem here, because people are going to read the text of the article and ask "But why is the site antisemitic?" Templates, categories etc should explain material that is discussed within the article. 4chan is the home of the Happy Merchant , but it is hard to say this because Know Your Meme is not considered a reliable source. Anyway, templates should not make statements that cannot be supported by the text and citations in the article. Anitisemitism is in the alt-right template at the bottom of the page, and this has various links explaining the type of content on the site.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦ (talk to me) 16:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I think for the neutrality of the article this should be added.
Source: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-measure-of-hate-on-4chan-627922/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aberlin2 ( talk • contribs ) 11:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
add /mu/ to list of notable imageboards
Include connections in this to Neutral Milk Hotel, the /mu/core list, Anthony Fantano, Piero Scaruffi, and RateYourMusic 2601:186:4301:CDE0:C4F5:2365:4F7A:6F3 ( talk ) 00:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Apparently, 4chan found a syrian rebellion camp, called an airstrike on it. They also found an ISIS training site. Bit murky, but it certainly seems possible.
-- SkynetPR ( talk ) 16:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
It should be mentioned in the first five sentences that 4chan is closely linked to right-wing extremism, misogyny and several terrorist attacks. It is also not clear why the German Domestic Intelligence Agency officially classifies the site as an extremist platform. It is quite clear to anyone who knows the site and has followed the news of the last few years that there is a more than coincidental connection between 4chan and right-wing extremism from the sources and the article unfortunately the introduction does not show this yet. I would suggest that the introduction should read: "The website has become internationally known for its links to right-wing extremist and misogynist terror". The sentence "Launched by Christopher Poole in October 2003, the site was created as a counterpart to the Japanese imageboard Futaba Channel, also known as 2chan." could be postponed a bit, since it is certainly interesting, but the historical context of origin is probably secondary for most people who deal with 4chan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aberlin2 ( talk • contribs ) 14:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Hey guys, I was taking a look at the notable imageboards, and while of course /pol/ and /b/ are hot topics with them being as controversial as they are, there is not really reference to the other message boards at all, besides the quick mention of the varying topics in the intro. I think it would help to the neutrality of the article if there was a quick blurb or a small section on its own on a few of the other larger imageboards on 4chan it would really help support that 4chan is not entirely alt-right neo-nazis. Madden4400 ( talk ) 00:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
First, my COI. See my user page, I'm Fredrick Brennan . This can be seen as a COI due to my longstanding feud with Jim Watkins over 8chan . However, I've edited for years at this point and know our policies well. M
The Last Semester Episodes
Lynaritaa Nip Slip
Hannah Herzsprung Nude