4chan Adult Gif Archive
🛑 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
4chan Adult Gif Archive
Give good old Wikipedia a great new look:
This article was just edited, click to reload
Oh no, there's been an error
Please help us solve this error by emailing us at support@wikiwand.com
Let us know what you've done that caused this error, what browser you're using, and whether you have any special extensions/add-ons installed.
Thank you!
You can help our automatic cover photo selection by reporting an unsuitable photo.
Your input will affect cover photo selection, along with input from other users.
Raptor Jesus is not a meme, I've been on 4chan for a few years and I have only seen it a few times. Also, the 'Evil Embassador' description for the Gendo meme needs to be removed, as nobody refers to Gendo as the Evil Embassador except maybe the person who wrote it.
Some in the Tuner community have adopted this meme to often degrade and label Honda owners whom claim their cars can go fast when it reality, they do not. It techniclly qualifies because it's use has gone outside of 4Chan, abeit it's more of a reality thing than a website thing.
Robert Bopkins is the name of a proffessor at Stanford, and the same man now known as "Old Moot" (curly black hair and glasses). Moot's real name has never been revealed. 71.224.246.205 03:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
SEE???? I KNOW MY TRIP! ITS MOOT#FAGGOT!!
71.224.246.205 21:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Apparently his first name is Doug, since moot is (or was) wordfiltered to doug, and on the front page, he posts a "dougnote". SAlpsu 21:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Should something be added about the site being down today because of (apparently) a ddos attack?--88.105.251.88 23:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I've heard people talking about it being due to a DDoS on GameFAQs (not a reliable source, I know) and this crash seems to be different to the usual kind. We might see when it's back up and moot posts something.--88.105.251.88 02:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Don't add reports here when 4chan goes down. Go find some other internet forum to chat on. Ashibaka tock 19:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
The /b/ imageboard once again has forced anonymous posting. (January 29, 2006) Just an anonymous remembering reading about it on wikipedia, thought I should bring it up.
There should be an entry about the epic sticky in /B/ yesterday. "Is this reality" countered with "Is this fantasy" turned into a bohemian rhapsody thread which in turn ate god's face.
Where is Sarah Connor, A huge gaping vagina the size of a hallway(aka mordor), Tom Delay, What happened to /F/, A better explanation of just what the hell is going on on that damn website. There's a lot of n00bs who'd like to know.
35 google hits "lurk moar" DyslexicEditor 12:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I thought it was T H C-chan, since the character is a pothead, etc. I mean, I've seen it as TCC-chan since the initial posting, but you know how /b/tards aren't bound by restrictions like fact. -- Sporkot 03:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I don't think it really belongs here- it's kind of the 420chan mascot.
TCC stands for "The Crackhead Clubhouse", the drug discussion forum on SomethingAwful which originally used this mascot. 420chan has indeed adopted her, but kept the name. TCC images are occassionally posted to /b promising cp floods etc on 420chan. Fortunately these are virtually always lies to troll pedos. 420chan /b features a disturbing amount of loli though due to Kirtaner's relatively lenient moderation.
Was this deleted as a popular meme? I've re-added it as I think it's a worthy addition - far worthier than some others on there in fact. The text needs expanding and stuff, I only wrote a very rough description. Tphi 15:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Well it's gone again. Why? DyslexicEditor 12:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Should we add the 'I WAS BORN INTO A WORLD YOU MAY NOT UNDERSTAND'?
It's become popular in /b/ (in where someone posts a picture of violet from UltaViolet or whatever with the caption above, followed by random images being post with the same, or slightly altered caption) for about three days.
See if it's still there in a month. In my opinion, the memes listed should be limited to just those that have been around long enough to be truly notable. Tphi 13:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Is it really shut down? Anyone who can do a whois search knows that it is hosted on the same servers as 4chan is. I, and others, just assumed it went down with cgi--193.195.185.254 21:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
No, it seems to be back up. Must've been recent, they're still talking about it. -- SheeEttin 21:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
It was never 'shut down.' They were just switching servers around.
Shii this article is crap and has a ton of errors and inaccuracies. I thought you were supposed to be maintaining this :( WHY SHII WHY. -- moot 07:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
As it's pretty much irrelevant to the history. (The fight: Fred allegedly created hentai images, and managed to get all traces of them erased from the internet. 4Chan/b/ has, as of yet, not been able to find the images.)
Something on the same topic has been readded, but I don't think it should be there. I really don't think anything should be considered notable unless it's still remembered next month, at least. MrVacBob 18:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I don't see how /b/ "lost"--88.105.248.92 02:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
/b/ however, found a page that had the title, "Blurred" in http://www.archive.org , which is apparently the title of the loli manga that Fred wrote. But images were not recorded, so nothing remains proven.
05/08/06 - /b/ managed to find around 6 images from the blurred gallery, and some internet archive links prove they are legit
As for the remembered next month, the /b/ board on 4chan remembers it to this day, and it is still a very hot button issue. Even mentioning it starts up major arguments. The fred images have been verified by internet archive links. I can add more info but i'd rather not, as /b/ has a habit of attacking things they do not agree with. Megatokyo and fredart's forums were took a major beating sometime earlier today, they were forced to disable new user registration as a result of it! 69.145.36.133 13:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
The link to 420chan in the cracky section has been removed for possible 'privacy violation' reasons. I disagree, since :
Also the "see below" regarding her age no longer makes sense without this context. Again, she freely made her approximate age in the photos public (without even being asked in fact) and this is important as it means the semi-nude pictures in the "witch" series are legally dubious in most countries.
I read the cracky chan story on here and another place and I'm still unsure about it. I know she had face shots of her with a clown face and mouse ears and she needed dental work. Aside from that what exactly happened? I heard at another source she only posted a few pictures and then people found them on her live journal? In this talk page you say she posted naked pictures of herself in 4chan--is this true? DyslexicEditor 12:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Hmm I found a picture archive [1] and an art archive [2] DyslexicEditor 12:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
-- DyslexicEditor : There are topless shots in the "witch" series, but CrackyPedia doesn't carry them, and they may be underage. She never posted them to 4chan, only to the scarecrowmaiden LJ, but this was quickly discovered by trolltalk et al and they were subsequently posted by others to 4chan.
Cracky says in the 420chan thread the only pics she ever posted to 4chan were the early "sup 4chan" etc ones, a moment of madness due to being somewhat drunk on vodka.
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/April_Furs_Day
Can someone verify this? Did this truly happen? If so, I think it should be added here. DyslexicEditor 12:12, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Aha!! I found another source. http://furry.wikicities.com/wiki/4chan Apparently it has a short bit about "April Fur's Day". DyslexicEditor 13:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Should the april furs day link go on the article? DyslexicEditor 03:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
No. Ashibaka tock 05:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Why not?
El jefe04 10:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Much of this article is copied exactly from http://www.wikiworld.com/wiki/index.php/4chan (a source of the article) without even trying to hide it. DyslexicEditor 12:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
The article needs mention of "Shii" DyslexicEditor 13:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I'm trying to make this article more accurate and coherent. Thank god the memes were removed and linked back to WikiWorld. This article shouldn't be a meme repository, there are other sites for that. Fixed some inaccuracies, will work on fixing whatever is left and grammar later. -- moot 01:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
\\ Reply [ reply ]
While I agree with taking the memes off this article, I was thinking about a separate page for a list of 4chan memes, it worked well for YTMND , and I think it would for a website as big as 4chan. Nightmare X 18:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
The memes should be back in the article. They're verified, they're funny and they are important to give somebody a basic information of what is 4chan about. This article without the Memes-List is basically like a Video Game Preview without Screenshots.
It's alright guys, Wikipedia is just too good for 4chan. Doyel 15:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
My 2 cents, the memes need to be in the article, at least a few of the base ones. The wikiworld site is down 90% of the time, making it nearly useless. I fail to see how the memes are "unverifiable" - go to 4chan's /b/ board for about 10 minutes and you will see most of the memes. TheGreatTK 13:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
What do you guys think about a section in this article about notable things 4chan has done in general? Personally, I think making "baby sister" the number one result on the poll for "What Your Anti-Drug?" is close to 2channel's "Masashi Tashiro - TIME Man of the Year" stunt. Somehow, I don't think it will stop there, so it may be a good idea to record them here. - Grobda, 03/17/06
I wanted to delete the addition of the Japanese translation of the warning next to the link to 4chan at the bottom of this article. I erred on the side of caution and didn't, though. I really doubt this is necessary, since this is the English Wikipedia, but I could be wrong. Thoughts? -- Sporkot 02:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
What's up with this meme? I remember first seeing it come to /b/ August 2005, but I never really understood it. Is it linked to the 'desu' meme? Date: Today. Anonymous
It's missing from the list of memes, and I was really looking forward to an explination for this meme.
It's nearly the same as WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY, it's Dio's Japan-ified yell of "THE WORLD!"
Does anyone have the IP address for 420chan as it is still unacessible due to DNS problems?
Sorry, but I have the same request, but for 4chan itself, specifically the img server. any help?
Stay the hell away from 4chan. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.2.42.137 ( talk • contribs ) .
What the heck is the point of tagging the anonimity section for cleanup? If we're going after "original research", that's kind of ridiculous since any article about an internet site is going to come from firsthand knowledge and experience. Furthermore, most of these "citations" that people so desperately seek aren't going to be available for 4chan. Threads get pruned relatively fast, and as far as I know, there is no perpetual link or archive. As a result, many of the statements in this article will be based in fact, but will not have an available primary source. I understand we're trying to shape Wikipedia into a more credible information base, but it's getting ridiculous. -- Sporkot 23:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I understand that a lot of people are getting a 404 error specifically when trying to get to the /b/ board. Apparently this is because the ISP people in BT have seen fit to block access to it by their customers due to the frequency of CP and other illegal content. It needs verification first, but if this is indeed the case I think it deserves a mention in the article because it means a large proportion of UK broadband users can't get to /b/ :'(
Wikipedia is not a place to discuss this; however, I invite you to http://4-ch.net/net/kareha.pl/1146266842/13- to discuss it freely. Ashibaka tock 03:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
--So one of these days, I was browsing 4chan and I found these user-made posts, that made me really interested in the true nature of a /b/tard:
Take out the REAL pedos, rascists and porn obsessed from the 4channers,
Remove the crazy yaoi fan girls and the underage b/ posters who think they are hardcore,
Then you have a core of intelligent, fun, witty, caring people who act drunk to relax (b/) or look at pretty artwork (c/ w/ a/ cm/ n/ etc) or fap to wind down after a tough day in a normal tough life.
You'd be amazed but the average b/tard is mature enough, with an IQ over 120, interest in politics, world events and people in general, love for free speech enough to tolerate a few sick fucks and no mercy for those who take themselves too seriously.
B/ is our way of winding down, dedramatizing stuff, having a laugh and toughening ourselves up to prepare for tomorrow morning when we have to face life again.
Many of us are not white, straight, in love with inaccessible little girls, american, healthy, rich, in a happy family, in a great job, convinced that our country is run intelligently, with a simple sexuality and no personal drama in our past or present... but on b/ no one cares, all is mirth, all are anonymous!
For a short while we become the giddy crowd, the hooligans, the satires and the councellors without gender color or difference... We become legion and are free from all social restrain, free from censorship and free from ourselves. The trolls at the heart of b/ have understood how precious that is.
Never underestimate anonymous, never judge us on what is displayed: what you are seeing is just us on the potent drug of utter freedom.
Not needed, and is that Copypasta? -- Alexie 00:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I'm sorry, I'm not very good at wikipedia but I'd like the 4Chan article to be as good as possible out of respect for Mother 4Chan. Would it be a worthy idea to elaborate on the function of the boards in the article and possibly create another section of the article on them? I think this should be done, seeing as most of the article focuses on memes and /b/ which seems to be the only thing people here see in 4Chan. I want to ask before I write this and make sure people know about the edit so some people can proofread what I wrote for factuality and formatting and whatnot after I actually write it. Input pl0z? Also is this signed properly?
-- Shinta 03:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Ste4k 08:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I was recently browsing through a very anti-4chan message board, and I heard the phase 420chan. Obviously I had no intention of going to the site directly, so I decided to use wikipedia.
Now I'm already familiar with the background/controversy that is not4chan, and can see it was mentioned in its own little section. But why was I forwarded into an article with no mention of this site? Inclusion plz? 86.133.33.135 19:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
I've been looking at some other wiki pages for sites like YTMND and they mention conflicts with other sites and raids, such as the one aimed at Ebaumsworld (which 4chan participated in). I was wondering if 4chan's infamous sustained attacks on places like Habbo Hotel are worth mentioning. McSnuffy 17:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
MANY Habbo Raids are not stopped by mods.
I don't believe that a section should be added pertaining to raids, but I believe at least a passing reference should be made, seeing as 4chan has already been mentioned in the Ebaumsworld article concerning raids. Perhaps : "4chan members often participate in "raids" of other websites, such as Habbo Hotel and Ebaumsworld ( Steampowered 09:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)) Reply [ reply ]
The last paragraph in the first section starting with "It is unclear what warranted..." is very clearly written by a proponent of the site and someone trying to defend the site's reputation. If someone would like to step forward and make this portion neutral POV that would be great, otherwise I will return and to do it. I do not visit 4chan, but upon reading this paragraph, having my own suspicions and then visiting /b/ I saw several images of illustrated underage girls in sexual context -readily available and displayed without digging around. I think then it is very clear why the site's access was blocked - and there doesnt need to be several colloquially written sentences feigning ignorance and obliviousness as to why that happened. Deusfaux 10:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Ryulong, stop reverting my writing out. It's verfiiable and relevant information, fairly well written and not too long. Removing it over and over because having the word "cockmongler" on the page will magically attract a swarm of /b/-tards is fucking stupid, and beyond paranoid. Wikipedia has means for dealing with vandals. THESE MEANS ARE NOT YOU. CONTRIBUTE OR GET LOST MengHuo 10:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
p.s. since you're dense i should probably define the word "contribute" for you: contribute doesn't mean shredding articles of anything that might prompt trolling of any sort whatsoever. it means ADDING NEW STUFF of quality and removing stuff that is redundant or lacking quality (notice how it doesn't include removing everything that makes you afraid the page might be vandalized for 5 seconds?)
"verfiiable" -> find me the news story or scientific article that confirms this. Ashibaka tock 04:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Ryulong please stop reverting and putting back the Bel-Air part of the Meme section, it is unnecessary to be here. It is listed at the "memes and milestones" section with all the others.
This discussion page really needs to be trimmed of the idiotic comments from random editors who just wanted to be disruptive. I don't know what I should and should not archive, but the recent edit that I reverted is definitely something that should not be on a talk page, even if it is for 4chan. Ryulong 02:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Apparently the /b/tards who post it still feel like they are on 4chan. ( Steampowered 09:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)) Reply [ reply ]
Child pornography is removed as fast as possible. This does not prevent frequent posts, most in /b/. It is not known if the moderators follow lAmerican law and report the posting to the Federal and State authorities —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.180.25.88 ( talk • contribs ).
As a veteran /b/tard, I'd like to point out that copypasta has been around for quite some time, even if it hasn't been called such forever. I'd just like to know if it says that due to lack of knowledge/poor wording
Animeotk
Yolandi Visser Sex Tape
Sexy Ellie Goulding