22 Vintage

22 Vintage
22 Vintage is a 1,770 square foot house on a 7,623 square foot lot with 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. This home is currently off market . Based on Redfin's Rancho Mirage data, we estimate the home's value is $876,174.
Edit Home Facts to improve accuracy.
64 Burgundy, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
64 Burgundy, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
61 Burgundy, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
61 Burgundy, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
17 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
17 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
22 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
22 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
66 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
66 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Property Type Single Family Residential
Home facts updated by county records on Aug 24, 2022 .
Selling with Traditional Agent Selling with Redfin Agent
Get $13,143 More Selling Your Home with a Redfin Agent
School data is provided by GreatSchools , a nonprofit organization. Redfin recommends buyers and renters use GreatSchools information and ratings as a first step, and conduct their own investigation to determine their desired schools or school districts, including by contacting and visiting the schools themselves. Redfin does not endorse or guarantee this information. School service boundaries are intended to be used as a reference only; they may change and are not guaranteed to be accurate. To verify school enrollment eligibility, contact the school district directly.
Median Sale Price Median Sale Price # of Homes Sold Median Days on Market Single Family Homes All Home Types Single Family Homes Townhouses Condos/Co-ops
Based on Redfin calculations of home data from MLS and/or public records.
4 Beds , 2.5 Baths , ~ 2,500 Sq. Ft. House
Offer Not Accepted - Sold for $1.5M
Claim this home to track its value and nearby sales activity
Homes similar to 22 Vintage are listed between $499K to $2,695K at an average of $420 per square foot.
30488 Colonial Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234
30488 Colonial Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234
77 Via Las Flores, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
77 Via Las Flores, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Nearby homes similar to 22 Vintage have recently sold between $220K to $1,175K at an average of $440 per square foot.
66 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
66 Cork Tree, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
70825 Ironwood Dr, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
70825 Ironwood Dr, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
255 Loch Lomond Rd, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
255 Loch Lomond Rd, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
22 Vintage is a 1,770 square foot house on a 7,623 square foot lot with 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. This home is currently off market.
Based on Redfin's Rancho Mirage data, we estimate the home's value is $876,174
When was this home built and last sold?
How competitive is the market for this home?
Based on Redfin's market data, we calculate that market competition in 92270, this home's neighborhood, is somewhat competitive. Homes sell for about 1% below list price and go pending in around 36 days.
What comparable homes are near this home?
Comparable nearby homes include 64 Burgundy , 61 Burgundy , and 17 Cork Tree .
What’s the full address of this home?
The full address for this home is 22 Vintage, Rancho Mirage, California 92270.
GreatSchools Ratings provided by GreatSchools.org .
Redfin Estimate based on recent home sales.
The Redfin Compete Score rates how competitive an area is on a scale of 0 to 100, where 100 is the most competitive.
71530 Biskra Rd needed a strong offer to compete. Many offers were received.
Updated July 2022: By searching, you agree to the Terms of Use , and Privacy Policy .
REDFIN IS COMMITTED TO AND ABIDES BY THE FAIR HOUSING ACT AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ACT. READ REDFIN'S FAIR HOUSING POLICY .
Copyright: © 2022 Redfin. All rights reserved. Patent pending.
REDFIN and all REDFIN variants, TITLE FORWARD, WALK SCORE, and the R logos, are trademarks of Redfin Corporation, registered or pending in the USPTO.
If you are using a screen reader, or having trouble reading this website, please call Redfin Customer Support for help at 1-844-759-7732 .

Please contact Customer Service at (800) 878-4166 or unblockrequest@realtor.com with any issues. Please include the Reference ID shown above.

As you were browsing, something about your browser made us think you might be a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen, including:

Reference ID: #b267bfa8-2f48-11ed-968e-555056554178

Please complete the Challenge below, to regain access to the site.

Washington Redskins T-Shirt (L) $69.99
Florida Panthers NHL T-Shirt (XXL) $69.99
FREE SHIPPING ON ORDERS OVER $100 - USE CODE FREESHIP22

A password will be e-mailed to you.
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Home Rifles Rifles22 Vintage .22 Rimfires: In Certain Cases, Theyre Super Gun Values
You have entered an incorrect email address!
Please enter your email address here
As I write this in late July 2022, the House of Representatives is poised to pass another ban on semi-auto rifles similar to the...
Download The Full September 2022 Issue PDF Subscribe Digital Issues
© AG Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Although there are many nice new bolt-action rimfire rifles available today, some shooters prefer the look and feel, and what they perceive to be higher quality, of older rifles. Whether or not yesterday’s rimfires were of higher quality than the newest is a matter of opinion, chance, cost, and experience, and is hence arguable. Surely older rifles more commonly had real walnut stocks, and their bluing was, in some cases, exceptionally well done, even on relatively inexpensive rifles. Today, used rimfires are often bargain-priced. Some, though, are pure collector’s items and are priced accordingly.
We were fortunate to have access to three rimfire, bolt-action, magazine-fed rifles of yesteryear. Two were by Winchester, a Model 69A and a Model 320. The third was a Marlin Model 80. All of them were walnut-stocked, and all had excellent bores. The Winchester 69A was fitted with a period Weaver B4 scope and the other two had very-high-quality aperture sights. All were in near-new condition, though the 69A had been given some serious custom work. All three rifles were marked on their barrels that they took Short, Long, or Long Rifle cartridges. We decided to find out how well they performed, and if they were worth you hunting them out—assuming you can find them, and assuming they’re of comparable quality to our samples.
These variables are the downsides in this test, since we can’t reliably tell you where to find copies of any of these rifles if you decide you have to have one. However, there are some real bargains to be found in the category of used bolt-action rimfire rifles. We suggest you check pawn shops, gun shows, used racks at gun shops, and publications like Gun List or Shotgun News.
What we can tell you in these pages are the strengths and weaknesses of these models as you might expect to find them in the used-gun market today. To our surprise, the vintage guns in this test shot very well, and cost very little relative to what new rimfires run. Thus, in our estimation, they are not only vintage .22s, they are also bargain .22s.
Winchester 69A Our recommendation: The Winchester 69 was made from 1935 to 1963 in a variety of options that include the 69A, and in both a Target and Match version. This gun cost only $40 at a pawn shop nearly a quarter-century ago. We doubt you could find one for that amount today, but $100 to $125 wouldn’t be out of the question—and for that money, we’d jump on it.
At the time of its initial purchase, this particular Winchester exhibited target-rifle accuracy, we were told. It could put five shots into 0.33 inch at 50 yards, using its old Weaver B4 scope and RWS Match ammunition. The owner has tested many brands of ammunition in this rifle and has come to prefer CCI Stingers for all purposes.
Our test Winchester 69A was a takedown rifle with five-shot magazine. All three rifles tested here were take-downs, in that one large slotted-head bolt allowed the removal of the action from the stock, resulting in two shorter pieces for easier transportation or storage. The magazine release of the 69A was a prominent button protruding from a hole in the left side of the stock. This was unsightly, but the wood in the hole was rendered black, and that improved the overall look. The all-steel magazine fit well and protruded only slightly, and that helped to give the rifle an attractive profile.
The barrel was 25 inches long. The length of pull was 13.5 inches. The rifle weighed 6.3 pounds, and together these specifications made this rifle thoroughly suited for adults.
The receiver was drilled and tapped on the left rear for a Lyman Model 57A receiver sight, which accompanied the rifle. We chose to test the rifle with the scope because mounting the aperture would have required removing the barrel-mounted rear sight with its step-adjustable U-notch. It was dovetailed into the barrel, and we didn’t want to tamper with it. There was a dovetailed front bead without hood. At the range, we verified the owner’s claim of outstanding accuracy. We fired groups with CCI Stingers, Federal Gold Medal Match, and Winchester Power Point ammunition. We also tried it with Federal .22 Long Hi-Power and with CCI Short hollowpoint ammunition, and it fed everything flawlessly. The Winchester 69A preferred Stingers, giving average groups of 1.0 inch at 50 yards. We were very pleased with this rifle’s handling abilities and performance. It’s easy to see why the owner has such faith in this Winchester, and why he put so much time and effort into making it into a unique custom rifle.
The bolt was finished in what appeared to be chrome plate. The handle was slightly loose, a common condition on the Winchester Model 69 rifle. This looseness doesn’t harm its function. There were two extractors. Ejection was by a fixed block within the action, just behind the magazine. Ejection was positive except for the last round in the magazine, which seemed to come loose from the extractors and lie in the raceway on opening the bolt after the last shot. The bolt was easily removed for cleaning by pulling it rearward, depressing the trigger, and sliding the bolt out. There was a stamped safety lever at the right rear of the action. Forward was the “Fire” position.
The fit of barrel to stock was very good, with no effort to free-float it. The Weaver B4 was mounted in a Weaver Tip-Off base that was securely clamped into milled slots on top of the receiver.
The customizations mentioned before were wide ranging, but not necessarily expensive. The original trigger guard was a bent and curved strip of metal that had the appearance of having been tacked on as an afterthought. The owner inletted the trigger guard into the wood so it appeared to be an integral part of the rifle instead of just stuck on.
The owner had also adding checkering, a trigger job, slight stock reshape, and a new oil finish. The reshaped stock was nicely contoured at the wrist and pistol grip. Original stocks on Winchester Model 69s did not have these flowing lines, and they had no checkering, much less wrap-around. The forend tip had also been reshaped to a contour reminiscent of pre-’64 Model 70s.
Original 69A rifles had trigger pulls that were generally a bit creepy and broke at 3 to 5 pounds, depending on the luck of the draw. The trigger on this gun pull broke cleanly at 1.5 pounds with zero creep and minimal overtravel.
Marlin Model 80-DL Our recommendation: Our Marlin had a gorgeous piece of walnut of excellent color, grain, and even some fiddle figure in the buttstock. This wood alone would surely cost well over $100 today, but that’s one of the benefits you sometimes get with an older rifle. Depending on condition, it’s likely you can find this model starting at $100.
The Marlin we tested was in near-new condition. This model was made from 1940 to 1965, according to Modern Gun Values, 10th Ed. The 80-DL had a 24-inch barrel with Micro-Groove rifling, and was fitted with a Lyman Model 57 MR aperture sight, similar to the aperture we saw for the Winchester 69A. This sight alone would cost in the neighborhood of $100 today, but according to our reference, it may have been standard on this Marlin. It had fine click adjustments for windage and elevation, and an adjustable sliding dial for elevation indexing.
The barrel was fitted with a bead front sight on a ramp. There was provision for a sight hood, but none was fitted. The original dovetailed-in rear sight had been replaced with a wedge of steel so there would be no interference with the aperture rear. The receiver was grooved for a tip-off scope mount.
The plastic trigger guard was attached with two wood screws. It shielded a narrow trigger that appeared to be chrome plated, as was the entire bolt. The bolt head had a cleverly designed dual extractor, and the empties were ejected by a spring-loaded wire rod protruding forward from the action. This rod kept tension against the bottom of the bolt and prevented bolt rattle. Just over the rear of the chamber was another piece of spring steel that served to guide rounds into the chamber, and also provided downward pressure to the head of the bolt when it was fully closed. These features worked well, and we feel the uniform position of the closed bolt contributed to the excellent accuracy of this rifle.
The detachable magazine held eight rounds. It was tricky to remove and replace, but once inserted it stayed in place. Removal required pinching in a fore-and-aft direction. Feeding was flawless with all ammunition tried except for two failures to feed with .22 Long ammunition. The magazine well was shielded by a steel plate attached to the rifle with two fasteners, a wood screw at the front, and a through-bolt at the rear that also provided the take-down function.
The rifle weighed 6.3 pounds, exactly the same as the Winchester 69A, and its stock had pleasing, adult-dimensioned lines, with a pull of 13.75 inches. Apparently, it had been fitted originally with sling swivels, but these were absent. The finish, however, left wide-open pores throughout. This rifle would benefit greatly from a good oil-type finish, which would bring out even more of the fine wood figure. The forend was deep and narrow, and the pistol grip had a functional shape and feel. The top of the comb was slightly fluted, but the flutes could have been better integrated into the lines. There was a black buttplate that we think was made of hard rubber. It bore the Marlin name proudly on a shield, and was surrounded by checkering. The top of the buttplate was somewhat rounded. The rifle mounted easily and stayed in place well.
The trigger pull of the 80-DL was 3 pounds. It had significant creep, then a crisp letoff with a bit of overtravel. The pull felt harder than it measured because the trigger was only 0.19-inch wide. There was a sliding safety located just behind the bolt handle. Pushing it forward blocked the trigger. It worked well enough. When we first tried it, cocking (lifting) the bolt was a bit rough, though travel was quite smooth. Some lubrication fixed the hard bolt lift. Removing the bolt was accomplished by first removing the aperture slide (by pressing its button and lifting), and then pressing the trigger and withdrawing the bolt.
The barrel was bedded snugly to the stock. There was a significant gap in the wood on each side of the stock just in front of the action. The remainder of the inletting was quite good. Metal polish and bluing were outstanding, with an even, brushed look to all the steel.
At the range, the small aperture permitted us to get the most out of this rifle, and it had a lot to offer. We desperately wanted a creep-free trigger, though. The average of all groups with all ammunition was 1.3 inches at 50 yards. The smallest five-shot group was fired with Federal Gold Medal match ammo, and it measured 0.55 inch. This target ammo averaged 0.8 inch, not at all bad.
Winchester Model 320 Our recommendation: In this comparison, this gun was easily the highest-grade rifle, having a superior polish to the other two rifles, and somewhat nicer appointments throughout. As a result, it also has a higher collector value, and finding a good used one could be tougher and pricier.
This 5.7-pound rifle was the lightest, and had the shortest barrel, at 22 inches. Winchester made this from 1971 to 1974. The trigger guard was a bent piece of curved sheet metal that extended forward to also form the magazine well protection. It was inletted into the wood, rather than simply stuck onto the rifle. The take-down screw to remove the barreled action from the walnut stock was right in front of the magazine well.
The stock had good color and a bit of fiddle figure in the butt. It also had impressed checkering that was too slippery for us, in spite of its good looks. It screamed to be redone by a good checkering person. However, the Winchester 320 has considerable collector value, and it would not do to tinker with the checkering on an otherwise nearly-new and all-original rifle, like our test piece. The stock finish was non-reflective, with pores almost completely filled. The finish, however, was relatively soft and easily marked.
Inletting was outstanding. The stock shape mimicked the Model 70’s Monte Carlo without cheekpiece. The forend was more nearly square in section than that of the M70. The tip was nicely rounded. The pistol grip was slim with good-looking flutes on the top of the buttstock. The buttplate was black plastic. It had serrations to hold it in place on the shoulder, the Winchester name prominent in a shield, and—wonder of wonders—a nicely rounded top to ease mounting. It seems today’s manufacturers have forgotten some of these classic rifle-making basics.
The rifle was fitted with a (costly) Redfield target micrometer-adjust aperture sight, with replaceable-insert globe front. The Redfield sight was tall enough that it looked over the normal step-adjustable rear sight, so it remained in its dovetail in the barrel. The original front bead remained in place under the block that held the globe sight. The Redfield sight extended rearward far enough that the eye could get comfortably close to the aperture. It was possible to remove the bolt without tampering with the sights. Again, it was necessary to press the trigger to remove the bolt.
The Winchester 320’s receiver was grooved for scope mounts, and also was longitudinally grooved in a decorative manner, presumably intended to cut glare. This wasn’t enough to counteract the near-mirror polish of the receiver and barrel. The left side of the receiver held the classic Winchester logo, and the right side held a safety lever that, like that of the 69A, rocked fore and aft. Forward was Off. Instead of the stampings of the other two rifles, this safety lever was nicely machined and knurled. Unfortunately, it was all too easy to put the safety on while operating the bolt handle briskly, unless great caution was used to keep the hand entirely off the stock.
The bolt handle was pear-shaped, hollow, and nicely blued. The forward portion of the bolt was left white. The bolt head had two opposing extractors in a delightful imitation of the Marlin design, but with much more finesse. The bolt moved easily and positively.
The five-shot magazine was easily removed by pressing upward on a serrated button just behind the well. It also replaced easily, by far the easiest of the three rifle magazines to get in and out. Another nice touch, the magazine had a button-detachable floorplate for easy cleaning. The mag was all-steel but for a plastic follower. The magazine protruded down from the rifle enough to mar its otherwise attractive profile.
The trigger pull was outstanding. It broke at 3 pounds w
Naked Wrestling
Meco Sperm
Student Porn Tube

22 Vintage

Report Page