20 Trailblazers Setting The Standard In Evolution Korea
Evolution Korea
The financial crisis that hit Asia caused a major review of the traditional system of government, business alliances, as well the public management of risks. In Korea this meant an evolution of the development model.
In a controversial decision the South Korean government has asked publishers of textbooks to ignore calls to remove examples of evolution in high school science textbooks. This includes evidence of the evolution of horses and of the avian an ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A South Korean creationist group has convinced textbook publishers to eliminate evidence of evolution from high-school science texts. The Society for Textbook Revise, an independent offshoot from the Korea Association for Creation Research that aims to cleanse biology textbooks of "atheist materialism," was behind the decision. The STR claims that such materialistic thinking creates a negative picture for students, and could lead to their eventual denial of faith.
Scientists from all over the world expressed worry when the STR campaign was featured in the news. In a letter addressed to the editor of Nature the evolutionary biologist Jae Choe at Ewha Womans University in Seoul complained that South Korea had given in to religious prejudice. He was backed by colleagues around the country, who formed an organization called Evolution Korea to organize a petition against the textbook changes.
Some researchers are concerned that the STR could expand to other parts of the world, where creationism is increasing. The letter to Nature warned that the anti-evolution movement could intensify pressure for revisions to textbooks in other countries, particularly those with large Christian and Muslim populations.
South Korea's cultural background is particularly strong for the debate on evolution. 26 percent of South Koreans belong to of a religious community with the majority of them practicing Christianity or Buddhism. Many Koreans also adhere to Ch'ondogyo, an ideology based on Confucian principles that emphasizes social harmony, individual self-cultivation, and self-respect. Ch'ondogyo teaches that human beings are one with Hanulnim, the God of the Sun, and that heaven-bound blessings can be obtained through good works.
All of this has made creationism fertile field. Numerous studies have revealed that students with a religious background to be more reluctant to learn about evolution as compared to those who do not. The reasons behind this aren't obvious. One possible explanation is that students who have a religious background tend not to be as knowledgeable about scientific concepts and theories, which makes them more susceptible to the influence of creationists. Another factor could be that students with religious backgrounds might view evolution as a concept that is not a religion, which makes them feel uncomfortable.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent years, anti-evolution programs in schools have caused concern among the scientific community. A survey conducted in 2009 revealed that nearly 40 percent of Americans believed that biological evolution was not true and that it would be in conflict with their religious beliefs. Many scientists believe that despite the popularity of creationism the best method to stop this movement is to educate the public on the evidence supporting evolution.
Scientists are required to teach their students about science and the theory of evolution. They should also inform the general public about the scientific process and how knowledge from science is collected and validated. They should explain how scientific theories are frequently challenged and changed. However, misconceptions regarding the nature of scientific research often create anti-evolution beliefs.
Some people confuse the word "theory" as a hunch, or a guess. In science, however, an hypothesis is rigorously tested, and empirical data is used to verify it. A theory that is repeatedly tested and observed becomes a scientific principal.
The debate on evolution theory is a great opportunity to discuss both the importance of the scientific method and its limitations. It is crucial to be aware that science is not able to provide answers to questions about life's purpose or meaning, but allows living things to evolve and change.
A well-rounded education must include exposure to the vast majority of scientific fields including evolutionary biology. This is crucial because the jobs that people have and the decisions they make require understanding of how science functions.
The vast majority of scientists around the world agree that humans have changed over time. 에볼루션사이트 predicting adults' view of the consensus on this issue found that those who had higher levels of education and science knowledge were more likely to believe there is a broad agreement among scientists on the subject of human evolution. People with more religious beliefs and less knowledge of science tend to be more skeptical. It is essential that teachers emphasize the importance of understanding this consensus, so that people can make informed choices about the use of energy, health care and other issues of policy.
3. Evolution and Culture
Cultural evolution is a close relative of the mainstream evolutionary theory. It explores how humans and other organisms learn from each other. Researchers in this field utilize explanation models and tools adapted from those used by evolutionary theorists. they go back to human prehistory to discover the genesis of our capacity for culture.
This approach also recognizes the differences between the characteristics of culture and biological. Cultural traits can be acquired slowly while biological traits are mostly inherited simultaneously (in sexual species at fertilization). This means that the emergence of one cultural characteristic can affect the development of another.
In Korea the emergence of Western style elements in the latter part of the nineteenth and early 20th century was the result of an elaborate sequence of events. One of the most important was the arrival in Korea of Japanese occupation forces, who introduced Western hairstyles and clothing.
Then, when Japan left Korea in the 1930s, some of these trends began change. At the close of World War II, Korea was united once more and again under the Choson dynasty rule.
Today, Korea is a vibrant political and economic power. Despite the current global financial crisis, the country's economy has been growing steadily over the past decade and is expected to continue its healthy growth in the future.
However, the current government has many challenges to face. One of the biggest is its inability to develop an effective strategy to deal with the economic crisis. The crisis has exposed the weaknesses of the country's policies, especially its over-reliance on foreign investment and exports that may not last.
The crisis has shaken the confidence of investors. As a result, the government needs to rethink its strategy and find other ways to boost the domestic demand. It must also revamp the incentive monitoring, control, and discipline systems in place to guarantee the stability of the financial system. This chapter offers a variety of scenarios on how the Korean economy might develop in a post-crisis world.
4. Evolution and Education
The challenge for educators of evolution is how to teach evolutionary concepts that are appropriate for different stages of development and ages. For example, teachers must be aware of the religious diversity in their classrooms and create an environment where students with both secular and religious views feel comfortable learning evolution. Teachers must also recognize common misconceptions about evolution, and how to deal with these in their classrooms. Teachers must also have access to a variety of resources for teaching evolution and be able to find them quickly.
In this regard, the Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation had a key role in bringing evolutionary researchers and educators from various sectors to discuss the best practices for teaching Evolution. Participants included representatives from scientific societies and educational research organizations, as well as government funding agency officials and curriculum designers. The convergence of different stakeholders led to the development of some common guidelines which will serve as the basis for future actions.
One of the most important recommendations is that the study of evolution should be included in all science curricula at any level. To achieve this the National Science Education Standards (NRC) require that evolution be taught in an integrated manner across all life sciences using a sequence of ideas that are developmentally appropriate. Additionally, a new publication from the NRC provides guidance to schools on how they can integrate evolution into their life science curriculum.
Numerous studies have shown that a more comprehensive teaching of evolution can lead to higher levels of student understanding and belief in the concept of evolution. However it is difficult to determine causal effects in the classroom is difficult because school curriculums are not assigned randomly and change over time as a result of the predetermined dates of gubernatorial election and state board of education appointments. To overcome this problem I employ an ongoing data set that allows me to account for state and year fixed effects and individual-level variation in teacher beliefs about changes in the curriculum.
Teachers who are more comfortable in teaching evolution have less internal barriers. This is in line with the hypothesis that more experienced faculty are less likely to be hesitant about evolution-related topics in the classroom, and could be more likely to employ strategies such as a reconciliatory approach known to increase the acceptance of undergraduate students of evolution.