15 17 Teen

🛑 👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 INFORMATION AVAILABLE CLICK HERE👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Hang out at Club O2®, the best spot for Teens Ages 15 to 17 where it’s all about what YOU want to do. You can watch movies, listen to music, dance, jam out at karaoke, and maybe even attend Carnival’s version of prom! Each ship has a designated Club O2 Leader who is responsible for overseeing the program and lounge.
Medication
The youth staff may not administer any medication to any child participating in the youth programs. Additionally, no medications with the exception of epi-pens and self-using inhalers are permitted in the youth programs. Epi-pens and self-using inhalers cannot be expired. If a child requires regular medication while attending, parents/guardians must return to administer the medication. If a child becomes unruly or ill as a result of parent/guardian not administering medication, the child will not be permitted back into the program. 
Hours (time/activity may vary based on cruise itinerary)
Sea Days 
Activities in Club O2 (activities may vary based on cruise itinerary)
indicates external site which may or may not meet accessibility guidelines
indicates page is not optimized for a mobile device
© Carnival Corporation. All rights reserved. Desktop Site

Sidney Poitier’s 7 Most Memorable Performances
All Harry Potter Movies Ranked Worst to Best by Tomatometer
Five Things To Remember Before You See Black Widow
The Cannes Ketchup: Docs on The Velvet Underground and Val Kilmer Are the Talk of the Town
We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email. Don’t worry, it won’t take long. Please click the link below to receive your verification email.
We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account. Just leave us a message here and we will work on getting you verified.
Please reference “Error Code 2121” when contacting customer service.
2018, Drama/Mystery & thriller, 1h 34m
The 15:17 to Paris pays clumsily well-intentioned tribute to an act of heroism, but by casting the real-life individuals involved, director Clint Eastwood fatally derails his own efforts. Read critic reviews
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
Theater box office or somewhere else
By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
Theater box office or somewhere else
By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
You can always edit your review after.
Verified reviews are considered more trustworthy by fellow moviegoers.
Want to submit changes to your review before closing?
They won't be able to see your review if you only submit your rating.
They won't be able to see your review if you only submit your rating.
Discard changes & exit Submit only my rating Keep writing
The image is an example of a ticket confirmation email that AMC sent you when you purchased your ticket. Your Ticket Confirmation # is located under the header in your email that reads "Your Ticket Reservation Details". Just below that it reads "Ticket Confirmation#:" followed by a 10-digit number. This 10-digit number is your confirmation number.
Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email.
On Aug. 21, 2015, the world watches in stunned silence as the media reports a thwarted terrorist attack on a train that's bound for Paris -- an attempt prevented by three young Americans traveling together through Europe. The heroic and courageous actions of Anthony Sadler, Alek Skarlatos and Spencer Stone help to save the lives of more than 500 passengers on board.
PG-13 (Drug References|Bloody Images|Language|Some Suggestive Material|Violence)
Warner Bros. Pictures, Malpaso Productions, Village Roadshow Pictures
Thomas Lennon
Principal Michael Akers

Julien Pougnier
Supervising Art Direction
It's a really, really unsatisfactory film, which is a shame because the story is quite an extraordinary one.
Clint Eastwood's The 15:17 to Paris takes a taut, engrossing, and surprising nonfiction book-the most complete and genuine account of an act of real-life heroism that enthralled the whole free world-and turns it into a flaccid, bewildering docudrama.
It's the second section that's really dire: a flaccid travelogue in which the boys visit landmark tourist attractions...these scenes bring the film to a grinding halt from which it never recovers.
February 16, 2018 | Rating: 2/5 | Full Review…
It's a heart-pumping 15-minute or so sequence that proves that the old man's still got it, but whether it's worth the wait will depend on your level of patience.
February 15, 2018 | Rating: 1.5/5 | Full Review…
I found this to be one of Clint Eastwood's worst films. I thought the emotion was very fake.
February 15, 2018 | Rating: D | Full Review…
They're all handsome but just appalling actors. This disjuncture is impossible to forget while watching the film, and it's very uncomfortable.
The decision to cast non-actors is hardly a new one, Eastwood's decision was still met with skepticism considering he was casting the actual heroes to recreate their heroics.
September 7, 2020 | Rating: 2.0/4.0 | Full Review…
It's something so detached from humanity, so blind to the world around it. The 15:17 to Paris is Thoughts and Prayers: The Movie.
July 23, 2020 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review…
It's a mixed bag of results, but I'm mildly recommending it for the novelty factor.
That trademark Eastwood lack of sugar coating is what makes its inciting event memorable.
August 19, 2019 | Rating: 3.5/5 | Full Review…
Sad that we never really got to know their three protagonists more than the forced attempt to sell what they did. A big disappointment. [Full Review in Spanish]
For evidence of why narrative filmmaking is generally assisted by the designation of actors who have learned at least some facets of their craft, look no further than Clint Eastwood's egregiously inauthentic experiment.
July 23, 2019 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review…
It's a really, really unsatisfactory film, which is a shame because the story is quite an extraordinary one.
Clint Eastwood's The 15:17 to Paris takes a taut, engrossing, and surprising nonfiction book-the most complete and genuine account of an act of real-life heroism that enthralled the whole free world-and turns it into a flaccid, bewildering docudrama.
It's the second section that's really dire: a flaccid travelogue in which the boys visit landmark tourist attractions...these scenes bring the film to a grinding halt from which it never recovers.
February 16, 2018 | Rating: 2/5 | Full Review…
It's a heart-pumping 15-minute or so sequence that proves that the old man's still got it, but whether it's worth the wait will depend on your level of patience.
February 15, 2018 | Rating: 1.5/5 | Full Review…
The decision to cast non-actors is hardly a new one, Eastwood's decision was still met with skepticism considering he was casting the actual heroes to recreate their heroics.
September 7, 2020 | Rating: 2.0/4.0 | Full Review…
It's something so detached from humanity, so blind to the world around it. The 15:17 to Paris is Thoughts and Prayers: The Movie.
July 23, 2020 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review…
It's a mixed bag of results, but I'm mildly recommending it for the novelty factor.
That trademark Eastwood lack of sugar coating is what makes its inciting event memorable.
August 19, 2019 | Rating: 3.5/5 | Full Review…
Sad that we never really got to know their three protagonists more than the forced attempt to sell what they did. A big disappointment. [Full Review in Spanish]
For evidence of why narrative filmmaking is generally assisted by the designation of actors who have learned at least some facets of their craft, look no further than Clint Eastwood's egregiously inauthentic experiment.
July 23, 2019 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review…
A formless, narratively inert nothing of a movie that often feels like watching someone's home movies of their trip to Europe for an hour and a half.
June 3, 2019 | Rating: 1/4 | Full Review…
A long drawn out film; horrible pacing, awkward editing, and ultimately, a boring experience.
May 9, 2019 | Rating: D+ | Full Review…
A terrible film (if it can be called that) by Clint Eastwood, The 15:17 to Paris tells the real life story of a thwarted 2015 terrorist attack. More of a re-enactment than a film, it follows the lives of three best friends (played by the actual people) leading up to a European vacation in which they encounter an Islamic terrorist intent on carrying out a mass shooting aboard a train to Paris. The storytelling is really piss-poor; there's no real plot, just random episodes of three guy's lives, and it's pretty clear that they don't have much acting talent. The 15:17 to Paris is a poorly made film that fails to find a compelling story behind this extraordinary event of heroism and bravery.
A interesting touch casting the real life heroes in this docu-drama, well written and photographed. Eastwood does a capable job but not his best by any stretch. Worth watching! 06-14-2018
Spencer Stone, Alek Skarlatos, and Anthony Sadler were three ordinary servicemen taking a train ride into Paris when they found themselves in the middle of an armed terrorist attack. The three men rushes into danger, disarmed and subdued the attacker, and treated the injured on the scene. The 15:17 to Paris is a big screen movie directed by Clint Eastwood (American Sniper) that tells their life stories played by the men themselves. It got some of the worst reviews of Eastwood's storied career (mine won't be better). There are two gigantic miscalculations when it comes to 15:17 to Paris: 1) having the real-life subjects play the adult versions of themselves, and 2) that there was enough material here to fill out an engaging, enlightening, fulfilling film experience. I assumed telling this real-life story as a movie was going to be a challenge to produce enough meaningful material to eek out a feature-length running time, and within the first five minutes I knew that I was doomed. We're sitting down to two single moms discussing their boys with their classroom teacher, and that teacher literally says, "If you don't medicate them now they'll just self-medicate later. Statistically, boys of single moms are more likely to have problems." My response: "What the hell, lady?!" This character was obviously engineered, from her very foundation, to be a walking, talking point of exposition and disagreement. No real teacher would ever utter these words so callously. It was this rude awakening that made me realize what a terribly written slog I was in for. At no point were these supporting characters going to come across as authentic human beings. Instead, it's a world populated by robots with bad social skills or unshakable faith played by familiar actors (Judy Greer, Jenna Fischer, Thomas Lennon, Tony Hale, Jaleel White of all people). Also, what little kid has a Full Metal Jacket poster in his bedroom? Did he not understand what that movie was about? These men can rightly serve as an inspiration, rising to the occasion in a true test of courage. No one will challenge the heroism. But what else is there to this story? The attack is presented as the framing device and as it plays out we segue into lengthy flashbacks about their lives leading up to this pivotal point in time. It's just that these three men lived fairly uneventful, normal lives until finding themselves in a unique situation. We don't seem to trace any significant, formative moments. Spending time with them as kids, then teens, and finally as adults doesn't so much provide greater understanding of them as people as it does pad out the running time. We watch them get in trouble twice at school for not having a hall pass. We watch them watch football. We watch them endure training montages. We watch the trio tour the sights of Italy and eat gelato. We watch an Army team retrieve a backpack. We watch Spencer get demoted for not stitching properly. Seriously, this is given time. It's not even until a full hour-plus into the movie before they confront the attack on the train. Chronicling the lives of normal, real-life people under extraordinary circumstances is not by itself a fatal flaw, as evidenced by the masterful and mournful United 93. The power of empathy allows us to leap into a multitude of perspectives. However, with United 93 there was an ongoing story that could unfold because of the scope of events. There were developments, deadly complications, and the slow realization of what was happening, what was going to happen, and what needed to be done. With 15:17 to Paris, the attack is uncomplicated and over relatively quickly. There's a reason Eastwood saves the train attack for the end because it cannot function as a sufficient movie plot on its own. Eastwood had a similar predicament with his previous film chronicling the heroism of the pilot who landed a plane on the Hudson River. The plane crash was thrilling and Tom Hanks added some layers to the portrayal of a man uncomfortable with the spotlight. 15:17 to Paris doesn't even have that much. It's a tedious trek to an all-too swift climax. The other large miscalculation was having the real-life actors portray themselves. These guys just are not actors. I suppose Eastwood felt the real-life figures would best understand the emotions of each scene, in particular the attack, but another approach would be simply teaching actors. The forced verisimilitude feels like a marketing gimmick meant to appeal to a select audience. Making things more difficult is that these guys just aren't that interesting as subjects. Sure there are broad strokes of characterization applied here and there but it's with very minimal effort (see above for some of the just-had-to-include plot moments). This is another reason actors would have been preferable, because these guys' lives don't have to be interesting for my benefit. Their lives were not destined to one day entertain me on the big screen. They can simply be normal people. On the other hand, watching normal people do normal, boring things without a more enriching sense of introspection, personalities, or depth is like being trapped watching someone else's home movies on a loop. Spencer Stone performs the best of his buds but none of them should expect a second career as an in-demand thespian. I feel bad saying this but I really just didn't care, and that's because the movie gave me no reason to do so here. Yes, these three men are heroes and their sense of normality might lend itself toward a larger theme about the everyday capabilities of heroism, but there isn't enough here to make me care beyond the train attack. The screenwriting does not present them as multi-dimensional characters and perhaps that's because of the guys' limitations as actors, exacerbating a spiral that only makes 15:17 to Paris less involving as it chases after the idol of authenticity. Eastwood is known for being an economical filmmaker but it feels like he should have been even more judicious here. The adherence to strictly the facts strips the film of some of its larger emotional power. There's far too much filler and not enough substance to balance out 90-plus minutes. You'll grow restless. If there's a lesson to be learned from The 15:17 to Paris, let it be that every story needs a reason to exist and, when in doubt, trust actors to deliver that story. Nate's Grade: C-
based on true events, and starring the actual people involved. this tale of heroism in the face of terrorism is better than you may think, thanks to the direction of clint eastwood, who doesn't bore us with the usual cliches. i enjoyed it.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.
The percentage of Approved Tomatometer Critics who have given this movie a positive review
The percentage of users who rated this 3.5 stars or higher.
Get the freshest reviews, news, and more delivered right to your inbox!
Join the Newsletter! Join the Newsletter!
Copyright © Fandango. All rights reserved. V3

Mini Pussy Little Teen Foto Video
Sex Bugil Abg Kecil Jepang
Sex Na School
Nude Teen Mate
Fatty S Young Teen Hairy Foto
Adolescence (15-17 years old) | CDC
Teen Parenting Tips (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18-Year-Olds)
Club O2 (Teens 15-17 Years) | Carnival Cruise Line
The 15:17 to Paris (2018) - Rotten Tomatoes
Boy, 15, knifed in stomach and another teen, 17, stabbed ...
PARENTAL OPTIONS FOR OUT-OF-CONTROL 16-YEAR-OLDS
Teenage pregnancy - Wikipedia
Google
15 Young Royals to Know About | Teen Vogue
15 17 Teen