New (15) from $24.99 There is a newer model of this item: Melissa & Doug Sunny Patch Dilly Dally Turtle Target Action Game Melissa & Doug Sunny Patch Tootle Turtle Target Toss Game With 4 Self-Stick Bean BagsDetailsDiggin PopOut Ring Toss FREE Shipping on orders over . DetailsMelissa & Doug Sunny Patch Verdie Chameleon Double-Sided Bean Bag Toss Game With 8 Bean Bags FREE Shipping on orders over . Great for indoor or outdoor use This versatile target-toss game functions on the floor, on the wall, or freestanding and works both indoors and outdoors. Ideal for team or individual play, the cheerful turtle-themed numbered target, which folds easily for storage, includes a sturdy, non-wobbling stand and 4 color-coded self-stick beanbags. Bright, cheerful colors and the inviting design of all Sunny Patch characters inspire children to learn about and appreciate the natural world and all living things. Encourages motor skills, math skills, and more Younger children find tremendous satisfaction in just tossing the beanbags and getting them to stick on the target;
as they grow older and start learning early math skills, they will love aiming for specific numbers and adding up their scores. As they do, they will develop hand-eye coordination, gross motor skills, and interpersonal skills along with counting and math skills. About Melissa & Doug Melissa & Doug toys are designed to fuel imagination, inspire exploration, and encourage the natural curiosity that leads to a lifetime of learning! From classic wooden toys to creative crafts for every age, Melissa & Doug’s timeless products educate and enrich in a way that’s as natural as playtime itself. Since their company’s founding in 1988, Melissa and Doug have been committed to making exceptional children’s products, with a focus on hands-on creative play and superior customer service. With their recognizable red-oval logo, Melissa and Doug put their names on every product they make—a symbol of their commitment to quality, attention to detail, and dedication to improving playtime for families around the world.
Pick a color--red or green--and toss the self-stick beanbags at the turtle-shaped target on the floor, on the wall, or freestanding! A non-wobbling base and a smiling face make this an exciting way to learn simple addition and practice hand-eye coordination, indoors or out. Pick a team--red or green--and take turns tossing your self-stick beanbags at the turtle-shaped target. From classic wooden toys to crafts, pretend play, and games, Melissa & Doug products provide a launch pad to ignite imagination and a sense of wonder in all children so they can discover themselves, their passions, and their purpose. Since the company’s founding more than 25 years ago, Melissa & Doug has consistently delivered innovative products that inspire open-ended thinking, encourage kids to see new possibilities, and offer Countless Ways to Play. It’s part of a bigger vision to Take Back Childhood. Because by giving children a true childhood with the space and freedom to explore their world, we give them a path to realizing their full potential!
22 x 15 x 2 inches 9.3 ounces (View shipping rates and policies) Item can be shipped within U.S. This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More 36 months - 6 years #7,935 in Toys & Games (See Top 100 in Toys & Games) #23 in Toys & Games > Learning & Education > Early Development Toys > Sorting & Stacking #24 in Toys & Games > Baby & Toddler Toys > Stacking & Nesting Toys #157 in Sports & Outdoors > Sports & Fitness > Leisure Sports & Game Room > Outdoor Games & Activities 4.1 out of 5 stars 5 star54%4 star17%3 star15%2 star8%1 star6%See all verified purchase reviewsTop Customer Reviewstoy ok but not as fun as i thought it would be.not worth the moneyCan a toy be *too* durable?this is way smaller than I thought from the picture ...Target gamePerfect for young children!Great little gameI like it because it is portable See and discover other items: 4 year old educational activity booksTarget Target is a popular Minnesota-based big-box corporation.
It is hard to throw a stone in suburbia today without hitting a Target. We have all been to one. With busy stores across the country, Target has an obligation to provide its consumers with a safe shopping experience including well-maintained shopping facilities and carrying safely designed and manufactured products. Target faces a lot of lawsuits. If you are claiming more than $75,000 and you are not in Minnesota, you can expect Target in many cases to remove the case to federal court. Lawyers, if you are bringing a claim, remember that these big retailers have zillions of pages of procedures and they don't train their $8 an hour employees to the point where they know these procedures. One more thing to keep in mind: ask for the surveillance film early in the case. These days, these stores have cameras everywhere. Most of the personal injury lawsuits against Target that have gone to trial are slip and fall cases. In this claim, plaintiffs generally allege that they fell because either (1) Target created a condition that caused them to fall (usually the best facts for plaintiffs), or (2) Target knew or should have known of a hazard that might cause someone to fall and did not do enough (usually nothing) to prevent the hazard.
There are a lot of very high verdicts in slip and fall cases like this. But these cases can sometimes be challenging, too, because a plaintiff's lawyer has to show that the fall was due to the negligence of Target. The mere fact that the person fell is not enough to bring a viable claims. From looking at recorded jury verdicts, it is easy to form the impression that Target looks to settle these cases if there is a real chance of a jury awarding a significant award. If you look at the verdicts in slip and fall cases around the country, you see very few plaintiffs' verdicts. What does this tell you? One interpretation is that Target is a tough competitor in personal injury cases. Another interpretation, and the one we subscribe to, is that Target simply does not let the good cases go to trial. If you read the details of some of these defense verdicts, it is pretty clear why the plaintiff lost. The good cases with Target have a good chance of reaching a settlement and you do see a good number of reported settlements with Target (and attorneys rarely report settlements).
Here are a few of the sample verdict against Target or that happened in one of their stores. These are not, by any stretch, representative verdicts - on way or the other - of what to expect in your potential claim. 2013, Pennsylvania, Jury Verdict of $835,000. Plaintiff, a 52 year old driver delivering rubbish containers tripped and fell over a chunk of cement at a construction site when exiting his vehicle. Plaintiff sues the construction site’s general contractor and a demolition subcontractor working at the site. Plaintiff’s engineer testifies that Plaintiff’s position precluded him from seeing the debris while exiting his vehicle Defendant general contractor disagrees and further claims that it is not responsible for the conditions under which Plaintiff fell as the demolition company was performing that type of work. Jury disagrees and finds the general contractor 90% at fault, with the Plaintiff only 10% comparatively negligent. (Note: this case happened in a Target; the jury found the general contractor liable.)
2012, Florida: Jury Verdict of $386,522. Plaintiff is shopping at Target in Deerfield Beach, Florida. She slips and falls in a puddle of bleach and sustained a C5-6 disc injury. She gets surgery, a diskectomy (no fusion) She sues Target. Jury awards $386,522 and finds Target 87% at fault and her 13% at fault. The adjusted verdict was $336,274.2011, Florida: Jury Verdict of $230,802. A 48-year-old man slips on liquid soap in a Target near St. Petersburg. He claimed a torn meniscus in both of his knees. At trial, plaintiff argues that one of Target's employees spilled liquid soap on the floor and failed to clean it up or warn of the potential risk of fall. (Again, these "Target employees created the risk" are the best kind of slip and fall cases.) Target argues what stores always argue: plaintiff should have seen the spill. Target also argues, through its orthopedic expert, that plaintiff's damages were not as he claims because while that kind of fall can lead to a crush injury, it should not cause that type of harm to the knees' meniscus.
The jury disagrees, awarding plaintiff $230,801.92. The jury also finds plaintiff 10% responsible, reducing the award under Florida's comparative negligence law to 10% to $207,721.73.2011, Pennsylvania: Jury Verdict of $150,000. Plaintiff, a 25 year old female is walking through an isle carrying a large box when she steps sideways to allow an older lady to pass. The edge of her box catches on a display shelf, and she trips over a bean bag chair that was left in the isle. Plaintiff is diagnosed with chondromalacia of both knees with a recommendation of future surgery. Defendant claims she should have seen the chair when she went to pick up the box and also that they had no way of knowing who placed the chair or how long it had been there. The Jury finds the Defendant 90% at fault and the Plaintiff 10% comparatively negligent. Plaintiff is awarded $150,000 that is reduced accordingly. Here are some examples of the types of lawsuits that have been filed against Target: Excessive force from employees or securityNegligent securityInjures involving Target's cart lifts (vermaport) Our law firm is handling Target injury cases.