08614 Brickmaster LEGO Legends of Chima : The Quest for ChiThe requested URL /?p=13529 was not found on this server.A reform of the British Army will see the Windsor-based Household Cavalry relocated. The regiment has been based at Combermere Barracks, in St Leonards Road, since the early 1800s. Soldiers will be moved to Bulford Camp in Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, making up part of a new strike brigade. The regiment will be replaced by the Welsh Guards. The changes were announced in a written statement from defence secretary Michael Fallon on Thursday, December 15 and will come into force in 2019. Strike brigades were first announced in the Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 and will be based around new AJAX armoured vehicles. Since the announcement, a petition has been started, calling for the Household Cavalry to be kept in Windsor. Started anonymously it states: “My husband joined the Household Cavalry regiment because it didn’t move around, and because it is based in Windsor.
“Local men and women have joined this regiment because they are based near family and friends.” The petition, which is addressed to Prince William, Prince Harry, the Queen and the defence secretary, has already gathered more than 600 signatures and states the upheaval for hundreds of families is ‘unfair’. “As far as the army are concerned my husband is a number and his family is a bolt on, an inconvenience,” the petition adds. “No one in government cares how this will affect any of us, why would they?” Ward councillor for Combermere Barracks, Cllr Eileen Quick (Con, Clewer East), who is Windsor ‘born and bred’ said she is ‘absolutely shocked’ at the decision. “They are a part of Windsor and I think local residents are so used to them being here, it is something that would be very sad to lose,” she told the Express. We have the House of Windsor here who consider Windsor Castle their main home and the Household Cavalry are strongly linked to the royals.”
Regarding the petition she added: “I don’t know whether it will make a difference but I think it is very good to put a mark in the sand to show how much people value the Household Cavalry here.” Her thoughts were echoed by Cllr Jack Rankin (Con, Castle Without) who said he is hoping to bring the matter up at the next full council meeting and encouraged ‘Windsorians’ to sign the petition. Many army families from the Household Cavalry live on the Broom Farm Estate in Dedworth. Ward councillor for the area Cllr Ed Wilson (Con, Clewer South) said: “From our point of view it is going to be a great shame to lose the Household Cavalry. “A lot of people in Windsor have a great attachment to the regiment. “We will be sorry to see them go but we will welcome the Welsh Guards to West Windsor.” The Ministry of Defence did not wish to comment further on the plans or petition. Create an account to continue reading. Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articlesFor unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below
Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles Sign in to continue Already have an account? What's my subscriber number? Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page Don't have an account? Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or Please check your email If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password. If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder. It's time to subscribe. You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month. Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week Subscribe now for unlimited access
Link my existing subscriptionSimply give us your subscriber number to continue Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email. Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site. If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation. You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'. If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.
There aren’t many toy companies that could make headlines in the business press merely by expanding their London offices — ‘Lego blocks out Brexit concerns’ — but Lego is not like other toy companies. Last week it was named the world’s most powerful brand by the consultancy Brand Finance; this week the second Lego movie is opening in cinemas; the University of Cambridge will shortly be appointing its first Lego professor of play. For a company that, a decade ago, was losing $1 million a day, this is a remarkable reconstruction. But Lego has spent those ten years regaining ‘belief in the brick’, according to its new British chief executive, Bali Padda: moving away from the instant gratification of computer-game-influenced, dumbed-down sets where most of the assembly work was done before the box was opened, and back to the basic bricks that are the reason Lego is loved by children. And, just as much, by parents. Apart from the fact that these are toys that we all played with (and current sets are still compatible with the ones we used), they seem more wholesome than other toys.
One of Lego’s senior directors refers to them — in a phrase which they’re not quite brave enough to use as an advertising slogan — as ‘toys with vitamins in’. They develop motor skills and patience. They teach children to follow a plan, or, more importantly, to not follow a plan. They allow children to be creative without paint on furniture or glitter up nostrils. There’s no more room on the fridge, but throwing a painting away seems heartless; a Lego house can be admired, safe in the knowledge that it will soon be cannibalised to make a fire station. Even Lego’s efficacy as a caltrop (a word which, since mechanised cavalry made military caltrops obsolete, seems now to be used only in relation to Lego bricks and British three-pin plugs) is actually a point in its favour: there aren’t many toys that have come out the better of an encounter with my foot. Besides which, Lego have recently developed an extra-padded slipper to protect adult feet from stray bricks — of course they have.
But Lego is not immune to controversy. When the research it undertook as part of its back-to-bricks reinvention showed that over 90 per cent of its products worldwide were bought for boys, it decided to introduce products that appealed to girls. The first was Lego Friends, with bricks in pinks and pastels and figures moulded to look like women rather than the block-like yellow man with his block-like haircut. ‘Let’s be honest,’ Lego’s Mads Nipper said, ‘Girls hate him.’ And girls did seem to respond to figures that did not resemble Michael Fabricant with jaundice: after six months, sales were up 24 per cent. At the same time, the backlash started: pink Lego was ‘ghettoising’ girls, telling them that real Lego was not for them; comparisons were made between today’s gendered branding and advertisements from the 1970s showing cheeky tomboyish girls building exciting constructions from bricks in primary colours. If Lego wanted to get girls interested again, it was argued, they should make more female figures engaged in construction work or interplanetary travel rather than in the salons and swimming pools of Lego Friends.
To be fair, Lego was doing this as well: its Research Institute kit, introduced in 2014, features a female chemist, astronomer and palaeontologist, and has been enthusiastically adopted by real female scientists. (One of my favourite Twitter accounts, @-legoacademics, features nothing but inspiring pictures of these figures doing the exciting work of an academic — mainly making funding applications and listening to undergraduates’ personal problems.) It is not surprising that female scientists are keen for girls to play with Lego. Studies have shown that they can build cognitive skills as well as caltrops, and that the gender gap in spatial skills, for example, is virtually eliminated if girls play with Lego (and similar toys) as much as boys do. The fact that items like Lego came to be considered ‘boys’ toys’ is one reasons why young women are not making the impact they should in science and technology, which rely on these skills. As such, the campaign against pink Lego was the worst form of counterproductive virtue-signalling: demanding what sounds like equality at the expense of actually improving women’s life chances.
In an ideal world, girls and boys would play equally with Lego in nice primary colours; but what do you do if your daughter comes home from nursery saying she has decided that she can’t play with Lego because it’s a boy’s toy? Do you say, ‘Here’s a copy of Cordelia Fine’s Delusions of Gender — I’d like you to read it, paying particular attention to her remarks on neuroplasticity’? Or do you say, ‘Look! This Lego is pink!’? As Lise Eliot, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Chicago’s Rosalind Franklin University, puts it, ‘If it takes colour-coding or ponies and hairdressers to get girls playing with Lego, I’ll put up with it, at least for now, because it’s just so good for little girls’ brains.’ Lego is a toy we want our children to love. And that’s why many middle-class parents, despite insisting that their children should only watch CBeebies so they are not exposed to commercials, will willingly take them to the Lego movie. Andrew Watts is a stand- up comic.