Freedom
π΅ππππππ πΈππππππ βͺπFree Speech
β Kerala has promulgated a draconian ordinance to curtail free speech.
β The ordinance amends Section 118A in the Kerala Police Act giving uncontrolled powers to the police to curtail free speech.
β Now, the police can arrest anyone expressing or disseminating any matter deemed threatening, abusive,humiliating or defamatory to a person or a class of persons in any manner making it an cognizable offence.
β The new law is vaguely defined and is made cognizable whereas criminal defamation under the IPC is non-
cognisable.
β Section 118A lays down a three-year prison term whereas it is two year term under the IPC.
β The present ordinance contravenes with earlier Supreme Court judgement -A police officer cannot register an FIR for the offence & they can only be prosecuted by a private complaint.
β However, Centreβs assent is mandatory as it is in conflict with central laws & the ordinance itself required prior presidential assent.
β It is regrettable that the State sought to equip with extraordinary powers to deal with a problem that can be dealt with other provisions relating to stalking, harassment, criminal intimidation and verbal abuse.
β State Governmentβs Arguments - It indicates that law targets only defamatory social media posts.
β It will not curb reportage, political satire or expression of opinion.
β However, in the Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015) case, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act which criminalised sending of any message through a computer resource that was grossly
offensive, menacing, or caused annoyance, inconvenience, danger, insult, injury and intimidation.
β The court cited that act brought innocent and offensive messaging under its ambit.