chomsky
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,996
Q: Hi. First, thank you so much for coming. I've learned a lot listening to what you shared with us
2
00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:09,320
My question is specifically about Iran and the nuclear weapons
3
00:00:09,520 --> 00:00:14,240
and the discussion that you were having with regard to Iran in the international community
4
00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:18,180
I definitely understand the idea of a country obtaining a nuclear weapon or developing one themselves out of a form of protection or to be on the same, I guess, international status as other countries who are considered superpowers or on the same level as a superpower because they themselves have nuclear weapons But what do you do when a country is openly trying to develop one or obtain one
9
00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:43,280
and also openly threatening to wipe out a country and claiming that a country shouldn't exist
10
00:00:43,289 --> 00:00:46,960
I mean those are two really big issues that we're dealing with and
11
00:00:47,100 --> 00:00:49,760
I didn't really think you addressed that and I was curious what you had to say.
12
00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:54,000
Chomsky: That's true. What do you do about countries that already developed nuclear weapons
13
00:00:54,180 --> 00:00:57,780
outside the framework of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and are daily
14
00:00:58,180 --> 00:01:03,500
violating resolutions of the Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency?
15
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,380
That's the much more serious problem
16
00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:12,580
Q: That's a different situation because those countries aren't openly threatening to wipe out another country.
17
00:01:12,580 --> 00:01:13,800
Chomsky: Nor is Iran.
18
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:18,720
Just take a look at the statements. The statements are that they don't think -- they said --
19
00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:23,580
Actually goes back to Khomeini at the time of
20
00:01:23,580 --> 00:01:28,840
the Israeli-Iranian alliance and Israel didn't care about it then
21
00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:37,440
And it keeps being repeated. This statement is that, you know, in the course of time, Israel should no longer exist
22
00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,020
Well, actually I happen to agree with that too.
23
00:01:40,020 --> 00:01:44,460
In fact, so do a lot of people in Israel, the ones who think there should be a single democratic state.
24
00:01:44,460 --> 00:01:47,020
That's not calling for wiping anyone out
25
00:01:47,160 --> 00:01:54,640
In fact, Iran has supported the International consensus on the two-state settlement
26
00:01:54,820 --> 00:02:02,300
Actually, there are two countries that are not only calling for some nation not to exist but are destroying it
27
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:04,680
Namely, the US and Israel
28
00:02:04,740 --> 00:02:09,380
That's their position with regard to the Palestinians, and they're not just saying it
29
00:02:09,740 --> 00:02:18,000
[Applause]
30
00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:22,540
I stress: they're not just saying it, they're doing it day by day
31
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:29,020
That's the meaning of the policies that are going on right before our eyes in Gaza and the West Bank
32
00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:32,360
which we are supporting and paying for.
33
00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:35,420
So sure, you shouldn't call for the destruction of
34
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:38,640
another nation, and you shouldn't implement that
35
00:02:38,780 --> 00:02:42,560
Actually, the official position of Israel, backed by the United States -
36
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:47,980
they've slightly modified it - but back about 20 years ago their official position -
37
00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:54,180
the coalition government - Labour, Likud - was that "there cannot be," I'm quoting it,
38
00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:59,100
"an additional Palestinian state between Jordan and Israel."
39
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:06,060
In other words, they declared, and the US supported that, there already is a Palestinian state, namely Jordan.
40
00:03:06,060 --> 00:03:08,240
And the Palestinians object, you know,
41
00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:11,620
They say, "no, wait a minute, that's not our state," but who cares about them
42
00:03:11,800 --> 00:03:16,020
We say that's your state and there can't be an additional one
43
00:03:16,020 --> 00:03:19,820
Well, that goes well beyond calling for the destruction of another country.
44
00:03:19,820 --> 00:03:24,360
I mean it's - it's analogous to saying that if somebody came along,
45
00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:29,740
suppose Ahmadinejad said the Jews don't need Israel because they already have New York
46
00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:37,520
Okay. I mean, you know, we'd call that a revival of Nazism, but that's the official -- has been the official
47
00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:42,540
US-Israeli position. So there's a lot to be -- Incidentally about Iran,
48
00:03:42,780 --> 00:03:48,620
nobody in their right mind wants Iran to have nuclear weapons, or anyone else, but it is well --
49
00:03:48,620 --> 00:03:53,460
-- and it's a horrible regime undoubtedly, though there are worse ones in the region which are our allies --
50
00:03:54,060 --> 00:03:59,400
But everyone, I'm not referring to Israel, I'm referring to the other Arab state
51
00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:04,800
In comparison with Saudi Arabia, Iran looks like a civil rights paradise -- but the
52
00:04:05,340 --> 00:04:08,380
But it's awful. You know no doubt
53
00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:13,660
And there's a way to deal with it. Like, for example, moving towards a nuclear weapons-free zone
54
00:04:13,840 --> 00:04:19,460
But among strategic analysts, including Israeli ones, there is no real
55
00:04:21,540 --> 00:04:28,500
There's no real question about why Iran is moving to nuclear weapons capability,
56
00:04:28,500 --> 00:04:31,760
which is not the same as having nuclear weapons -
57
00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:38,820
it's just being at a point where you could have them, like most of the advanced industrial world is in that position
58
00:04:39,460 --> 00:04:43,220
Japan, Italy all sorts of countries -
59
00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:47,000
The reason is very simple. Actually, it was described by
60
00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,320
one of Israel's leading
61
00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:52,160
military analysts, very hawkish
62
00:04:52,740 --> 00:04:57,180
Martin van Creveld a couple of years ago. After the invasion of Iraq,
63
00:04:57,420 --> 00:05:03,520
he wrote an article in which he said he doesn't know if Iran is developing nuclear weapons, and he hopes not
64
00:05:03,780 --> 00:05:07,740
But he says if they're not developing nuclear weapons, they are crazy
65
00:05:08,140 --> 00:05:12,620
That was his word. If they're not developing, they're crazy. The United States has just announced
66
00:05:13,150 --> 00:05:17,500
"we're going to attack anybody we feel like and invade you if we can do it with impunity.
67
00:05:17,500 --> 00:05:19,620
so you better have a deterrent"
68
00:05:20,380 --> 00:05:22,030
well
69
00:05:22,030 --> 00:05:24,440
Maybe they're developing a deterrent.
70
00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,920
No serious analyst thinks that they would use nuclear weapons
71
00:05:28,060 --> 00:05:33,420
if Iran had nuclear weapons and missiles, which nobody sane wants them to have,
72
00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:39,160
I mean, if they went as far as even loading a missile, the country would be vaporized
73
00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:42,320
You know instantly, even if there was any suspicion of it.
74
00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:47,720
Well, you know, the clerics may be hideous people, but they've shown no
75
00:05:47,740 --> 00:05:54,460
particular inclination for suicide and destruction of everything that they own and everything they value
76
00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:59,320
The same is true about leaking nuclear weapons to others.
77
00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:04,720
If there was any suspicion that they were doing that, you can say goodbye to Iran.
78
00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:12,020
The chances they're using it are probably at the level of an asteroid hitting the earth or something like that
79
00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:19,000
It's a serious problem. In fact if you look at the Israeli literature, they're pretty straight about it.
80
00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:27,980
They say that the real threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon is not against Israel, but it's against Zionism
81
00:06:28,260 --> 00:06:35,200
That is what they're afraid of, is that if the region becomes too dangerous,
82
00:06:35,460 --> 00:06:38,240
people in Israel are just gonna leave
83
00:06:38,500 --> 00:06:42,920
people who have the capacity to, more educated, wealthier, and so on
84
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:46,540
because they won't want to live in a region with that threat.
85
00:06:46,540 --> 00:06:49,400
And in fact emigration is a pretty serious problem
86
00:06:49,860 --> 00:06:55,160
emigration of the educated and the trained,
87
00:06:55,420 --> 00:06:58,780
educated sectors, so they don't want to face that threat
88
00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:04,410
But I don't think any serious strategic analyst, at least I've never seen one, who
89
00:07:05,220 --> 00:07:10,220
thinks that this threat that Iran might use a nuclear weapon
90
00:07:10,220 --> 00:00:00,000
If they do it, total suicide