Welcome to the Bloom softball team wall. The most current information will appear at the top of the wall dating back to prior seasons. Utilize the left navigation tools to find past seasons, game schedules, rosters and more. Best of luck this spring!Video: Softball HR knocks fan from seatNews - Published on 6/3/2016 4:00 PMPearl City's Tyra Clark sends fan in chair head over heels. Read Article Get NotifiedPosted Fri, Jun 3 2016Report Final Score - Bloom vs. ThornwoodPlayed on 5/21/2016 11:00 AMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Please help us by reporting the final score. Report Final ScorePosted Sat, May 21 2016Report Final Score - Bloom @ Crete-MoneePlayed on 5/19/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Thu, May 19 2016Report Final Score - Bloom @ Rich SouthPlayed on 5/17/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Tue, May 17 2016Report Final Score - Bloom vs. ReavisPlayed on 5/13/2016 7:00 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game.
Report Final ScorePosted Fri, May 13 2016Report Final Score - Bloom vs. ReavisPlayed on 5/13/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Fri, May 13 2016Report Final Score - Bloom vs. Richland CountyPlayed on 5/12/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Thu, May 12 2016Report Final Score - Bloom @ Rich CentralPlayed on 5/10/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Tue, May 10 2016Report Final Score - Bloom vs. KankakeePlayed on 5/9/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Mon, May 9 2016Report Final Score - Bloom @ ThornridgePlayed on 5/4/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Wed, May 4 2016Video: Top 5 plays of AprilNews - Published on 5/4/2016 4:00 PMA pair of unique softball plays, a barehanded baseball catch, a football kick and basketball dunk make up a short but sweet top plays of April.
Read Article Get NotifiedPosted Wed, May 4 2016Softball team steals 40 bases in 29-28 winNews - Published on 5/3/2016 1:45 PMMarathon game between Peoria and Manual includes 40 stolen bases, 40 walks and 57 runs. Read Article Get NotifiedPosted Tue, May 3 2016Report Final Score - Bloom vs. Richland CountyPlayed on 5/2/2016 4:30 PMA final score has not been reported for this softball game. Report Final ScorePosted Mon, May 2 2016by Patricia Armstrong, Assistant Director, Center for TeachingThe Original Taxonomy | The Revised Taxonomy | Why Use Bloom’s Taxonomy? | The above graphic is released under a Creative Commons Attribution license. You’re free to share, reproduce, or otherwise use it, as long as you attribute it to the Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. For a higher resolution version, visit our Flickr account and look for the “Download this photo” icon. In 1956, Benjamin Bloom with collaborators Max Englehart, Edward Furst, Walter Hill, and David Krathwohl published a framework for categorizing educational goals: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Familiarly known as Bloom’s Taxonomy, this framework has been applied by generations of K-12 teachers and college instructors in their teaching. The framework elaborated by Bloom and his collaborators consisted of six major categories: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. The categories after Knowledge were presented as “skills and abilities,” with the understanding that knowledge was the necessary precondition for putting these skills and abilities into practice. While each category contained subcategories, all lying along a continuum from simple to complex and concrete to abstract, the taxonomy is popularly remembered according to the six main categories. Here are the authors’ brief explanations of these main categories in from the appendix of Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Handbook One, pp. 201-207): The 1984 edition of Handbook One is available in the CFT Library in Calhoun 116. See itsACORN record for call number and availability.
While many explanations of Bloom’s Taxonomy and examples of its applications are readily available on the Internet, this guide to Bloom’s Taxonomy is particularly useful because it contains links to dozens of other web sites. Barbara Gross Davis, in the “Asking Questions” chapter of Tools for Teaching, also provides examples of questions corresponding to the six categories. This chapter is not available in the online version of the book, but Tools for Teaching is available in the CFT Library. A group of cognitive psychologists, curriculum theorists and instructional researchers, and testing and assessment specialists published in 2001 a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy with the title A Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. This title draws attention away from the somewhat static notion of “educational objectives” (in Bloom’s original title) and points to a more dynamic conception of classification. The authors of the revised taxonomy underscore this dynamism, using verbs and gerunds to label their categories and subcategories (rather than the nouns of the original taxonomy).
These “action words” describe the cognitive processes by which thinkers encounter and work with knowledge: In the revised taxonomy, knowledge is at the basis of these six cognitive processes, but its authors created a separate taxonomy of the types of knowledge used in cognition: Mary Forehand from the University of Georgia provides a guide to the revised version giving a brief summary of the revised taxonomy and a helpful table of the six cognitive processes and four types of knowledge. The authors of the revised taxonomy suggest a multi-layered answer to this question, to which the author of this teaching guide has added some clarifying points: Citations are from A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Section III of A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, entitled “The Taxonomy in Use,” provides over 150 pages of examples of applications of the taxonomy.