The Thunderbirds Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd

The Thunderbirds Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd

marynat




The Thunderbirds Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd

http://urllio.com/r07fn






















The year is 2010. Teenager Alan Tracy, sent off to a distant boarding school, is the youngest of the sons of Jeff Tracy, a retired American astronaut. Jeff, a widower, has formed International Rescue, and raised his sons to act as a secret, volunteer organization which uses highly advanced technology to save lives worldwide. Jeff and his older sons John, Virgil, Scott, and Gordon, who like Alan were named after the Mercury Seven astronauts are joined in this effort by Lady Penelope and her butler/chauffeur Parker. Their futuristic hardware is largely developed by a genius scientist known as Brains, who lives at the International Rescue base on Tracy Island, somewhere in the Pacific.
When The Hood finds and invades International Rescue's secret base and traps most of the Tracy family, only young Alan Tracy and his friends can save the day.
Back in the mid 60&#39;s, British sci-fi buff Gerry Anderson (also famous for &#39;Space: 1999&#39;) came up with a concept for a futuristic TV show called &#39;The Thunderbirds.&#39; The show was one of a bumper crop of very imaginative television shows which debuted during that time, and was noted for two things: first, the show used marionettes instead of human actors, complete with strings and all (Supermarionation!) Second, the sets were all highly detailed scale models, including some fantastic aircraft, ships and spacecraft. The icing on the cake was outstanding theme music and high-powered opening credits that made &#39;The Thunderbirds&#39; one of the most unlikely cult classics to ever come out of the U.K. Though obviously a show targeted at children, it&#39;s imagination and intelligence made it popular with older folks as well. <br/><br/>It&#39;s now nearly forty years since Anderson&#39;s television series debuted, and we come to find out that Hollywood, which cannot help but ruining anything that was good from the 60&#39;s, has now decided to disembowel &#39;The Thunderbirds.&#39; By all accounts, they have succeeded beyond anyone&#39;s wildest expectations.<br/><br/>In the movie version of the Thunderbirds, Jeff Tracy (Bill Paxton) and &#39;Brains&#39; (Anthony Edwards) have teenage children: Alan (Brady Corbet) and Fermat (Soren Fulton). A character that was a beautiful young Asian woman in the TV series, Tintin, has been reduced to a teenager in the film (Venessa Anne Hudgens). For some reason the producers did not think that kids now-a-days could relate to the TV show&#39;s all-adult cast, so the entire focus of the film revolves around these three youngsters. <br/><br/>A villain introduced in the first episode of the TV series, &#39;Hood,&#39; (Ben Kingsley) now has his own submarine, and has decided that he&#39;s going to take over Tracy&#39;s &#39;secret&#39; Pacific island and commandeer the Thunderbirds for his own use. He disables Thunderbird 5 (the space station), using a missile launched from his submarine. The Tracy family then all rush to Thunderbird 3 (the rocket ship), and launch a rescue mission to save one of their own. But once Thunderbird 3 docks with the damaged space station, Hood takes control from Tracy Island, and keeps all the Tracy&#39;s locked up in outer space, by overriding all their controls, of course. And--you guessed it--the teenage Alan Tracy, home on spring break, is the only one who can save his dad and brothers from Hood&#39;s evil scheme, with the help of Tintin and Fermat. Later on, &#39;secret agent&#39; Lady Penelope (Sophia Myles) and her chauffeur &#39;Parker&#39; (Ron Cook) will also come to help rescue their friends.<br/><br/>A simple plot, but one very poorly done. The heart and sole of the Thunderbirds, Jeff Tracy and his sons, are locked up in the space station for most of the movie, leaving us to be entertained by the boy-band reject Alan and Ben Kingsley&#39;s imitation of a puppet. Big mistake. <br/><br/>The movie has absolutely NONE of the charm, intelligence or imagination of the original TV series-not that there was much there to begin with. The acting makes the original marionettes look like the Royal Shakespeare Company, and the writing and directing wouldn&#39;t pass muster for a Saturday morning cartoon. <br/><br/>Even worst, the creators of this film decided to introduce a healthy dose of slapstick into the feature-perhaps some of the worst, most cliché, stupid slapstick to ever be displayed on the silver screen. The TV series, while having some funny moments, relied mostly on the typical dry British sense of humor, but never-ever did anything remotely resemble the slap-stick idiocy that proliferates &#39;The Thunderbirds&#39; movie. Note to director Frakes: when using slapstick, at least make sure its funny.<br/><br/>But the director certainly pays attention to detail--when he wants to--as is evidenced in a scene where Lady Penelope, Parker, and the teenagers are all locked into a freezer. As one would expect in a cold environment, Lady Penelope&#39;s nipples stand to full attention for everyone to see. As if that did not attract enough attention to her breasts, she then takes a support wire out of her bra for use to pick the lock of the freezer, while proudly telling the captives that she didn&#39;t require the support anyway. Not to be outdone, Tintin gets to show off her erect nipples during a scene where she jumps off of Thunderbird 2. Certainly can&#39;t have a proper kid&#39;s film without shots of erect nipples from the female cast members.<br/><br/>Much attention is paid to other useless details as well, like that given to the Ford logo that appears about every thirty seconds. Even Lady Penelope&#39;s famous pink, six-wheeled, very British Rolls Royce from the TV series has been replaced by a pink, six-wheeled Ford Thunderbird. (It&#39;s a Thunderbird! Get it?) I saw more of the Ford logo in this film than I did passing the local Ford dealer on the way to the cinema. It was surprising that the Thunderbirds did not display the famous blue oval as well…it would have looked good on the bright red paint of Thunderbird 3.<br/><br/>But worst of all is the idiotic patronizing, condescending, moralizing of the script. The typical &#39;kids are people too&#39; message is plastered in our faces as if this were the newest revelation from Mount Sinai. Here we have children who are expertly handling multi-million dollar aircraft that would make the Space Shuttle look like the Wright Flyer. Sure, why not let kids--who don&#39;t even have a driver&#39;s license--handle large, complex, dangerous machinery? Makes sense to me….<br/><br/>If there&#39;s one thing that&#39;s good about this film, it would be that it makes the original 60&#39;s television show look like Masterpiece Theatre in comparison. Otherwise, this is a movie that should never have been made.<br/><br/>My rating: 0 out of 10.
Forget the rest, all those turkeys you&#39;ve seen throughout the years.<br/><br/>This beats them into a cocked hat.<br/><br/>I didn&#39;t think it was possible to take a well established, interesting series like Thunderbirds and make such a complete pigs ear of it. Good old Hollywood! The Hood attacks T5 to draw the Tracey family to it&#39;s rescue, only to be trapped. This leaves only Alan (the youngest, still at school) to join with TinTin and Brain&#39;s Son to rescue the family and thwart The Hood.<br/><br/>Reasonable storyline that is so badly acted it&#39;s unbelievable. The old Supermarionation puppets had more feeling. The script is dire, and so clichéd as to have you cringing half way through.<br/><br/>You really don&#39;t care about ANY of the characters. In fact, we were hoping T5 would blow up and the rest of the cast would freeze to death in their freezer prison just to finish the film early.<br/><br/>Thunderbirds has nothing at all to recommend it and plenty to make you not bother even renting the DVD. It&#39;s terrible and I only hope that any idea of making a follow up are shelved immediately.
Kids are most likely to be entertained by this live-action offering, although baby-boomer fans of the series will appreciate how closely it hews to the show's foundation.
According to publicity material, the film is set in 2020, six years before the first episode of the series. This may appear not to be canon to the TV series, and in fact isn&#39;t, but this is not a fault of the filmmakers. In the Christmas episode &quot;Give or Take a Million&quot;, we see a calendar with the year 2026. It has since been stated that this year was a mistake by the propmaker and should have been 2065, the year that Gerry Anderson wanted the series to be set in, and is generally accepted to be the case. But where Alan Tracy is 21 in the series, in the film he is 15, so the year corresponds correctly. Yes, there are quite a few:<br/><br/>Characters&#39; ages: Many of the characters are younger in the film than in the show. As this film is supposedly set six years before the series&#39; pilot (ignoring the fact that the episode features International Rescue&#39;s first mission) then this is feasible. However this is not applied to everyone; Lady Penelope and Parker are clearly around the ages given to them in the show (27 and 55, respectively) and Brains is also older - although that may because of another change; he&#39;s a father!<br/><br/>New characters: Yes, Brains has a son in the film, Fermat. Along with Onaha, wife of Jeff Tracy&#39;s manservant Kyrano, these two characters were created specifically for the film, as were The Hood&#39;s associates, Transom and Mullion.<br/><br/>Pilots: Jeff Tracy is seen flying Thunderbird 2 at the beginning of the film, with Virgil seemingly his co-pilot. Virgil is never seen flying her solo. The most obvious change is that Gordon Tracy is shown here to be the pilot of space rocket Thunderbird 3. In the series he was the aquanaut in charge of submarine Thunderbird 4, a role apparently given to Alan at the end of the film, going by the yellow colour-coding of his International Rescue uniform. <br/><br/>The Hood: Sir Ben Kingsley&#39;s character actually calls himself by this name in the film, as well as being referred to as The Hood by other characters. The Hood was never mentioned by name in the TV series, only in other media such as comics and publicity material.<br/><br/>FAB 1: Lady Penelope&#39;s famous pink Rolls Royce limousine of the TV show becomes a modified Ford Thunderbird car in the film. This is due to BMW, holders of the Rolls Royce marque, refusing to allow the filmmakers to use it. The new version does bear some trademarks of its TV counterpart, such as the glass canopy, six-wheel drive, and &quot;special features&quot; - although the version in the series did not fly...<br/><br/>Tin-Tin&#39;s powers: Unlike the TV series, in the film Tin-tin is shown to possess and use the same telekinetic/mind control powers as her uncle, The Hood.<br/><br/>Uniforms: International Rescue uniforms are completely different in the film than the TV series, although they are colour-coded like those in the show. Also, there are no hats, although an ice cream seller (a cameo by the film&#39;s visual effects supervisor, Mark Nelmes) can be briefly seen to be wearing a white version of the original TV series hat in the sequence where Thunderbird 2 lands in London. Jonathan Frakes confirms in the DVD commentary that this was a deliberate reference.<br/><br/> This footage was originally part of the sequence in the film where FAB1 approaches Tracy Island by sea. This scene originally concluded with The Hood firing a missile and destroying the car, forcing Lady Penelope and Parker to make the rest of the journey in the pedalo, but this was cut, and the pedalo footage moved to the end of the film. Simple answer: because Ford paid a lot of money for them to be there! The company struck a product placement deal with the filmmakers, which included Lady Penelope&#39;s car, FAB 1, being a modified Ford Thunderbird as opposed to the original series&#39; Rolls Royce, though this was as much the fault of the marque holder, BMW, not allowing it to be used. The placement of Ford vehicles throughout the film is so blatant and almost absurdly extensive that director Jonathan Frakes even suggests on his DVD commentary that it is detrimental to the film as a whole. He has a point. a5c7b9f00b

Report Page