The Patriot Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd 720p

The Patriot Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd 720p

fayrlsilen




The Patriot Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Hd 720p

http://urllio.com/r1x1r






















It is 1776 in colonial South Carolina. Benjamin Martin, a French-Indian war hero who is haunted by his past, now wants nothing more than to live peacefully on his small plantation, and wants no part of a war with the most powerful nation in the world, Great Britain. Meanwhile, his two eldest sons, Gabriel and Thomas, can't wait to enlist in the newly formed "Continental Army." When South Carolina decides to join the rebellion against England, Gabriel immediately signs up to fight...without his father's permission. But when Colonel William Tavington, British dragoon, infamous for his brutal tactics, comes and burns the Martin Plantation to the ground, tragedy strikes. Benjamin quickly finds himself torn between protecting his family, and seeking revenge along with being a part of the birth of a new, young, and ambitious nation.
After proving himself on the field of battle in the French and Indian War, Benjamin Martin wants nothing more to do with such things, preferring the simple life of a farmer. But when his son Gabriel enlists in the army to defend their new nation, America, against the British, Benjamin reluctantly returns to his old life to protect his son, now serving under his command, and his family from British tyranny.
The Patriot is a good movie, but a bad historical analysis.<br/><br/>Mel Gibson as Benjamin Martin is not the most believable character, and neither are the rest, for that matter, but the movie works nonetheless.<br/><br/>Historically, however, this is a disaster.<br/><br/>* The American in the Dragoon regiment... Dragoons were nearly all aristocrats themselves. A colonial would be as unlikely to be found in a Dragoon regiment as King George himself.<br/><br/>* Martin&#39;s singlehanded annihilation of a platoon of Redcoats in the forest, with a collection of muskets and a tomahawk. The muskets may well have been Pennsylvania Rifles, and as such quite accurate, contrary to what many say, but with a re-loading time of more than a minute for an excellent marksman, something Martin&#39;s children were unlikely to be.<br/><br/>* Zee French Colonel waz too very much zee ster-ee-otypical Frenchman. Vive la France! * Apparently artillery in the 1700s was merely to blow holes in the ground with shells. Surprising, since 80% of the rounds fired by the British field artillery before 1800 were iron balls, and they were, contrary to this movie, fired AT the enemy, not at the ground in front of them.<br/><br/>* The pistols used frequently by a number of characters would, in reality, not have any chance of a hit past a range of about 20 feet. Not only were pistols smoothbore, they had an impossibly short barrel, and the image of the British Dragoon Colonel taking careful aim, barrel resting on his arm, sniping a fleeing militiaman is purely Hollywood.<br/><br/>I won&#39;t mention the Nazi-like atrocities committed by the would-be Gentlemen of the Dragoons.<br/><br/>Steele
I just watched this movie and I have to rank it up there in the greatest war movies ever. The movie was just as action packed as Braveheart and other but this movie provided a lot of comic lines. These helped ease some of the tension this movie caused. This is the kind of movie that even though you know the end(America wins the war). You are still spellbound by the action. the battle scenes are truly amazing. But in my opinion the best part of this movie is the patriotism it inspires. This is the kind of movie that makes you proud to be an American. This movie filled me with pride for the struggle that my forefathers had to endure to earn our freedom. Even if the story is a Hollywood concoction it still shows the great pain of war and the struggle it takes to be free.
Trots out more flag-waving wartime cliches than any movie since John Wayne's "The Alamo."
For three reasons: (1) The officers would be more experienced in defending the column that was escorting Gabriel to prison. They&#39;d be better able than those lower in rank to fight off an attack by a single man and two boys. Additionally, officer training is more intense and involved than basic training, and they would be more knowledgeable in combat tactics. (2) With the officers dead, the other Redcoats in the column would find it harder to organize themselves into a single and effective fighting unit to repel the attack, as we plainly saw happen. So, without the officers yelling orders to the lower ranking soldiers, it was easier for Martin to mount his attack successfully. (3) Targeting officers specifically was not a standard military tactic at the time. It was not part of the gentlemanly code of warfare and would cause upset and confusion when the Rebels used this tactic. Yes and no. We&#39;re probably suspending some of our disbelief for the sake of the story—the scene is an excellent opportunity to introduce us to Martin as a great guerrilla warrior. Also, he had the advantage of his two sons already being excellent marksmen, having taught them that specific skill. With their elevated position on the nearby ridge, they had a huge advantage. Additionally, Martin had extensive knowledge of the area near his farm and the terrain therein. He chose the spot specifically for its cover by the natural flora (trees, shrubs, etc) and the ridge where he planted his sons to act as his snipers. This is a technique employed by marksmen, especially with less accurate weapons such as the muskets and other muzzle loaded weapons that were used during the American Revolution. What it means is the smaller the target you aim at, the smaller the chance of missing the larger target. For example, if the boys were to aim at an officer, they could miss him. But if they aim at a button on the officer&#39;s coat, they may miss the button, but they&#39;d still hit the officer. As suspected by many people, the &quot;new&quot; Extended Cut features mostly scenes that were first used as deleted scenes for the old DVD release. Now these passages were re-integrated into the movie, adding up nearly 11 minutes to the movie. No. As with most films of the genre, it is fiction based on/inspired by true events. a5c7b9f00b

Report Page