The Patriot Full Movie Hd 720p Free Download

The Patriot Full Movie Hd 720p Free Download

Ashamed of his savagery during the French and Indian War, Benjamin Martin decided he would sit out the American Revolution, while his oldest son Gabriel enlisted minutes after South Carolina joined the fight. He changes his mind when his house is burned down and one of his children is killed by the savage Green Dragoon commander Colonel Tavington. Quickly realizing that traditional 18th century warfare tactics won't work, Martin organizes militiamen into a guerilla unit to harass Cornwallis' army long enough to allow the French to arrive.
After proving himself on the field of battle in the French and Indian War, Benjamin Martin wants nothing more to do with such things, preferring the simple life of a farmer. But when his son Gabriel enlists in the army to defend their new nation, America, against the British, Benjamin reluctantly returns to his old life to protect his son, now serving under his command, and his family from British tyranny.
what crap. i walked out in disgust after 2 hrs. i just couldn't take it anymore, although i hear it got worse. it was awful, bad script, corny, annoying.. i was amazed that the audience responded to it so well - cheering the killing scenes and buying all the gooey hollywood crap. gawdawful for sure. avoid avoid avoid...
Mel Gibson is an okay actor. I like a few movies he's in, but not much. The previews made mel Gibson or "Benjamin Martin" out to be a hero. I didn't like that. He wasn't a hero, and he didn't even want to fight. I mean he was an above average soldier, and the movie didn't show enough rage. It showed emotion when someone got killed or murdered, but it didn't show true rage. I know a lot of people disagree on me in this, but i am right. The previews set you uup for a better movie then it really was. Gladiator was better. More rage in Gladiator. Now i am not saying that The Patriot was a bad movie, because it wasn't. I think they could get someone else besides Mel Gibson for the part though. I see Nicolas cage as a "Benjamin Martin." I see even a John Travolta playing "Benjamin Martin." Why? because Nicolas Cage and John Travolta are the best actors on showing anger. Think about it. Especially Cage. And a lot Travolta. The point is i am giving this movie *** stars. It didn't deserve 4. I think this movie can be seen by anyone, even with gorry scenes. Its not like they will cry if someone gets their face blown off!
The best movie I've seen about the Revolutionary War.
For three reasons: (1) The officers would be more experienced in defending the column that was escorting Gabriel to prison. They'd be better able than those lower in rank to fight off an attack by a single man and two boys. Additionally, officer training is more intense and involved than basic training, and they would be more knowledgeable in combat tactics. (2) With the officers dead, the other Redcoats in the column would find it harder to organize themselves into a single and effective fighting unit to repel the attack, as we plainly saw happen. So, without the officers yelling orders to the lower ranking soldiers, it was easier for Martin to mount his attack successfully. (3) Targeting officers specifically was not a standard military tactic at the time. It was not part of the gentlemanly code of warfare and would cause upset and confusion when the Rebels used this tactic. Yes and no. We're probably suspending some of our disbelief for the sake of the story—the scene is an excellent opportunity to introduce us to Martin as a great guerrilla warrior. Also, he had the advantage of his two sons already being excellent marksmen, having taught them that specific skill. With their elevated position on the nearby ridge, they had a huge advantage. Additionally, Martin had extensive knowledge of the area near his farm and the terrain therein. He chose the spot specifically for its cover by the natural flora (trees, shrubs, etc) and the ridge where he planted his sons to act as his snipers. This is a technique employed by marksmen, especially with less accurate weapons such as the muskets and other muzzle loaded weapons that were used during the American Revolution. What it means is the smaller the target you aim at, the smaller the chance of missing the larger target. For example, if the boys were to aim at an officer, they could miss him. But if they aim at a button on the officer's coat, they may miss the button, but they'd still hit the officer. As suspected by many people, the "new" Extended Cut features mostly scenes that were first used as deleted scenes for the old DVD release. Now these passages were re-integrated into the movie, adding up nearly 11 minutes to the movie. No. As with most films of the genre, it is fiction based on/inspired by true events. a5c7b9f00b