Some concerns

Referring to: http://telegra.ph/Reports-1-08-01

List item 1 

https://goo.gl/k7Tm38

Should be valid because he already does it on the template(https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/lanacion.com.py/template4/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lanacion.com.py%2Fcolumnistas%2F2017%2F08%2F01%2Fgarnacha-pop%2F). It's not unreliable because it has "por" and a specific formatting and path.

The bulletted content is actually relevant information. It's present in the source and missing from IV. Grade 1 issue.

Try http://www.lanacion.com.py/columnistas/2017/07/31/la-venta-de-buzones-en-el-senado/, http://www.lanacion.com.py/columnistas/2017/07/31/tique-o-factura/ etc

List item 7

https://goo.gl/v2JQT8

Should be valid because it's regular article content that doesn't involve special work to generate IV. A template supported this -> https://goo.gl/wLLuoB

I've seen plenty of instances where admins point to templates(whether participating currently or not) that support content while the winning one doesn't, to reject it. It should be the same for everyone

List item 12

https://goo.gl/DWhuhE

Well, this is the same as a template not generating IV due to an issue such as having a must-remove facebook like/share embed. The template doesn't generate IV for most pages because of this unnecessary widget. Those pages are perfectly valid for an IV page.

Besides, Ivan Nikitin's template was doing it pretty well. 

List item 20

https://goo.gl/ChM7vt

Please be consistent. I've had my templates rejected for the exact same kind of issue in the past. That really is rudimentary to the reading experience IV pages are essentially intended to. 

> https://goo.gl/F7Tqps

Last image is missing caption. It's a p with an image and the caption text. Fairly easy. 

Please don't dismiss this by saying it's one-off because some of the issues others got are one-off as well but you still accepted them.