Shank In Hindi Download

Shank In Hindi Download

harpamal




Shank In Hindi Download

http://urllio.com/r4342






















An action film for the youth generation, set in a decaying future London. A gang set out on a chase to avenge the murder of one of their own.
Set in a dystopic future London in 2015, where society has fallen apart, gangs have taken over and the economy is in complete anarchy. The story follows Junior and his older brother, Rager, who are in charge of a local gang, "The Paper Chaserz". They try to stay out of trouble and refuse to kill as part of their 'moral code', which is especially enforced by the strong but defensive Rager. Rager leads his gang, "The Paper Chaserz" and they plan to steal goods out of a local van. The robbery is successful, but a rival gang called The Soldiers, who are notorious and bloodthirsty in trying to take-over all other postcodes in the London area, attempt a theft. The "Paper Chaserz" escape, except for Junior who is stranded and cornered by The Soldiers. Rager reappears and saves his brother by beating all the rival gang members, telling Junior to leave. As Junior flees, Rager is attacked by the crews leader Tugz, who stabs Rager in the back multiple times. Junior now teams up with the rest of his gang to get revenge on The Soldiers. The gang meets a trio of girls named Ree Ree, Tash, and Little Lexy, who agree to help them as they also have a reason to get revenge against Tugz.
I&#39;m not someone who&#39;s met many of the rich and famous . One celebrity duo I have met was Dappy and Fazer from N-Dubz &quot; Who&#39;s N-Dubz ? &quot; yeah that&#39;s the exact same question I asked wondering why all my female teenage colleagues started resembling wild cats in heat because a couple of nobodies came in to have something to eat . N-Dubz - who were that day minus that bimbo who went on to judge X-FACTOR - were a mainstream rap act who would sing about life on the mean streets of Camden Town . Obviously having such tough lives where stabbings and shootings and gang warfare is everyday existence in the ghetto they felt the need to employ a big scary black geezer as a minder because they&#39;re entering a strange untamed land called Scotland where their reputation for being violent gangsta rappers might proceed them . Before they left one of my colleagues Nicola asked to borrow my lighter which she then proceeded to give to Dappy because being a hard gangsta rapper means only wimps buy lighters innit . As they left they passed by me and stopped to give me a dirty look so I gave them a wave . Why I did they stop to stare at me ? I don&#39;t know but it&#39;s easy to give strangers a dirty look when you&#39;ve got a big scary minder with you . Two things I learned that day<br/><br/>1 ) If you&#39;re mildly &quot; famous &quot; and I use that word in its loosest , vaguest sense then teenage girls working in dead end low paid jobs think it&#39;s very exciting <br/><br/>2 ) There&#39;s something amusingly pathetic about middle class posers thinking they&#39;re hard nuts from a lawless Hell on Earth ghetto<br/><br/>Bearing this in mind I sat down to watch SHANK released in 2010 and set in 2015 where Britain has suffered economic and social collapse and where a 14 year old boy is chased by a youth on a motorbike . The scene despite blink and you&#39;ll miss it editing seemed to go on forever . Two things I was able to discern from this long opening scene was <br/><br/>1 ) Britain will be guaranteed a gold medal at the 2020 Olympics <br/><br/>2 ) London council estates have motor bike access <br/><br/>As the story continues a picture is painted that life is cheap and people have to run with the pack if they want to survive the streets - it&#39;s the law of the jungle and survival of the fittest as Junior the 14 year old boy from the opening sequence tells as about life and death in a factionalised London that is being devastated by gang warfare <br/><br/>I didn&#39;t expect it to be like the all too convincing scenario Nigel Kneale used in his 1979 QUATERMASS serial but did get reminded of the 1994 film SHOPPING starring a young Jude Law . That was a painfully underdeveloped film but within a short space of time you realise SHANK is going to be much worse due to screenwriter Paul Van Carter using made up idiosyncratic street lingo innit and director Mo Ali using sharp editing , ramping and every other directorial technique he feels like along with a constant drum and bass soundtrack . If either of them are making any social comment it becomes confused and probably ironic . By the time we&#39;re introduced to a Somalian street gang where the stereotypical characters constantly chew Khat you&#39;re worried that SNATCH might be turning in to a recruitment film for if not the BNP then certainly UKIP <br/><br/>One wonders if Mo Ali might have been aware of this because a third of the way through the whole tone of the film changes . The cast who up to this point have been the most laughably unconvincing street gang I&#39;ve ever seen with Sweet Boy played by someone who&#39;d look at home as leader of the Nu-Labour Party , start becoming subliminally conscious that they&#39;re a bunch of middle class thespians straight out of stage school and not street tough nihilists from a slum and start playing up to this . Actually they&#39;re a likable bunch of lads and when we get introduced to an equally unconvincing female street gang of slappers called The Slaughter Girls played by actresses that any dad would be proud to have as a daughter in law I found myself starting to enjoy the film for some reason . I guessing because the cast who are having so much fun are able to translate it the audience . Sure it&#39;s a dreadful film but at this point it&#39;s not supposed to be serious and the cast act accordingly . This leads me to ask why the ending features a violent act of revenge which again feels entirely different from what proceeded it ? <br/><br/>This is a genuinely bizarre film . Certainly not a good film at all and I totally understand why people might be coming out with the &quot; worst film I&#39;ve ever seen in my life &quot; cliché . It is a film that starts with serious pretensions of being a grim social commentary on broken Britain for the first third then gives up the ghost and one might actually think it satirizes pathetic middle class public school boys who are in to wigger gang culture ( Hi N-Dubz ) and is quite enjoyable at this point if you don&#39;t take it seriously but the final resolution is violent and downbeat which left me confused as to the point it was making . In its defence the characters are infinitely more likable than the ones in the not too dissimilar ATTACK THE BLOCK that came out a year later
This film isn&#39;t for everyone. From the reviews this film has received on here I&#39;d say that this film isn&#39;t really made for IMDb users specifically. The older generation that sees a good movie as a narrative with a quiet and linear plot line with some obvious sociological or spiritual statements would never understand this movie. I have been a film enthusiast for a long time. I&#39;ve analysed a lot of movies but something like this I&#39;ve never seen executed so well.<br/><br/>Anyone that&#39;s spent any time of their lives holding angst will have music to reflect and indulge in. For different forms of people from older generations different forms of rock did the trick. Nowadays we have something different that speaks to the current teen generation (specifically that of England). That would be grime and Dubstep (wiki it). It&#39;s filthy, it&#39;s grimy, it&#39;s hard hitting and, for some reason, it seems to capture the perfect blend of dance, spirit, anger and violence that younger generations have grown up with. So what the makers of this film (and of Kidulthood/Adulthood) did is spill this blend on screen and express this in the best possible way possible to them.The film is filled with aesthetics that, after a while, become you. You become all that is tense, angry and grimy.<br/><br/>Not that this movie is simply a Grime movie, there is a lot in the movie that people give it little credit for. While people were too busy pushing off this movie because of their natural dislike for anything new, many small things that resemble statements of maturity slipped by.<br/><br/>So let me start with a rundown of the film. It&#39;s 2015 (not that far away) and London is divided between the have and the have-nots because of social, political and economic reasons (much like District B13). The film&#39;s protagonist happens to be a quiet boy called Junior who, with his money-chasing brotherhood, ends up running into senseless violence and has to watch his big brother die trying to protect him. This, of course, leads to a near death-wish lust for vengeance. So he sets off to find the thug that killed him in order to make up for his belittlement. His brotherhood isn&#39;t really happy with the idea (excluding Craze) but they go along anyway.<br/><br/>Throughout the movie, his older peers-Kickz and Sweetboy, insist on telling him that it&#39;s never too late to go back and that absolute violence isn&#39;t the answer, same with a few older characters. However, these words do not reach Junior as he&#39;s stuck in a state of shock and has misinterpreted his feelings of mourning and insecurity as anger. <br/><br/>So he goes through many of the older generations of people for help, who&#39;re either drunk or trying too hard to show off a sense of importance. They have very little to say and pitch into his lust for violence. Finally, after long walks back and fourth in the area, he comes to face his brother&#39;s killer and ends up giving up the shank for a clean heart.<br/><br/>What the director was trying to express through the film was the confusion, anger and insecurity of having to grow up and live in a society brushed away from the eyes of an elite. Not only that but having to endure chaos while keeping a straight face. The movie makes several references to our need for violence by satirising video games. We see a video game sequence where Junior is running away from a helicopter on a bicycle but still get shot down. This is Junior giving narrative to his own anger and protagonising himself as the ultimate fighter but it ends in ruins when he falls down.<br/><br/>We also see another sequence where Junior is dreaming of him fighting his brother&#39;s killer in animation-mode. This is another statement about violence in cartoons. However, Junior wakes up when the cartoon dream doesn&#39;t go his way and only ends up amplifying the horribleness of what really happened to him and his brother. There are more things like this in the movie for viewers to catch.<br/><br/>This is the part where I note the drawbacks: -some parts (specifically with Whisper) were unnecessary -The editing in the club scene could&#39;ve been leaner -Some characters were unnecessary -Junior&#39;s actor (Kedar)could&#39;ve done a better job at being coherent when he talked. (I mean, srsly, how hard could it be to have a movie narration be fathomable?)<br/><br/>Other than that Ali did a good job by keeping true to the Audience with the music, plot and actors while also pushing his raw expression with sharp, grainy, washed out photography and nauseatingly shaky cinematography. This movie builds upon Kidulthood and shows us the future of black British Expression. There is nothing to gain or lose with this film. It&#39;s simply expression to be felt, heard and seen.<br/><br/>I don&#39;t expect anyone to understand this film now but in a few years this movie will be held up as a cult classic and a staple in a new emerging genre.

646f9e108c

Report Page