Robin Hood Hd Mp4 Download

Robin Hood Hd Mp4 Download

paegvassi




Robin Hood Hd Mp4 Download

http://urllio.com/qxyp9






















Returning from five years of fighting in the crusades, Robin of Locksley and his manservant Much discover their beloved home under the rule of the dastardly Sheriff of Nottingham. To fight the tyranny, Robin becomes the leader of a band of outlaws with Will Scarlett, Allan A Dale, Royston White, Little John, and Djaq. Meanwhile, feisty Lady Marian inspires the love of both her childhood sweetheart Robin and the Sheriff's second-in-command Sir Guy of Gisborne. Later episodes find the addition of friends and foes such as Prince John, warrior monk Tuck, village girl Kate, Guy's sister Isabella, and mysterious Archer.
Robin of Loxsley returns from the holy land, to find Nottingham in pieces under the rule of the new Sheriff. He leads a band of outlaws to fight the Sherrif and help the people of Nottingham, all whilst falling in love again with his ex-finance Marian.
Okay, the 1980s Robin of Sherwood series and in particular Michael Praed's performance as Robin set an unattainable standard in comparison to which any new shot at the material is bound to fall short. But they may have at least tried a bit harder. Whose decision was it to portray Robin as a smug, vain, self-assured womaniser? Why do the costumes look like something recently ordered from a "Cool Urban Gang Wear" catalogue? Those guys are just returning from a crusade, aye right, they look more like they're on their way to a night out with the blokes. Why does the camera take such care to show us that the "seasoned fighter returning from the crusades" has delicate hands like a noble lady? Why is there a medieval woman with a perm and heavy modern make-up, who lives with a "father" barely ten years her senior? Why is there a guard on the watchtower who looks like a dwarf escaped from the LOTR franchise? And why is said watchtower designed in such a way as to impale the guard should he try to move? Why does Robin patronise his old friend in the village by constantly stating the obvious ("Jane. Your good, strong wife.")? Why is Gisborne wearing biker's attire? And why is he so surprised to find out Robin's identity if two minutes later he claims that he's seen him fight before? What's with the epic!music merely to show two characters riding up to a house for a friendly visit? I watched twenty-five minutes of this garbage and then I couldn't stand it anymore. What is this even supposed to be? An action comedy? Was it supposed to be funny? All the jokes fell flat. Was Gisborne supposed to seem menacing? He seemed constipated. Was Robin supposed to come across as a decent man who feels outrage at the wrongs done to his people? He came across as fake. Having a ridiculous and pointless side-kick didn't help. And the side-kick didn't get any more likable just because he greets a bit to the sound of swords clashing in the background, so that the audience will say, "Ah, PTSD!" Will I tolerate this? No. Twenty-five tedious minutes are enough.
&quot;What else do you expect in the Saturday night Dr. Who slot!! &quot; as one positive commentator puts it (after doing the kid thing and slagging off all the people who don&#39;t agree with his view...). Rather than join in the mudslinging, I&#39;ll tell you what I&#39;d expect: first up, a better script - of the type created FOR Dr Who by Russell T Davies; something witty, sharp, well observed and relevant; not one that is wooden, laboured and so embarrassingly PC it comes across like an advert for the &#39;Nanny State&#39;. Second, a bit of direction for a cast that has promise: Richard Armitage is wasted (he looks more like a panto villain from amdram land most of the time - and he is a LOT better than that!) and Keith Allen - an actor with great presence (watch him as a devil worshipper in a Morse re-run to see evil incarnate), needs more to do than a walk-on imitation of Alan Rickman&#39;s sheriff! Third: a better costume designer - some of Marion&#39;s kit looks like it&#39;s straight out of Grease, not the 12th century! The story lines don&#39;t even have to be that realistic to make the show watchable (and in spite of myself, I have watched most of it; perhaps hoping for better things?) - remember Robin of Sherwood, which got heavily into the mystical side of the legend (Herne the Hunter, etc). At times very silly, but they got away with it because they had a great cast well directed and the whole thing had an air of authenticity about it without being bogged down by a script that tried, by turns, to be trendy and hip one moment and woodenly medieval the next. And for those who can&#39;t remember the early 80s, that show went out in an earlier time slot (albeit on ITV).<br/><br/>In the end, I&#39;m not sure the writers know what they want from the hero&#39;s latest incarnation: is this a preachy, morality play for the 21st century? A period swashbuckler? Or simply an attempt to cash in on the renewed success of Dr Who by filling the post dinnertime slot with this cheesy salute to pop culture? I leave it to you to decide...

The main characters who die during the course of the three seasons are Roy, Marian&#39;s father, Marian, Meg, Alan a Dale, Guy of Gisborne, Isabella, Vasey (the Sheriff) and Robin of Loxley (Robin Hood). a5c7b9f00b

Report Page