Malayalam Movie Download Tristan Isolde
latvanMalayalam Movie Download Tristan + Isolde
http://urllio.com/r20zwIn the Dark Ages, after the fall of the Roman Empire, weak Britain is divided into several clans, while the powerful Ireland, untouched by the Romans, dominates and ravages the British tribes. The just and noble British leader, Marke, meets with the other clan chiefs to try to unite the country, but they are attacked and slaughtered by the Irish army headed by Morholt. Marke loses one hand protecting the young Tristan, who had just lost his parents, and Marke raises the boy as if he were of his blood. Years later, after another attack by the Irish forces, Tristan rescues his people, who had been captured to serve as slaves, and kills the brutal Morholt, to whom the beautiful Irish princess, Isolde, had been promised in marriage. Tristan is poisoned by the sword of Morholt, declared dead by his mates, and put on a boat as part of his funeral. The ship floats out to sea, and lands on the Irish shore. Isolde, along with her maid-servant, Bradnae, finds the boat with Tristan in it, and hides him in a hut, where she nurses him back to health. In the process, they fall in love for each other, but with Isolde concealing her identity from Tristan. When Tristan is about to be discovered by Irish guards, he escapes by boat back to Britain to avoid being captured and killed. Isolde's father, King Donnchadh, together with the British traitor Wictred, declares a joust as part of a plan to divide the British and make Wictred king, by promising the hand of Isolde to the winner. However, Tristan wins the tournament. Without knowing that Isolde is his love, Tristan offers her to Marke, in order to make Marke king and thus unify the British clans. When Tristan sees who Isolde is, he must decide between his friendship and loyalty to Marke and his love for Isolde.
An affair between the second in line to Britain's throne and the princess of the feuding Irish spells doom for the young lovers.
In recent times I have been subjected to both this movie and "King Arthur", on DVDs chosen by others for an evening's "entertainment" and together they achieve nothing more than bearing out a growing notion I have that the modern movie-watching public totally lacks discrimination, and is content as long as they get "action". Both movies were utter rubbish.<br/><br/>Whatever happened to character development? Whatever happened to meaningful dialogue? Whatever happened to ACTING? And, when watching something that vaguely purports to be "historical", whatever happened to attempting to capture some measure of accuracy, some realistic idea of the "political map" of the time, even some slight flavour of the era, especially in its social attitudes. Why do they all have to display the value set of 21st century America? I have read on the message boards of disclaimers that "little was known" of the dark ages. Not so. Considerable amounts are known, with much learned scholarship on the era, but these jokers simply couldn't be bothered to do any homework.<br/><br/>I only wish I could vote 0/10
As Stephen King said, "It's not the story but he who tells it." Ridley Scott has presented us with yet another of his visions. You won't come away from this film having learned another story but having intimately known the characters. None of the dialogue is over-the-top; it flows quite naturally. The subtle score and filming are what we have come to expect from Scott. The actors are very real and the emotions sincere. In all fairness, no movie of this type can compare to the 1968 Franco Zeffirelli adaptation of Romeo And Julliette. Rufus Sewell was the most remarkable. His eyes are captivating. It was a nice touch that Scott added the Roman ruins. Especially since in the last 10 years, there have been significant archaeological finds in England during excavation for building. The mosaics in the garden were strong visual queues.
A feeble medieval epic with a lackluster romance at its center.
a5c7b9f00b