I Robot Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Mp4

I Robot Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Mp4

delgiov




I, Robot Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Mp4

http://urllio.com/qzbog






















It's 2035 A.D., where robots are everyday objects and are programmed to live alongside humans. Detective Del Spooner is called out to investigate the apparent suicide of the scientist behind these robots, Dr. Alfred Lanning. Spooner suspects that the death might not be a suicide, but the result of one of the robots. All robots are programmed by three laws, but Spooner starts to wonder if a robot can in fact feel emotions, and possibly murder. But if Spooner's suspicions are true, he is going to have a hard time convincing everyone.
This is the year 2035. Everybody in the world relies on a huge system of robots, which are programmed specifically to help humans and not harm them in any way. But one person does not think that robots are helpful. Chicago homicide detective Del Spooner. But one day, he received a call from the United States Robotics (USR) about a recent death of renowned robot scientist Dr. Alfred J. Laning. Spooner immediately blamed this incident on robots without justifiable reason or proof. Then, he begins his investigation on Lanning's death, only to discover Sonny, a "unique" robot. What Spooner does not realize, is that something is about to happen. Something that is beyond even Spooner's wildest dreams.
1) The main character performed by Mr Will Smith is pathetic. He is like a run-of-the-mill hero of the day: cocky, chatty, self-confident, and invulnerable. He is black too, but it&#39;s not a problem (of course). Suppose, the problem is that the actor has the qualities of a comedian. I would prefer a serious brooder. Comedy elements often destroy sci-fi. Here it&#39;s a perfect example.<br/><br/>2) The dialogues are too numerous and too shallow. The humans chat a lot and the robots chat a lot. And when you hear much of that during a sci-fi, you get annoyed and distracted from the main ideas. There are also some stupid phrases (they were pushed into the movie for a more &quot;teenager feel&quot; maybe?), like the one pronounce by a boy from the rebelling crowd, when he sees how cool the woman is.<br/><br/>3) The action scenes are laughable. Not because they are done poorly, but because they make the whole film look like a fantasy. Hundreds of tough robots collide with the crowd of men and it looks that the men are fighting off all right. And the main character is jumping about in slow-mo, waving his gun about and taking out targets while he&#39;s in the air. It should look cool if you are watching a mindless action, but here, with some serious topics as the background, it turns into a charade.<br/><br/>4) The design of robots is not to my taste. I don&#39;t like it. They look goofy like cartoon characters from a &quot;Pixar&quot;/&quot;Disney&quot; production.<br/><br/>All these things have such an awkward impression, that I don&#39;t even want to think about the plot, however brilliant it should be.<br/><br/>The final lines: it is a shiny Hollywood production for having fun on a Sunday afternoon, if your fun supposes watching movies like &quot;Independence Day&quot; or &quot;Demolition Man&quot;. You watch, you go &#39;Wow!&#39; and you forget all this crap in a couple of hours never to watch it again. I really expected this movie to be from a different category (even with such an actor as Mr Will Smith). It reminds me of &quot;Bee Movie&quot;. And that&#39;s not just a bad sign - that&#39;s a horrible sign. Whenever I experience such ambitious productions in the genre of sci-fi, my mood gets spoilt for quite a time. Sorry, but this flick has no chances against, for instance, &quot;Cyborg&quot; (a sci-fi with a very low rating on IMDb and without any CGI at all). And if I mention &quot;Blade Runner&quot; or &quot;Alien&quot;… A 3 out of 10. Thank you for attention.
As an Asimov fan, it has always been disappointing to see none of his books being converted into movies. The few movies that do exist are not good adaptations.<br/><br/>&#39;I, Robot&#39; is a notable exception. The story sticks to Asimov&#39;s philosophy of portraying Robots-as-Pathos. Set in a futuristic society where a single organization has a monopoly on almost all robots, the protagonist, Del Spooner (played by Will Smith)is is one of the few remaining anti-robot police officers. He is assigned to the murder investigation of a top roboticist at US Robots. His primary suspect is a robot from a new line of robots that the organization is about to launch.<br/><br/>Susan Calvin (robopsychologist at US Robots) believes otherwise. She is convinced that since a robot must follow the three laws of robotics the suspected robot cannot be the perpetrator. The action and drama in the chase scenes where Spooner and Calvin face an army of (non-violent) robots is a thrilling watch. The robots have a futuristic design and the cinematography is good as well.<br/><br/>A must watch for Asimov fans and science fiction fans too. The movie has both- the action and advanced technology of a mainstream sci-fi flick as well as the exploration of the human-robot interactions and the psychology of both (which are always a highlight of Asimov&#39;s robot works).<br/><br/>For a casual movie watcher, it can serve as a good introduction to this genre.
A humans vs. robots saga that feels machine-made, I, Robot looks to have been assembled from the spare parts of dozens of previous sci-fi pictures.
In the year 2035 A.D., robots have become valued assistants to human society. When leading robotics scientist, Dr Alfred Lanning (<a href="/name/nm0000342/">James Cromwell</a>), is found dead at the U.S. Robotics plant, apparently due to suicide, Chicago Police Detective Del Spooner (<a href="/name/nm0000226/">Will Smith</a>) suspects that one of the robots named Sonny (voice and body movements of <a href="/name/nm0876138/">Alan Tudyk</a>) is the murdered Lanning. That would be impossible, maintains robot psychologist Dr. Susan Calvin (<a href="/name/nm0005256/">Bridget Moynahan</a>), because all robots are programmed to obey the Three Laws of Robotics. During his investigation, Spooner discovers that the problem is actually much bigger than just one rogue robot. Sort of. This movie is based on the robot stories of <a href="/name/nm0001920/">Isaac Asimov</a> [1920-1992]. It borrows several characters (notably Dr Alfred Lanning and Dr Susan Calvin, plot points and concepts, the most important of them being the Three Laws of Robotics), but it doesn&#39;t directly follow any of Asimov&#39;s novels or short stories, and the main character, Chicago Police Detective Del Spooner, was created specifically for this movie and isn&#39;t an Asimov character. <a href="/title/tt1083849/">I, Robot 2</a> is in production, but no release date has been set. The Three Laws of Robotics as written by Asimov and shown in the beginning scenes of the movie are: (1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; (2) A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; and (3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. In later stories, Asimov proposed a &quot;Zeroth&quot; law which was as follows: A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. A condition stating that the Zeroth Law must not be broken was added to the original three laws. First of all, the robots technically do not violate the Laws, V.I.K.I. does. The robots simply do what V.I.K.I. commands them to do when they are in an direct uplink with USR and their light turns red. The only robot who can ignore the Three Laws by himself is Sonny, and he was specifically designed this way by Alfred Lanning. The robots have limited artificial intelligence, but V.I.K.I. is a much more complex program. She keeps the robots updated with the newest information to better serve humanity, but she is also programmed with the Three Laws to prevent her from doing harm. This learning ability starts to clash with her basic programming; where the Three Laws normally pertain to individuals or groups of people, V.I.K.I. starts to apply them in a broader sense, to the whole of humanity. Mankind keeps endangering itself through wars and pollution, and the First Law tells her that she cannot allow a human (or humanity) to be hurt through inaction. So her rationality decides that it comes down to numbers and she has to intervene: just like the robot that once saved Spooner&#39;s life had to make a rational choice, and calculated that he had the best chances of survival, V.I.K.I. calculates that much more people can be saved from self-harm if she selectively ignores parts of the Laws; by ignoring commands and allowing some individual people to be hurt, she can protect humanity far better than when she would strictly adhere to the Laws and let humanity destroy itself. She has effectively reinterpreted the Laws and their purpose, and acts according to what she thinks is the best implementation of them. Virtual Interactive Kinetic Intelligence There is no real answer. Perhaps he tries not to use his biomechanical arm in an attempt to show his dislike of the concept of robots. Viewers have suggested several possibilities: (1) there was an automatic feeder, (2) there was a doggy/cat door that allowed the cat to come and go to find his own food and do his duty, and (3) being the future, there was a robot who made sure that the cat was fed and his litter box cleaned. His Grandmother adopted it. Spooner and Calvin infilitrate the USR building. After a fight with robots, Spooner travels down 30 stories to VIKI (<a href="/name/nm0389524/">Fiona Hogan</a>)&#39;s brain and injects her with nanites (microscopic robots); decommissioning her. When the direct link to VIKI is broken, all the Robots stop rebelling. The NS-5s are recalled, and Sonny travels to the Lake Michigan Landfill to liberate the robots stored there, thereby becoming the man he saw in his own dream. He was in a car accident with a little girl named Sarah, and the NS-4 that was passing nearby saved him instead of her. The robot calculated that he had a 45% chance of survival while she had 11% chance of surviving, so he blames the robot that saved him for the girl&#39;s death. Because of this, he believes robots don&#39;t feel emotions and is doubtful that Sonny says he feels emotions and dreams when he sleeps. a5c7b9f00b

Report Page