Escape From LA Tamil Pdf Download

Escape From L.A. Tamil Pdf Download

Snake Plissken is once again called in by the United States government to recover a potential doomsday device from Los Angeles, now an autonomous island where undesirables are deported.
Sequel to "Escape From New York". In 2000, a huge earthquake hits Los Angeles which causes the whole city to be now situated on an island. In that year the new life-term US President, an out-spoken moralist declares that all people not conforming to the high morals he sets for the country will be deported to the Los Angeles island. Like New York, a wall is built, guards posted to stop any escapes and if sent there - you can't return to the US. In 2013, Cuervo Jones, a terrorist invades the dreams of the President's daughter, Utopia, and brainwashes her into stealing a device from a weapons establishment and runs with Cuervo to the island. Snake Plissken, hero of Escape From New York, is forced again to go to the island to get the device by the President (who doesn't care if Utopia returns or not.) and he is poisoned to ensure his co-operation. Like New York, Los Angeles is now a decaying city, a hot-bed of scum and weirdos and Snake has 9 hours to find the device and Utopia, and get out before the poison kicks in.
Escape From L. A. is a very bad sequel to the cult classic Escape From New York (1981). It has way too much humor in it for a story that was dark. I mean i like Steve Buscemi, he's kinda funny, but what was the point with him being in the movie? I also didn't like how they turned Kurt Russell's character of Snake Plissken into a character that says one liners, i mean we already have enough of those! They tried to turn Snake Plissken into a character that he shouldn't be. And the whole Cleavland references are just plain stupid. I hate this movie a lot because too much humor can kill a movie and that's what it did here. I mean the original was very good, but this one sucks! No wonder this god-awful piece of crap didn't do well at the box office! I mean John Carpenter? Come on, you can make better movies than this! (Halloween,Escape From New York,The Fog,etc)
While Escape from NY was not a fine example of cinematic artistry, I can certainly appreciate its place in cult film history. Having said that however, that should not automatically give license for a sequel to be made. <br/><br/>A friend of mine had mentioned that he had seen this film and that it was so outrageously bad that I had to see it. Not one to turn down outrageously bad films (unless they feature the likes of Meg Ryan or J. Lo) I was still leery of watching it. The result? An unholy need to cleanse my retinas via blowtorch. What made this a bad film? Oh, let me count the ways: Let&#39;s see, there was Kurt Russell, having brushed the mothballs off of his Snake Plissken costume, who gave a great performance in the vein of his roles as Captain Ron and ‘Gabe&#39; Cash. I absolutely could not get enough of his mumbled lines, his catch phrase of `You got a smoke&#39; and his general joie de vivre. There was Pam Grier, playing an Amazonian woman who inexplicably has a voice lower than the joker who sings for Crash Test Dummies. Rounding out our featured relics from the 70&#39;s was Peter Fonda who played the wafer thin surf dude. And speaking of surfing, let&#39;s not forget the not-so-special effects that included the shockingly bad surfing scene in which we see Fonda and Russell badly outlined against a blue screen, surfing a wave along an L.A. highway. <br/><br/>This film was released in 1996, the same year as Fargo, Big Night and Trainspotting. It is both absurd and abjectly sorrowful that someone would have actually walked up to a multiplex box office, possibly looked at these posters on the wall and still said, `Here&#39;s my 6.50 for Escape from L.A.&#39; I am beyond even imagining that this film was meant to be campy. This film is so beyond reproach that it&#39;s very existence is an insult to anyone who has ever attempted to make a film, anyone who is a student or lover of film or anyone who has even seen a film. *Any* film. <br/><br/>I&#39;ve seen the work of Jon Waters. I&#39;ve seen the films of Ed Wood. Pink Flamingos and Bride of the Monster are like Citizen Kane and Taxi Driver compared to this tripe. I wouldn&#39;t even suggest this movie be watched on a bet. In fact, I am so disgusted with myself for spending this much time and effort on this review that I have an uncontrollable desire to either shower so I can towel off the memories or gouge my eyes out in a fit of ancient Grecian angst. My suggestion to the developers of the sequel to The Ring? Feature this movie as the next `death tape.&#39; At least that way we as an audience will understand why these saps are dying. <br/><br/>--Shelly
Loud, rollicking, alternately ultra-violent and hilarious, Escape from L.A. is Snake redux, and what more do you need, really?
Director John Carpenter commented just before the release of Escape From L.A. (1996) that IF this movie was successful then he would consider a third movie and that the only place left for Snake to escape from would be Earth. &quot;Escape From Earth&quot; was just an idea - Carpenter never even gave that title, it&#39;s just something people assumed it would be called.<br/><br/>Escape From L.A. evidentley was not a commercial success and so the idea of a third movie went no further than Carpenter&#39;s comment. Depends on your point of view. Snake&#39;s decision is to essentially turn Earth&#39;s history back to the Victorian era, pre-electricity, where a man like him would flourish as a self-reliant gunfighter and despeardo. On the other hand it&#39;s suggested that humankind has deteriorated into tyranny so he essentially tears a corrupt society down and replaces it with a more egalitarian society &#39;Cabin in the Woods&#39; style instead. a5c7b9f00b