Battlefield Earth Dubbed Hindi Movie Free Download Torrent

latriulr

In the year 3000, humanity is no match for the Psychlos, a greedy, manipulative race on a quest for ultimate profit. Led by the seductive and powerful Terl, the Psychlos are stripping Earth of its resources, using the broken remnants of humanity as slaves. What is left of the human race has reverted to a primitive state, believing the invaders to be demons and technology to be evil. After humanity has all but given up any hope of freeing themselves from alien oppression, a young man named Tyler decides to leave his desolate home high in the Rocky Mountains to discover the truth, whereupon he is captured and enslaved. It is then that he decides to fight back, leading his fellow man in one final struggle for freedom.
It's the year 3000 A.D.; the Earth is lost to the alien race of Psychlos. Humanity is enslaved by these gold-thirsty tyrants, whom are unaware that their 'man-animals' are about to ignite the rebellion of a lifetime.
This movie is very faithful to the first 100 pages of L. Ron Hubbard's novel. Unfortunately, the book is over 1000 pages long and the last 900 pages are crammed randomly into the last 5 minutes of the movie. The first 45 minutes or so seems to be a very close rendition of the opening of the novel. It sets up the situation quite well. It seems that the original idea was to make this into a mini-series on TV depicting the entire saga. It also seems that once the backers realized what they had, they pulled the plug on funding and the rest was completed as best as they could manage on what was left of the budget. Surprisingly enough, John Travolta plays Terl pretty much as he is described in the novel, but only for the first half of the movie. Who knows what he was playing later on, but it wasn't Terl. Terl didn't talk to people in the novel, he talked at them. Making Battlefield Earth into a two-hour movie was roughly the same as it would be cutting up the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy into just two hours. The result was a mess. In the book, the time-line is stretched over a period of three or four years with every action meticulously described. In the movie, I think it lasted about a week and ignored the bulk of the action. This movie isn't even good enough to be bad.
Ok, this WAS a truly awful film, but blame for it's sheer awfulness has been sorely misplaced, proving once again that people don't read very much. *Stepping down from the literacy soapbox now...* As an avid reader of science fiction and fantasy I began reading Battlefield Earth upon hearing of plans to make the film adaptation. I had previously been wary of the book, noting that it had several sequels that were published after the author's death (rarely a good sign). I was hoping that I had just mistakenly overlooked a classic gem of science fiction writing authored by a misunderstood genius and founder of a cooky, wingnut religion. The main fault I found with the movie was its somewhat successful attempt to be faithful to its source material. Filming nearly the entire movie at a 30 degree angle was totally unnecessary, and as with all book-to-movie adaptations, something was lost in the translation - namely the process by which the 'man-animals' became humans and took back their world. What seemed to happen in mere days in the film was described by the author as happening over a period of months in the book. The man-animals did not learn to fly Harrier jets, learn trigonometry, and work alien technology 'overnight' as depicted in the movie. Terl was perfectly portrayed by Travolta - he was EXACTLY and in every way what I imagined after reading the book. He was never an omnipotent, monolithically evil alien menace reminiscent of ID4 or Star Trek's 'Borg'. He was a crooked, short-sighted, and intellectually challenged bureaucrat. His assistant, Ker, was well-played by Forest Whittaker. Barry Pepper could have been a much better Johnny Goodboy Tyler had the time constraints usually imposed on book-to-film adaptations allowed more of his relationship with Terl to be more evident on screen. I believe that this poor movie has not exactly been given a fair shake because of various Scientology conspiracy theories (Travolta's belief in Scientology and his clout in Hollywood pushing this accursed project through production), and numerous weaknesses in the plot (Psyclos coveting gold as mush as humans, working 1,000-year-old Harrier jets, properties of Uranium mixed with an alien atmosphere) that should be attributed to the author of the book rather than the filmmakers. In short, the filmmakers probably did as well as they could have, considering the second-rate source material they were given. Sadly, I do see myself paying money to see the proposed sequel just out of morbid curiosity, and because there is no way I can see myself finishing the second half of this truly awful book.
Shot after shot photographed at wobbly, off-center angles for no particular reason, weigh every action sequence down with super-slo-mo in lame imitation of "The Matrix" or end every single scene with a vertical wipe.
Yes, Battlefield Earth is loosely based on the novel of the same title by author and founder of Scientology L. Ron Hubbard. Originally intended to be a two-part move, Battlefield Earth depicts the first half of the novel. A sequel was intended to be made shortly after, but these plans never occurred. No. While the author of the novel Battlefield Earth, L. Ron Hubbard, is also the founder of the Church of Scientology, little or no Scientologist views are presented in the book. John Travolta was intent on making this film as both a follower of L.Ron Hubbard and as a fan of the source material. However, the film focuses on the science fiction aspects of the original novel, and does not intentionally promote any religious agenda. Slight similarities between themes of the novel and film and teachings of Scientology do exist, but the connection is more incidental than anything else. Several things. The book was long and verbose, and was difficult to condense into a two-hour movie; in fact, only the first half was filmed, with the second intended to be the sequel. The pulp science-fiction plot was considered to be clunky and outdated, and despite John Travolta's enthusiasm for the film, many studios were unwilling to finance the movie. Upon release, the film received a critical drubbing, with common criticisms such as the poor acting, an outrageous and inconsistent plot, and a baffling visual style employed by the director (which included an excessive use of slow-motion and Dutch angles). This led to poor word of mouth before and after the release. In addition, the often poorly portrayed image of Scientology instantly tainted public perception, and the motives behind making this movie based on a novel by Scientology's founder <a href="/name/nm0399196/">L. Ron Hubbard</a> seemed to overwhelm viewer objectivity. Lastly, production company Franchise Pictures was sued in 2004 by its German investors when it was discovered that it had been inflating film budgets, including that of Battlefield Earth. Franchise Pictures was forced to pay $121 million in damages and ultimately went bankrupt as a result. The British Version misses a headbutt. Approx 2 seconds are cut. Originally, there were plans to make a sequel to Battlefield Earth, since the movie covers roughly half of the novel of the same title. Shortly after Battlefield Earth was released in 2000, Travolta indicated he would move forward with a sequel. However, a year later he stated that a sequel was not in the works. Because of the poor reception that Battlefield Earth received, coupled with the collapse of Franchise Pictures, plans for a sequel failed to gain any serious traction and were abandoned. a5c7b9f00b

Battlefield Earth Dubbed Hindi Movie Free Download Torrent

Report Page