...
DR program hailed down on Twitter - hashtag goes viral: 'Knowledge is not a point of view' | BT Film, TV and Streaming - www.bt.dk #videnerfandemeikkeetsynspunkt is currently circulating on Twitter. After the debate on the DR program 'Ellen Imellem', the criticism of the concept, where a researcher is secretly questioned by a conspiracy theorist, has gone viral. Thus, professors of astrophysics Anja Cetti Andersen's statements in 'Presselogen' have become what all people prefer to discuss on social media. "Knowledge is not a point of view," said the physicist, who together with several other researchers and their union DM have complained to DR after their participation in the program. The argument for the criticism is that the participants in the program did not know that they should have questions from conspiracy theorists and activists, and that according to the participants and several viewers, this is not a 'fun' program, but an exhibiting grip where the researchers did not know. what they were involved in. The criticism has been rejected by the editor-in-chief of the program Jonas Delfs on several occasions. Most recently, he appeared in 'Deadline', where he once again insisted that DR has made a product and a contract that is 'within the disc'. “We do it that we take up different topics. We treat them in a way that is entertaining. We have not speculated that people should be made fun of. This is an example of satire, "he said. B.T. has tried to get an interview with Jonas Delfs, but he has not returned our inquiries. But the researchers' complaint is supported to that extent on Twitter. 'I hope the already committed researchers are still contributing to public debate - but what about all the others who do not get started because they have now been confirmed in (their prejudice) that one cannot trust journalists ?,' writes Maja Horst, professor of responsible technology at DTU. 'It is the ultimate goal of arrogance to keep claiming that one has' hit within the disc' when so many (researcher) fingers point back at oneself. The DR group clearly operates with different discs than the rest of us, 'says Charlotte Price Hoffmann, who is responsible for PR and communication at Videnskabsklub. 'Dear @DRconcern. #videnerfandemeikkeetsynspunkt and if I may come up with a well-meaning piece of advice from #LivetSomArkæolog, then it's time to put that shovel away from you. The hole you have dug is far too deep, and you will not find anything down there, 'writes Lars Søgaard Sørensen, who works as an archaeologist. Morten DD Hansen, who has previously written on Twitter that he will boycott DR after the program, has also been out and cemented his decision in a tweet. Just posted this reply. And this is how it must necessarily sound when approached. I would then urge, to follow suit. P1 Debate, Orientation, Deadline etc. can appropriately interview some journalists or conspiracy theorists instead. - Morten DD (@MortenDDHansen) The researchers demand in their complaints that the programs be deleted and the raw material destroyed, as they have the right to demand it according to DR's own ethical guidelines. "All programs must be taken down, as they were recorded on the wrong premises, and there is a clear desire that all raw material is also deleted, cf. DR's own ethical guidelines," The announcement from DR has so far been that it has not intended to remove the programs that are also still on DRTV. Editor-in-chief Jonas Delfs is, however, supported by Henrik Bo Nielsen, director of Children and Young People at DR. To 'Deadline' he has sent a written reply. 'We are aware that we have come out with a program that goes to the limit and creates debate, but it is still our view that it has happened within the disc.' ABROAD Media: UKRAINE ABROAD Sport ABROAD SPORT ABROAD SPORT sport BERLINGSKE WEEKENDAVISEN sport indictment ukraine indictment Berlingske Media A / S Pilestræde 34 DK-1147 Copenhagen KTlf. +45 33 75 75 33 CVR.no .: 29 20 73 13